User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4

	mery cristmas
	and a hapy noo yeer (I am a highly skilled typist like yourself) Giraffer (talk) 00:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

*<<<<=^[1] >:o===Q<^[2] (why thank you)

References

1234qwer1234qwer4 00:31, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello 1234qwer1234qwer4: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 13:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Abishe (talk) 13:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

The redirect 1LLL has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 25 § 1LLL until a consensus is reached. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Stickerless has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 25 § Stickerless until a consensus is reached. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:08, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

I have semi-protected this page for a few days. JBW (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Lithuanian Cyrillic has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 3 § Lithuanian Cyrillic until a consensus is reached. Janhrach (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

…may I suggest massXFD. It has saved me a LOT of time. Plant🌱man (talk) 18:22, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I might try to use it next time. I guess the only thing it will not do automatically is populate my XfD log. Also, looks like it does not work in the Modern skin, so I will have to switch for using the script, but that is not a big surprise. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:26, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Well, glad I could help anyway. Plant🌱man (talk) 18:36, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your guidance in the request for discussion regarding appropriate venue for discussing a Nantes University redirect. I'd like to solicit your advice on a related question: how to request official guidelines for naming articles about universities.

There are several possible naming conventions for university articles. For example: "University of Nantes", "Nantes University", "Université de Nantes" or "Nantes Université". The current guidance seems contradictory: one approach suggests using the most common name in English-language sources, which would be "Université de Nantes", while another suggests following the pattern established by well-known universities, where "Sorbonne University" would suggest "Nantes University" as the appropriate format.

I've observed that the predominant practice on English Wikipedia is to use the English descriptor "University" in article titles about universities that have names in other languages, but this convention isn't officially documented anywhere. I also cannot find specific guidance on when exceptions might be appropriate.

My question is: would it be best to simply create an article at Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(universities), or is there another way to go about this? MyPOV (talk) 07:48, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Why is your username so like… that? HQIQ (talk) 07:10, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4/Archive 2020#Random question because I've never met you before. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:55, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, please check the email sent to you on the meta wiki. Radinll (talk) 12:13, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, please read the email i sent to you on the meta wiki with Titled "Hello" and answer it. Radinll (talk) 04:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, please read the email i sent to you on the meta wiki with Titled "Hello" and answer it. Radinll (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

1234qwer1234qwer4,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 03:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 03:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grothendieck topology, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nilradical was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi 1234qwer1234qwer4. Thank you for your work on Realme C2. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

The article was started by @JGBlue1509. 1234qwer1234qwer4 07:43, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello there, administrator! I have been recently unblocked in English Wikipedia and would like to be unblocked from Wikipedia Commons as well. I have been blocked by Daphne Lantier for abusing multiple accounts. I understand the offense of sockpuppetry but please do believe me that I have no recollection of having another account in both English and Commons. I understand that sockpuppetry is a behavior that cannot be condoned in Wikipedia and Commons and pledge to never do such a thing. I hope you understand that I want to continue contributing both in English Wikipedia and Commons. Thank you very much! Shana Shana (talk) 04:59, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

@Shana Shana, you can now request an unblock on your talk page there. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Much appreciated. Shana Shana (talk) 05:39, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Heath Mitchell Quinn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 7 § Heath Mitchell Quinn until a consensus is reached. Joeykai (talk) 00:53, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the author links to mathematical historians. When you go through a few dozen pages back to back and add the same author link to every one, would you mind adding the name of the person you are author-linking to your edit summary, instead of just writing "link"? Maybe something like "citation author link: John Doe". Also, if you could mark these as "minor edits" that would be great. –jacobolus (t) 16:21, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

I can surely adjust the edit summary (though sooner or later I am going to forget updating it when switching to the next author). The reason why I was not flagging them as minor is that I make the edits manually, and at a larger scale it feels like I will inevitably miss something, like adding the parameter to the wrong author (I've caught such a mistake in my own edits a few times already), and for minor edits the likelihood that this would get spotted quickly would be lower. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

I think you should mark edits that just add a wikilink or two as minor even if you think there might be a mistake. Help:Minor edit explicitly lists "Adding or correcting wikilinks" as something to mark as minor.

Anyway, thanks! –jacobolus (t) 20:51, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

If you don't want to include the author name(s), you could also use an edit summary like "wikilink author(s) in citation template(s)" (or you can probably make up a more elegant phrasing). –jacobolus (t) 20:53, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

I'd prefer to include the author name probably; that would be more accurate since it's only in citation templates in maybe 95 % of the cases :-). 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:54, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for all of the author links, by the way. Those are great! –jacobolus (t) 22:56, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! There's way more to do there than I thought... 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:59, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to -maxxing. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:54, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for appreciating the manual work required to add author link parameters in templates that are formatted differently in each article. I'm sure your workflow of applying bot-like cosmetic edits to thousands of pages is too busy to simply fix one slip-up of mine, so I'm glad you took the time to undo my edit and place a template on my talk page. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:13, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Seriously? I took the time to notify you of a mistake that you made and rather than appreciating that you get all butt hurt? Says MUCH more about you than about me... Keep up the absolutely stellar work. We all bow down to your prowess. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:14, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

At this edit and this edit, your script broke the {{cite web}} templates that it edited because it added |work= to templates that already had |website=. cs1|2 templates do not support multiple simultaneous |work= alias parameters. The |work= alias parameters are:

|journal=, |magazine=, |newspaper=, |periodical=, |website=, |work=

—Trappist the monk (talk) 00:24, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

I noticed this subsequently (but did not bother fixing it since it was only two pages and I know there are people watching the maintenance categories), and I am done with the task so there is no "script" to fix anymore. Thanks for correcting the ref errors; however, I do not think it is fair to say that I "broke" them since on the latter page, |website=7 July 2025 was passed as a template parameter (before my edit), which should be an error on its own (insource:/website *= *[0-3]?[0-9] (January|February|March|April|May|June|July|August|September|October|November|December) [1-2][0-9]{3}/ times out but returns at least 40 results), while on the former page, the redundancy already existed before my edit but did not trigger the error because the website had been incorrectly entered into the "publisher" field. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:09, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

The redirect 名 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 21 § 名 until a consensus is reached. consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:22, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 23 § Ligovsky Avenue until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:03, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

It's very difficult trying to improve the context of a Wikipedia article when a hubris editor takes it upon himself to erase someone else's hard work simply because he suspects LLM use without proof. The assumption is always that a human is incapable of making structured improvements unless he is in the same hubris level as the one making the judgement call. You did not even specify that the added entry was erroneous or non-factual or totally made-up. Many other entries i see were haphazardly lifted from cited sources, but it appears that clumsy paragraphs are more human and therefore judged as encyclopedic by hubris editors. NegativeOi (talk) 14:05, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, but LLM use is also confirmed by Pangram. This is not about structured improvements; the wording and formatting are rather telling. I also did specify that the content addition is redundant to the already existing section Strange matter#Context. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

		The Half Barnstar
		Thanks so much for going through and cleaning up after my typo. You finished the half of the request I should have gotten right the first time around. VanIsaac, GHTV contrabout 02:13, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. It happens that this is very much not the first time I had to perform a mass-move, so I already had a script written for it years ago. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:15, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chromoprotein, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apoprotein was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

For the redirects with mismatched parentheses and other similar errors: if they were moved away from that title quickly you can just G6 them, it's what I did with the batch I went through from your query. Even if they're old "obviously created in error" has no age requirement. Rusalkii (talk) 06:21, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, sometimes I forget for some reason, though I have been using it. In this case, the "Pan African Youth Movemnt" was the page title for two months though, the page move history at the "Parliement of Iran" article (especially by Cyrus-green) was quite confusing, and "United States Treasury Departmet" was created without a page move. Thanks for working on that query! 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:58, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

You used them in editing Template:Charity-stub, Template:PRChina-stub, Template:Melilla-geo-stub, Template:PRChina-struct-stub, Template:PRChina-geo-stub. I've dropped the protection of two of those since it wasn't justified, but even then you have to respect what our admins have done even if you disagree. Thanks. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:41, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Hm, sorry about that. I'm not sure I know how to make JWB notify me if I'm editing a page that I shouldn't be... 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:44, 5 September 2026 (UTC)