Talk:Star Trek
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Star Trek article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| Star Trek is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Star Trek has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 22, 2004. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changing the figure at infobox
While in dark mode at the WP interface, the figure is barely visible. I suggest for the figure to be replace with one that appears distinctive enough between different WP modes, light and dark ones. A.Cython (talk) 03:17, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Done, that was a fan made logo, changed back to previous image. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Reboot (Kelvin Timeline)
it seems like Paramount is going to reboot the film series again. https://variety.com/2025/film/news/new-star-trek-movie-dungeons-and-dragons-jonathan-goldstein-john-francis-daley-1236582221 while I completely agree that we should wait until something is actually going to be announced, calling the time period between enterprise and the streaming era the reboot timeline seems less and less useful and more and more of a misnomer. which reboot? Oldag07 (talk) 14:04, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- That article doesn’t say anything about it being a reboot; it just says it won’t be connected to previous Star Trek stories. AJD (talk) 14:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- "Reboot (Kelvin timeline) film series (2009–2016)" for the title of a section, and "Reboot (Kelvin Timeline)" for the film section. Probably not appropriate to change now, but if a second reboot does happen, the 2009-2016 section should be "Kelvin Timeline". ~2025-34687-02 (talk) 16:25, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Why do you think the movie is a reboot, and not a story about, let's say, 26th or 27th century in original or Kelvin universes? IKhitron (talk) 08:37, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. There is very little info about this right now. We should learn more the new films before making any changes to several articles. SonOfThornhill (talk) 14:18, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- Why do you think the movie is a reboot, and not a story about, let's say, 26th or 27th century in original or Kelvin universes? IKhitron (talk) 08:37, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- "Reboot (Kelvin timeline) film series (2009–2016)" for the title of a section, and "Reboot (Kelvin Timeline)" for the film section. Probably not appropriate to change now, but if a second reboot does happen, the 2009-2016 section should be "Kelvin Timeline". ~2025-34687-02 (talk) 16:25, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Audio drama series
The Audio drama series section needs updating. ~2025-41288-44 (talk) 20:39, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Article review
It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:36, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- It depends on where are these paragraphs located. If they are in the lead, we don't need citations. If they are in the article's body, they should probably be deleted as OR. Dimadick (talk) 22:37, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
