User talk:Agrievedaughter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Serial (radio and television) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Serial (radio and television) was changed by Agrievedaughter (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881954 on 2025-06-09T23:44:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Tammi (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interviews, press releases/announcements are primary sources so cannot be used to establish notability. What I suggest doing is looking for sources in the articles about the films, especially the critical reviews and summarize what they say about Tammi/Tammi's work. S0091 (talk) 17:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emma Tammi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Agrievedaughter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Tammi has been accepted

Emma Tammi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 18:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:45, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

The Manual of Style says "The summary should not exceed this range unless the film's structure is unconventional, such as with non-linear storylines, or unless the plot is too complicated to summarize in this range." The Final Reckoning has an extremely complicated plot and therefore deserves a longer plot summary.

Additionally, the previous plot summary was incomprehensible and incorrect. Instead of reverting my high-effort, good-faith, and accurate edit, you could easily have simply cut 250 words from it. My edit, unedited, is under 1,000 words, less than 300 over the range in the MoS, and the MoS literally states that if the plot is too complex to summarize accurately in 700 words, it can exceed it. I have submitted a 781 word version of my previous plot summary and am happy to discuss this matter further on the MI:TFR talk page. Agrievedaughter (talk) 05:12, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sabrina Seelig

Hello, Agrievedaughter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sabrina Seelig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:10, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sabrina Seelig

Hello, Agrievedaughter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sabrina Seelig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Agrievedaughter. Thank you for your work on Sabrina Seelig. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:04, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles