This article seems to be mixing up things also there is false information presenting a scaled suborbital test article as TSTO which it is not. Lot of wp:CRYSTALBALL gazing as well using speculative timelines as projected deadlines. Same could be said about cost reduction claims. The configuration of TSTO itself is very much in early stages and there are multiple ideas being considered.[1][2]
ISRO has used the term RLV-TD interchangeably for the winged body as well the project itself.[3][4]. As I see it this wiki article needs to focus on vehicle used for this mission and leave the rest to RLV_Technology_Demonstration_Programme. In Annual Report 2014-15[5] RLV-TD(demonstrator) is also described as TDV or 'Technology Demonstrator Vehicle'. Ohsin (talk) 08:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Agree Speculations need to be identified as such and not as projections. The expected "achievements" should be moved to the Programme article and presented as goals. The Programme article as currently written seems to suffer from similar fuzzy focus; it is summarized "as a first step towards realising a [reusable TSTO]." JustinTime55 (talk) 12:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
