Talk:Pujiang line

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

• Pujiang line → Pujiang LinePujiang Line
• Nanhui line → Nanhui Line
• Jiamin line → Jiamin LineJiamin Line

– Capitalising L in "line" per WP:PROPERNOUN. Multiple sources have used the capitalised version of "line". For the Nanhui and Jiamin Lines the move will also be WP:CONSISTENT to the recently moved Airport Link Line (Shanghai), as these 3 lines are all part of the Shanghai Suburban Railway network. Sources are as follows:

• Pujiang Line: ^{[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]}
• Nanhui Line and Jiamin Line: ^{[9][10][11][12][13]}

S5A-0043🚎^(Talk) 08:44, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains. S5A-0043🚎^(Talk) 08:48, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Support, thanks for laying out the evidence so clearly. Toadspike [Talk] 09:45, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Support per nom. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Support per nom. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 21:36, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Support all per nom. I appreciate the clear, concise, and complete presentation of the arguments and evidence. I did a Google News search to check additional sources and easily confirmed that this capitalization is consistent. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC)