User talk:1DHNK1

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Unibrow, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, 1DHNK1,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Renaming afghanistan, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:101553813 panjshir.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:101553813 panjshir.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

I need someone to pronounce اوږد in the Wardak dialect [with foucs on ʝ] so I can upload it to the dialects page. Also from the Wardak dialect pronouncing any words with ږ ښ. If you speak any other dialect upload any words with ښ ږ څ ځ ژ. If you upload the file on Wikimedia Commons and post it to my talk page specifying ur dialect - I will add it to the dialects page. Its to raise awareness on Pashto dialects

PashtoAdder4 (talk) 20:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry brother, my pashto is not the best even though it being my mother tongue, I cant help here. 1DHNK1 (talk) 11:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 00:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

To be blunt, if you come back in a week when this block expires and you start edit warring again, your next block will be indefinite. No more warnings. If you can't build a consensus on the talk page for your edits, then you need to move on to something else. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:10, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

What about the other party? Are they not included in this edit war and therefore should receive the same warning? I made the edits and gave my reasoning, you can check the original article. And I also went on the talk page to talk about the issue with the other party but I got no response from them. I’ve been on Wikipedia for 8 years using my own personal time to contribute here so I don’t appreciate you threatening to ban me permanently, I don’t think that’s fair.

Regarding the edit war, I accept I was at fault for that but the edits I made, I stand by them. 1DHNK1 (talk) 06:09, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

See WP:NOTTHEM. This is about you and no one else. No party was close to making as many reverts as you. You went way past 3RR. In fact, you were the only one reverting to your preferred version, so you were editing against consensus. Everyone on Wikipedia is a volunteer, so your situation isn't unique. As far as a threat? It's not a threat. It's a simple fact: if you continue to be disruptive, there is no reason to let you continue to edit here, so you will be blocked. "Indefinite" is not "permananent". Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:34, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Ofcourse I’m gonna end up breaching the rule when the first person called the other two to back him against me, so 3 against 1. Let’s not pretend such things don’t happen and that everyone here is unbiased. The article has clear incorrect information, it was not me randomly removing stuff to cause disruption. I gave reasoning for the edits, not once these other 3 guys addressed them. And I’m not here trying to appeal the ban so I don’t know why you’re telling me to talk about myself only. I already accepted that it was my fault for reverting more than 3 times and now I see some articles are taken over by groups of people that work together, it’s either their way or the highway.

indefinite or permanent, what’s the difference then. Both leads to same thing. 1DHNK1 (talk) 12:58, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Here's an idea: how about you don't attempt to force your version through until you have built consensus on the talk page? If no one responds, then that's a good indication that no one is interested in your proposal and the current consensus remains. See WP:AVOIDEDITWAR and WP:CONACHIEVE for some ideas on how to handle this. Or, you can simply walk away from that topic and find another article to edit. Finally, there is a big difference. See this essay: WP:Indefinite is not infinite. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:23, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1DHNK1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello, I understand that my edits have been viewed as edit warring, but I want to clarify that this was not my intention. I genuinely believe the edits improve the article, and I provided reasoning, though I now see I should have handled disagreements differently. Saying that, I did try to communicate about these edits on the talk page but instead received no reply and was instead reported.

I acknowledge that reverting multiple times is disruptive, and I should have relied more on the Talk page and other dispute resolution methods instead of continuing to edit. I am committed to avoiding edit warring in the future.

I ask that you please review my contributions in good faith. I have been editing for 8 years, especially on Central Asian topics that often receive less attention, and I want to continue contributing constructively. If unblocked, I will make sure to discuss contested changes on the Talk page and respect consensus.

Thank you for considering this request. 1DHNK1 (talk) 03:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We don't consider AI-generated appeals (100% likelihood per GPTZero). You are blocked, not AI, therefore you need to tell us why you think you should be unblocked. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:20, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1DHNK1 (talk) 03:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

I see that my formal writing has heen flagged as AI, I can assure you that it was written by me and I am not a bot or AI. GPTzero is not an accurate tool for measuring whats written by AI, no such software currently exists that has zero margin for error. Anyways, I will repeat myself again regarding the ban. My edits were made in good faith and clear reasoning was given. I tried to approach the other parties on the talk page but did not hear anything back from them. Instead my edits were reverted without addressing the reasons I gave for my edits and I was reported. I acknowledge I should not have continued with the edit warring and I understand it was disruptive but as I said before my intentions were not that and I believe my edits improve the article. Please review this ban again. Thank. 1DHNK1 (talk) 08:45, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

I've also put your text through ZeroGPT, which similarly tells me that it is more likely than not at least mostly AI-generated. But be that as it may, your appeal needs to convince us that you understand why you have been blocked, and what you need to do differently going forward, and whether your appeal was generated with AI, or gave me the impression that it was, either way it didn't convince me of anything. So if you did really write your appeal entirely yourself, then you should try a different tack.

If you do wish to appeal again, you need to lodge a new request using the same unblock template as before, otherwise it won't appear in the administrators' feed (and in any case please don't edit the template content once it's been closed). --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:05, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

• Wikipedia's policy on edit warring is, basically, "don't edit war", not "don't edit war unless you are convinced that you are right". Indeed, it would be completely meaningless to have an edit warring policy which exempted any editor who was convinced that they were right, as in most edit wars everybody involved thinks they are right. JBW (talk) 14:10, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

  Fair enough I made the mistake and I’m not gonna appeal it. But my question is this, if I make an edit and give reasoning for it. Then that edit gets reverted back without a proper explanation, and then me and the other party both go back and fourth reverting, doesn’t that make both of us guilty of breaking this rule and therefore both get the same punishment? 1DHNK1 (talk) 06:04, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

  Regarding the series of edits to Tajiks on August 31, there were three editors reverting your edits, none of whom breached the WP:3RR which is an acid test of edit warring. Whereas you made the original edit(s), which were reverted, and then you reverted the reversion five times, all within a space of <6 hrs. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:43, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

  Yeah the original one who reverted my edits, called the other two to join on his side. Anyways it is what it is. 1DHNK1 (talk) 11:08, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

  That also means that, as well as edit warring, you were editing contrary to consensus. JBW (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

I have two things to say in connection with your recent comments here.

1. You say that one editor "called" two others to support them by edit warring on their behalf. That is a very serious accusation, and if true will warrant a very long block. What is the evidence for that? (I am assuming you do have evidence to prove it, but if you don't then it will be best for you to retract the allegation now.)
2. I note that you have stated that "Ofcourse" [sic] you are going to edit-war again if the same situation occurs. Openly stating your intention of editing in violation of policies is a pretty effective way of making sure not only that any future block will be indefinite, but also that it's likely to remain permanently. JBW (talk) 16:31, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

   Regarding number 1, it should be on the talk page of one of the other party’s involved. And point 2 where did I say I’m going to edit war? I said in a situation where it’s me against 3 others, “ofcourse” ill end up breaking the 3 reverts policy.

   anyways let’s leave it here. I don’t wanna go back and fourth over this. 1DHNK1 (talk) 23:54, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

You have made an accusation of serious misconduct against several editors. Either provide the evidence on which you have based that accusation, or withdraw the accusation. Doing that is not optional: unsubstantiated accusations of this kind are contrary to Wikipedia's policy on personal attacks. It is not enough to say where you think the evidence "should be"; you need to say where it is. If your accusation was based on evidence then it shouldn't be difficult to say where you saw that evidence; if, on the other hand, it was not based on evidence then it won't be difficult to say that it wasn't, and withdraw the allegation. Either way, please settle this before you do any more editing. JBW (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Go check the talk page of the user called historyofIran. Check the history incase it’s been removed. That’s all I’m gonna say on this whole topic, I acknowledged my mistake that I made and accepted my one week ban so please no need for further lectures. Thanks 1DHNK1 (talk) 19:16, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, because of your refusal to comply with Wikipedia's policy on personal attacks. Any administrator will be welcome to remove the block once you have either provided the evidence on which you based your accusation or withdrawn that accusation. You have made the accusation, and it is up to you to say where, if anywhere, you got the information, not up to other people to search for it. You can give a diff if you know how to, and if you don't then you can give the name of the editor, the page on which they made the edit, and the time at which they did so.

When you have either substantiated or withdrawn your accusation, you are welcome to ping me, and I will unblock you. Alternatively, if you prefer, you can post an unblock request as explained to you before, but that is likely to be a much slower way of getting unlocked. JBW (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

@JBW I think they were referring to this.. Jesus isGreat7 09:18, 16 September 2025 (UTC)