User talk:Acoolusername2025

Hi Acoolusername2025, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! MimirIsSmart (talk) 06:30, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Indianapolis FedEx shooting, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Lol Acoolusername2025 (talk) 23:03, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Maina Ramulu, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:30, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

My bad. Acoolusername2025 (talk) 16:54, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:49, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Why is it copyright if it's a transcription of a letter released by the police (which should be considered public domain)? Acoolusername2025 (talk) 19:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Chess enjoyer. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Elliot Rodger that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Insult by Acoolusername2025 @ Talk:Elliot Rodger. TarnishedPath^talk 23:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

This comment made by you is highly inappropriate and directly violates our Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks policies. If you continue to make such violations, you will likely be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User:Acoolusername2025, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is an "attack page" or an unsourced biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
  Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity, or articles about living people that are entirely negative and unsourced. Attack pages, attack files and negative unreferenced BLPs are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:22, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Acoolusername2025,

If you want your main User page deleted, please tag it CSD U1. I don't think you intended it to be deleted when you removed the content some editors found objectionable. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:57, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Breivik during the last day of his appeal case in Borgarting Court of Appeal at Telemark prison in Skien, Norway, in 2017.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. applecuckoo (he/him) 06:05, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Lol a German tabloid site had it listed as CC. Still, I apologize. I should've reverse-image-searched it. Acoolusername2025 (talk) 08:29, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Breivik during the last day of his appeal case in Borgarting Court of Appeal at Telemark prison in Skien, Norway, in 2017.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 14:46, 10 February 2026 (UTC)