Talk:Self-determination
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Self-determination article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: Parts of this page are restricted Parts of this article are related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. If it is unclear which parts of the page are covered, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
|
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Renaming article to: Self-determination of peoples
Maybe not in de US, but in Europe, self-detemination as a notion is tied to the basic classical human rights principle for individuals. The concept of 'self-ownership' isn't known as a notion for the right for a person in Europe. When European countries speak about the content of this article they give the article a name like: Selbestimmungsrecht der Völker (de), Droit des peuples à disposer d'eux-mêmes (fr), Autodeterminazione dei popoli (it), Samostanowienie narodów (pl Self-determination of nations) or Den nationale selvbestemmelsesret (da National self-determinatiion right) or Nationellt självbestämmande (sw National self-determinatiion) etc.
In the UN treaties the frase is: "self-determination of peoples" (UN Charter) and "All peoples have the right of self-determination" (International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights / Civil and Political Rights. To give room (in other language versions) for an article on the right of self-determination (for individuals), linked to the english language version on self-determination, and Google finding the right article, it would be good the english version makers respect other countries, other cultures and other language versions and think about changing the name of an article with the content this article has, into "Self-determination_of_peoples". Thanks and keep up the good work VanArtevelde (talk) 19:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'd suggest that this isn't done. I'm aware that there are several countries that dispute what constitutes a "people", whose arguments basically deny that a population constitutes a people with the right to self-determination. Guatemala does it ref Belize, Argentine ref the Falklands, Spain ref Gibraltar. Renaming is likely to trigger ethnic disputes and is unnecessary in my opinion. WCMemail 09:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Self-determination in this sense, rather than the personal psychological/philosophical sense, appears to be the common meaning. Searching self-determination gives you first and foremost the international law principle. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- First, the article should indeed be titled The Self-Determination of Peoples, as worded in the UN charter.
- After reading these articles Consent of the Governed, Self-Determination, Secession, and Decolonization, this article Self-Determination is the most ambiguous and awkward.
- It is a relatively new term and ill-defined. The article starts as a sort of instantiation of the political philosophy of Consent of the Governed and then deteriorates into secessionist movements, becoming redundant of the Secession article. Self-Determination was the lubricating language towards ending European colonization. The term emerge to facility dialogue in the decline of European imperialism, hence it was co-opted into the UN Charter. The UN does not openly endorse all secessionism or independence movements. In fact, the UN charter explicitly respects the territorial integrity and sovereignty of existing states. The article should trace the origin of the term, discuss inclusion into Wilson's 14 points, and conclude with the UN Charter before linking to the Decolonization article.
- In the talk page archives the comment by FOAR was spot on, "This page appears to have become a list of independence movements and territorial disputes rather than dealing with the issue of self-determination as it applies to individual cases." This commentor got to the root of the problem, "the section on disputes is beginning to sprawl out with everyone adding their pet independence/sovereignty campaign regardless of sourcing or whatever. I'm beginning to think the problem here is the whole idea of listing movements on this page at all." Dap567 (talk) 16:55, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 7 March 2026
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: The first paragraph it's an interpretation of the reference. My purposed change is much closer to a reliable source and to the Wikipedia in Spanish article.
Diff:
| − | '''Self-determination''' refers to a [[people]]'s right to | + | '''Self-determination''' refers to a [[people]]'s right to choose their own political system and to pursue their own economic, social, and cultural development. |
Sanbor (talk) 15:39, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- I used the following source: https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e873#law-9780199231690-e873-p-29
- Here is the Self-determination article in Spanish: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derecho_de_autodeterminaci%C3%B3n Sanbor (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this request related to the lede falls under the EC protection for WP:PIA enforcement. In any case I would suggest that you find WP:Consensus for this change before an editor implements it and also note that another wiki page isn't considered a reliable source per WP:Circular. In my opinion the current opening of the lede is well sourced and well formulated, but opinion may differ on that.Closing the edit request to clear the backlog. ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2026 (UTC)



