User talk:Rolluik

Hello, Rolluik! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

More information Getting Started, Getting Help ...

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Close

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 16:15, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

I am an account holder since 2009. Usually only edit as an IP since I'm not interested in my contrib count; just reliable edits. AI is here and contrib counts don't pay the rent. If a human does the work; it will have to be paid in the AI age or the AI will need to get wages which goto the citizens?

Anyway, I appreciate you left the NPOV tag on the Religion in Finland page as focusing the article on the least populous religion is itself a major POV issue. Per WP:Undue. 35.129.1.72 (talk) 03:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Christianity, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

I much prefer to redirect music artists to other artists or the city in which they're located. Would you object to me redirecting this to Punta del Este? Bearian (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

No problem, go ahead. I thought about redirecting there but it isn't mentioned there, so I decided against it. Rolluik (talk) 22:00, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

If you don't mind, I redirected this to the Archdiocese article, in lieu of deleting it. Bearian (talk) 17:38, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

No, that is fine. Rolluik (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the clarify tag: you were entirely right, the source referred to the 1952 election and not the 1957 election. I have now fixed it! :) TheUzbek (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for your recent participation in AfD. I would like to hear your thoughts about the process. Please check this survey if you are willing to respond. FYI I found your participation via XTools.Czarking0 (talk) 02:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Can we edit the sentence to your suggestion? Firekong1 (talk) 03:04, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, would you mind talking a look at these two articles? Another editor and I cannot agree on how to word some of the language to be both accurate and POV neutral. I think it is best if other editors weigh in and make the decisions. SeminarianJohn (talk) 01:09, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

I stated that the statistics in Iran are undoubtedly distorted, which is not incorrect. There is conflicting information. Firekong1 (talk) 01:27, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

I don't think you are incorrect. Undoubtedly distorted and distorted just means the same thing. Rolluik (talk) 10:44, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Alright. May I edit it or should I leave it as the same? Firekong1 (talk) 12:27, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

I think it is fine now. Rolluik (talk) 14:45, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Alright then. Personally, I think it should just say “distorted” than anything else. Firekong1 (talk) 15:49, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Illegal immigration § Requested move 25 February 2026. Edittttor (talk) 20:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Rolluik. What do you think about? DayakSibiriak (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Morocco, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brill and Bethel University were added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

At Italy page you changed the year for religious figures, can you provide the new source as well? Barjimoa (talk) 20:21, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

I have done so, but there isn't really a new source: someone forgot to update the year when they added the current source. The numbers are correct. Rolluik (talk) 22:37, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Italy&diff=1062419599&oldid=1062381197 Here is were the mistake was made, the numbers are correct. The editor was later banned but not for anything related to this. Rolluik (talk) 22:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Azerbaijan, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

https://alsadatravels.com/muslim-population/muslim-population-china-complete-guide Is this a valid source i can use to edit the page? Brokeshotmet3r (talk) 20:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

I wouldn't use it since it just repeats the census results. In that case it is better to cite the census directly instead. The projections shouldn't be used because it is not an outlet/scientist that is able to do that well. Rolluik (talk) 20:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Brokeshotmet3r (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

The first 4 references they use, are reliable and can be used. Rolluik (talk) 20:43, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

i used GOV UK as a source is that ok? Brokeshotmet3r (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/china-country-policy-and-information-notes/country-policy-and-information-note-muslims-including-uyghurs-in-xinjiang-july-2022-accessible Brokeshotmet3r (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Yes. If you are using it for something controversial or opinion, consider attribution. For example: according to a UK government report... Rolluik (talk) 21:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I found an article which states: "Last year the term was in vogue after a now discredited report by YouGov and the Bible Society suggested a significant rise in churchgoing, particularly among young men. Despite the figures of the report being flawed, churches up and down the country did in fact report signs of increased interest. The latest intervention from the RACD adds to this trend." (source link->Young army recruits increasingly turning to God, chaplains suggest - Christian Today) Should this information be added to the British and Foreign Bible Society article? Lazarbeem (talk) 16:25, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Maybe if it is worded like "According to Christian Today..." but I wouldn't since the numbers are relatively small in the recruits example and there isn't a clear comparison with earlier data. The only hard data comparison is "In Army Training Centre Pirbright, recruit baptisms rose by over a third (37.5 per cent) between 2024 and 2025." but this is just one training centre (there are probably more) and just 2 years with unclear absolute numbers. The article is also focused on the Royal Army Chaplains’ Department where baptism figures are more relevant than in the BFBS article. I also wouldn't use any newspaper articles from before the retraction. Rolluik (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Okay Lazarbeem (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2026 (UTC)