Talk:U.S. sterilization policies in Puerto Rico

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education assignment: HIST 385 Latinos in the US

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2025 and 16 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MadisonCurtis (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by SusieCCameron (talk) 18:53, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Postpartum sterilization and coercion

The only cited source in the 3rd paragraph under Sterilization policies and implementation, Socialist and Cigarmaker: Artisans' Proletarianization in the Making of the Puerto Rican, makes no mention postpartum sterilization or coerced sterilization. In fact, the article doesn't mention sterilization at all.

I'm removing this unsourced content unless sources backing the claims of postpartum sterilization and coerced sterilization, absent any sources to back these statements. 73.221.181.200 (talk) 06:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

PROD question

@Will (Wiki Ed): Hi! I might be willing to recreate/rewrite this page from scratch at some point in the near future (would probably take a few weeks). Not sure if this would factor in to your PROD. I could just create a new page, or, if it makes sense, I could expand a stub version of this page with the hallucinated(?) content removed. Spookyaki (talk) 16:20, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

It is best to start a completely new article otherwise later editors may accidentaly revert to a version with the LLM generated content included. Rolluik (talk) 16:48, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Fair enough! Perfectly happy to do that. Spookyaki (talk) 17:12, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
But please rewrite this when you can @Spookyaki. I think @Rolluik's point is an important one. Thanks! Will (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Rewrite

Hi! Unsure if this page is going to be kept now or not, but I am working on rewriting it in my sandbox here. Spookyaki (talk) 16:04, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay, took me longer than I expected, but the page has been updated. I am very open to criticism, as this is a pretty fraught topic with a lot going on. Spookyaki (talk) 22:48, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Nominator: Spookyaki (talk · contribs) 20:37, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. sterilization policies in Puerto Rico/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ThaddeusOrlando55 (talk · contribs) 23:49, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Saludos. A while back I reviewed another article by this user about something relating to women in the Hispanosphere, and since this has been awaiting a review for a few months, I think I'll give this one a review as well. I'm not sure how long this will take me, but I shall try to have it done within a week. ThaddeusOrlando55 (talk) 23:49, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi! So sorry, forgot to follow the review so didn't see that you had started. Will try to respond ASAP. Spookyaki (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Images

Four images here. Mostly fine, although I have a few points.

  • For the photo of the flags, a category for the American flag is missing.
    • Not 100% sure what category you're talking about, but think I added it! Spookyaki (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Regarding the Eugenics Conference poster (now there's a sequence of words I never expected to type), it would be nice if you had a source to link to, but if one is unavailable that is fine. My bigger question is where was this conference held? If it was in the United States, then I believe the tag PD-US and/or PD-1923 would apply.
    • That one was in the article before I started working on it. I'll go ahead and add a link. Seems like the proceedings were published in Baltimore in 1923, so added PD-expired. Spookyaki (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Is the author of the Uncle Sam cartoon or where it was first published known? If not, it's fine, the sourcing is still above board, but I thought I'd ask. Also, I believe the image would fall into Category:Uncle Sam in propaganda and/or Category:Uncle Sam in political cartoons.
    • Cannot easily find much information about its publication. Added categories. Spookyaki (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • For the Clinton photo, categories are missing identifying categories for Bill and Chelsea Clinton. I believe Category:Bill Clinton in 2008 and Category:Chelsea Clinton in 2008 would be appropriate.

Sources

26 sources in total (I think that I counted correctly. I did it three times, and I'm not doing it again lest I lose my marbles.). Ten books, ten journal articles, three encyclopedia articles, one United Nations treaty, one newspaper article, and one thesis. A few notes.

  • For the Ayala and Bernabe book, I suggest that you add the JSTOR access and the DOI. I can also do it if you'd like.
  • Regarding Bashford and Levine, see above regarding the DOI. Also, you may wish to link this page. Again, I can do it if you'd like.
  • For Briggs 2002, see above regarding JSTOR.
  • I don't have access to the 2005 Cabán article, the Peterson article, or the Stone article, so I shall assume good faith and ask you for clarification if I have questions about those.
  • The link to the Genocide Convention Treaty is dead.
  • On Lopez, see above regarding link and JSTOR.
  • Is this the Young Lords Reader that is cited? If so, you may wish to link it, and also, it doesn't appear (based on that pdf) that Iris Morales was an editor, she apparently co-wrote the forward. If you wish to include her as an editor (I see that Darrel Enck-Wanzer credited her in the acknowledgements), you should then also include Denise Oliver-Velez since Enck-Wanzer thanked her and she co-wrote the forward.
    • Added the link. Removed Morales. Spookyaki (talk) 01:17, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Regarding Ramírez de Arellano and Seipp, you may wish to add the OCLC and this link.
  • For Robinson, JSTOR and link.
  • Sotomayor 2020 is a PhD thesis. I checked the relevant rules, and theses are allowed but with caution. Glancing at the thesis, it looks above-board, though because it is cited extensively (14 times) I feel I should prod a bit. Is Sotomayor an expert on the topic/has she published further on the topic? Either way, it is fine, the thesis can be used, but I felt I should inquire.
    • I cannot find much else, though I think she provides valuable information and the thesis seems well-researched. Spookyaki (talk) 01:17, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • For Whalen and Vázquez-Hernández, JSTOR.
  • On Whaley Eager, the DOI.

