User talk:A bunch of penguins
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello, A bunch of penguins, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 09:42, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your welcome Randykitty :-) I do have a question (on your talk page it says to reply here, so I'm trying here rather than there). I was planning on contributing by creating some new articles in the English Wikipedia about notable things that already have a German Wikipedia page. I got a start with Linneper Hof, which existed already but had a bad translation and a request for fixing it. (The original article in German was not ideal, though, so it wasn't much fun...) I would like to try the Content Translation tool, but it doesn't extend to editors with my level of experience. Is it possible to be added early? A bunch of penguins (talk) 10:37, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hiya, just a quick note that I tagged the redirect Wikipedia:Elmar Schrüfer for deletion as an error. I saw your post on the NPP talk page but unfortunately I don't have that much time at the minute to really read, understand, and write a reply to the message. I'm also a bit inactive on NPP work and think it's best to leave it to the others.
- To answer the question above, I dabbled with translation when I first started and was quite excited too about trying the tool when I got to extended confirmed. A community discussion opted to disable the machine translation portion of the tool quite a while ago though and honestly I don't think it is that useful from what I can recall playing with it a while ago. While you can request the permission, it is rarely granted and it's probably easier to do what you are doing right now anyways. Also, don't forget to ping users when replying to notify them if they're not watching/monitoring the page. Welcome back to Wikipedia and I hope you enjoy your time editing! Justiyaya 12:00, 9 May 2025 (UTC) (please ping on reply)
- Thanks Justiyaya! @Justiyaya:
- The part that I would really like help with is (hopefully automatic) translation of the citations. But I've found that if I paste the text into my sandbox and wait a day, there's a bot that will adjust them. On the other hand, a lot of the time the citations in the German wikipedia aren't sufficient, so I end up redoing them anyway...
- One reason I wouldn't mind integrated machine translation is for the wikilinks - at least when there is already an inter-language link, it would be cool if the machine translation took that into account. Anyway, I'd like to try it out, but I'm sort of getting into a groove, and I'm fine to wait until I've reached whatever number of edits and days it takes to get access. I have to go read what ping is now :-) a bunch of penguins (talk) 15:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- WP:PING @Randykitty so this has a better chance of being seen. I don't think most editors watchlist pages when adding templates like this. –Novem Linguae (talk) 12:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! a bunch of penguins (talk) 15:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi! I have no experience with this tool. In the (few) cases that I have edited translations, I used Google translate as a start, then edited the text into correct English, and then looked at the sourcing, removing anything that was badly or even not sourced. In general, I don't like translating much, as other Wikis generally have much less stringent sourcing rules than enWP. I prefer writing the article from scratch, using other language versions as a source for references. Hope this helps. If you have further questions, I recommend that you try the Village Pump. Happy editing! --Randykitty (talk) 16:12, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks @Randykitty :-)
- I'm happy with a mix of translating and creating from scratch. One of the things I like about translations is that it they give you a hint of what to look for (e.g. finding book titles or awards lacking citations is easier when you already know the person published it or was awarded it). a bunch of penguins (talk) 16:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Empty sections at Wikipedia:Requests for page importation
Hello, thanks for your requests there, but when you're creating a new request, you're adding a duplicate section header (example). To fix this, avoid writing anything in the subject/headline field, as counterintuitive as that may seem. Graham87 (talk) 15:14, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Whoops, sorry about that! Will try to remember to leave it blank from now on! a bunch of penguins (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elisabeth Bauser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solution. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Odette Wegwarth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foundation.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Eva-Maria Beck-Meuth (June 13)

- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eva-Maria Beck-Meuth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, A bunch of penguins!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HerBauhaus (talk) 13:38, 13 June 2025 (UTC) |
To AfC or not
Hi. I just wanted to check that you know that you're not obliged to go through the AfC process, and that you can just move pages from draft to mainspace yourself if you think they're ready? (this is re the back and forth about Beck-Meuth). Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 11:34, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks @SunloungerFrog, I appreciate your message. I normally do put articles in the mainspace directly myself once they are ready, but this was a sort of experiment to learn how the experience of AfC review compares to NPP review. I think it's odd that we have both NPP and AfC, although I know that's a pretty longstanding tradition. Putting articles directly into mainspace when they are done is far more satisfying than waiting until someone looks at them... a bunch of penguins (talk) 12:04, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Eva-Maria Beck-Meuth has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ldm1954 (talk) 12:23, 20 June 2025 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi A bunch of penguins. Thank you for your work on Eva-Maria Beck-Meuth. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Please add infobox scientist
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Ldm1954 (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Ldm1954: Thanks! I've added the infobox. That's the first time I've done that, so please let me know if something looks wrong. a bunch of penguins (talk) 17:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
| Welcome back to Wikipedia! I was checking out some of the pages you started, and they were really quite nice reads. I'm glad you're here, cheers from North Carolina! 🙂 Johnson524 17:07, 20 July 2025 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot for your note @Johnson524! a bunch of penguins (talk) 15:38, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jutta Günther (economist)
Hello, A bunch of penguins. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jutta Günther (economist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jutta Günther (economist)

Hello, A bunch of penguins. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jutta Günther".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
