User talk:71.176.76.206

April 2022

Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John Katko—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Andethyst (talk) 01:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to John Katko. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Andethyst (talk) 01:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Harry Baals—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 23:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wood stork, you may be blocked from editing. Dave.Dunford (talk) 03:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Goat tower has been reverted.
Your edit here to Goat tower was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://goatsimulator.fandom.com/wiki/Goat_Tower) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2022

Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Derf Backderf have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CodeTalker (talk) 00:50, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I know my guy, one of my mates did that when he was over, I reverted it dumbass

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Baals. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 03:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gina Carano. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 23:54, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

I got a warning

I got a warning and you blocked me for changing the color of someones name tf lmaooo 71.176.76.206 (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes, see WP:TPO. -- LuK3 (Talk)

And so what? This is my page, I’m not doing anything offensive or hurting anyone. I could hurt you if I want.

November 2022

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

-- LuK3 (Talk) 00:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Ignazio Cassis, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John and Lorena Bobbitt—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 01:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ... discospinster _talk 01:35, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Eunice aphroditois. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. The phrase "most notable" violates MOS:PUFFERY without a citation. Peaceray (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hammer-headed bat, you may be blocked from editing. Peaceray (talk) 03:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

None of the other names were sourced 71.176.76.206 (talk) 13:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I have negative & positive reactions to that. First, please see the WP:WHATABOUT section in the WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions essay. While that page is about deletion discussions in general, the section makes the point that making the argument that one can do something improperly because it was done improperly elsewhere is a poor argument. Something that requires a citation still needs a citation, even if something else has not been properly cited elsewhere. Second, to your point, while there were plenty of mentions of hammer-headed fruit bat in the footnotes, it itself was not cited, & big-lipped bat was not mentioned anywhere. Thank you for pointing that out. I have now fixed that with a citation.^[1] Peaceray (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

References

[1]
"Is the Hammer-Headed Bat a Real Animal?". ThoughtCo. 2018-10-25. Retrieved 2023-06-14.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

User talk:71.176.76.206

April 2022

May 2022

September 2022

October 2022

November 2022

I got a warning

November 2022

January 2023

June 2023

July 2023

Welcome!

May 2025

Related Articles