Prose, grammar, etc.

Lead

  • Influenced by neo-Malthusian principles, the United States and local Puerto Ricans first attempted to address the perceived problem of "overpopulation" in Puerto Rico. Since you already described is as "perceived", does "overpopulation" need to be in quotation marks? Also, link overpopulation.
    • Removed quotes. Would argue that linking overpopulation would be WP:OVERLINK, but I'll leave up to you. Spookyaki (talk) 01:17, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
  • This article, using a framework put forth by researcher Susan G. Enberg and based on the work of pediatrician Helen Rodríguez Trías, defines "birth control" as a voluntary and reversible procedure, "negative eugenics" as a policy that aims to purify society based on class or race, and "population control" as a set of policies, often coercive, aimed at hindering or completely preventing people from having children. I think you can simplify that. You could just say that Enberg, based on Rodríguez Trías' research, defines A as X and so on. I think the reader will understand that these are the definitions used for this page without needing to specify it. Also, link population control.
  • This article, after obstetrician and gynecologist Herbert B. Peterson, uses "sterilization" to refer to a form of birth control that is intended to leave a person permanently unable to have children. Same point as above.
  • In the late 1960s, the Puerto Rican government began offering tubal ligations to women at free or reduced cost. I believe that should be "costs". Also, link government of Puerto Rico.
  • Many of these procedures were performed under duress and without informed consent, and poor women were often pressured to undergo the procedure. Link informed consent.
  • This practice continued into at least the early 1970s, though reports on its prevalence afterward vary. To clarify, does this mean that sterilizations continued, or that coercion specifically continued?
  • However, these rates eventually fell in the 1990s as United States foreign policy shifted from a population control paradigm towards one of reproductive rights and Puerto Rican women began to prefer other birth control methods. I know Puerto Rico isn't technically part of the U.S., and this applied to more places than just PR, but does this really count as "foreign" policy in the case of PR?
  • Knowledge of historical sterilization policies is inconsistent in Puerto Rico. I'm wondering if this can be phrased better since that reads a bit oddly to me. Glancing at the legacy section, it appears that the topic is under-discussed in Puerto Rico, but that knowledge of it has increased in recent years. You may wish to rephrase it like that.

Background

  • At around the same time, the idea of eugenics was becoming popular. I think you can just say "Around the same time".
  • While Malthus, a clergyman, argued for abstinence and postponed marriages as a means of population control, these "neo-Malthusians" advocated for the use of birth control. Link abstinence.
  • However, by the 1910s, eugenicists like Paul Popenoe were advocating for the use of some forms of Malthusian "negative eugenics" Is it necessary to specifically mention Popenoe? He doesn't come up again in the article and unless he specifically influenced the Puerto Rican sterilizations I don't see how he's particularly relevant.
  • During the 1920s, a debate about birth control methods began in Puerto Rico. On the one hand, local feminists, socialists, and other activists founded The League for the Control of Natality and the Birth Control League of Puerto Rico to support birth control programs. Link feminism.
  • On the other hand, the Nationalist Party of Puerto Rico, led by Pedro Albizu Campos, argued that birth control was a form of genocide aimed at imposing Anglo-Saxon gender values on Puerto Rico by allowing women to inappropriately take control of families. Given how the term genocide did not exist until the 1940s and you described this as occurring in the 1920s, I don't see how that is possible.
  • While Puerto Rico continued to produce export crops for the United States, its food system deteriorated. This caused fears about overpopulation to grow even more. Among Americans/officials in the United States, among local Puerto Ricans, or both?
  • Many Puerto Ricans migrated to the mainland United States—about 58,000 between 1920 and 1940. Link stateside Puerto Ricans.

History

To be continued

Legacy and historiography

Overall

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI