User talk:100.1.2.26
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
- Introductory tutorial
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- The Teahouse
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (100.1.2.26) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.
Again, welcome! Peaceray (talk) 04:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
May 2025
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spiritual successor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
July 2025
Hi 100.1.2.26! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. UmbyUmbreon (talk) 03:39, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- I only brought back certain parts of my original edit, not the entire thing 100.1.2.26 (talk) 11:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter, the edit warring policy still applies for partial reversions as well. UmbyUmbreon (talk) 23:15, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Matrix Revolutions plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 23:32, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- That was not intentional. I tried to replace the name of the film with a simpler phrase, but I did it incorrectly 100.1.2.26 (talk) 23:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:27, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
Hello, I'm DonQuixote, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Superman Returns, it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 23:19, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 20:37, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Genuinely what the hell was "disruptive" about it???? 100.1.2.26 (talk) 21:17, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at The Matrix Revolutions. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Adamstom.97. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thor: Ragnarok have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. adamstom97 (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- You're literally wrong. Every sequel page has notes about what happened in the previous films. You're opinion about there being too many doesn't change that 100.1.2.26 (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2025 (UTC)