User talk:CEOs Beats

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sandrina England. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.

You must place an inline citation directly after:

• quotations;
• any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
• any material about living people.

Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:

• Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup.
• VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor.

Still AI text and formatting. In addition, under WP:NARTIST this will need more reliable sources. The main facts need supporting inline, per WP:BLP.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Sandrina England to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 06:47, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm a family friend I've verified AI data and in the latest version made it more human. CEOs Beats (talk) 08:11, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

In that case, since you're writing about someone you have an external ('off-Wiki') relationship with, you need to disclose this conflict of interest (COI). I will post a separate message below with instructions. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, CEOs Beats. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello Dear,

Rest assured there's no conflict of interest as this is a real person from a real artistic family. It's just that I only help in creating profiles for people and topics I'm 100% sure about, here's information about me https://xerowaste.godaddysites.com/founder CEOs Beats (talk) 12:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

There's no promotion we only want to document her great work. CEOs Beats (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Rest assured, when you're writing about a "family friend", as you describe her, there most certainly is at least a perceived, and quite likely actual, conflict of interest. Please disclose it properly. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello would you please guide me in steps. I already disclosed that there's no conflict of interest and there's press covering everything included. What else shall I do please? CEOs Beats (talk) 13:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

I meant to mention that these information and individual are real. CEOs Beats (talk) 13:15, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Nobody is saying that the information isn't true, or that the person isn't real. I'm not even saying you're trying to promote this person. I'm saying that you have an interest (conscious or subconscious) in portraying your friend in a positive light, or at least you wouldn't want to present her in a negative manner. Wikipedia meanwhile has an interest in information being presented in a neutral, unbiased manner. Those two interests can clash, or be in conflict with each other – hence, a conflict of interests.

The guidance is contained in the message above, on top of this section. Please read and understand it all, and in tangible terms, please make the disclosure as per the 3rd bullet point (starting with "disclose your..."). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:23, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello DoubleGrazin, true! Thanks for the clarification is this correct:

{{Connected contributor|User1=CEOs Beats|U1-declared=yes|U1-otherlinks=(Optional) disclosures, article drafts Sandrina England showing COI contributions.}}

check my profile please. CEOs Beats (talk) 13:41, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Dear DoubleGazing, I state that there's no affiliation. What's next? CEOs Beats (talk) 13:23, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Www.mtipx.eu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Merlin04^talk_contribs 03:16, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, it's just facts listing. What else I should add to avoid deletion? CEOs Beats (talk) 03:26, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Www.mtipx.eu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Schtiapht (talk) 14:50, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Www.mtipx.eu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. shane (talk to me if you want!) 14:51, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Can you tell me what your relationship is with MTiPX? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Employer, yet I've the declaration in my profile. CEOs Beats (talk) 15:08, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

If by "profile" you mean your userpage User:CEOs Beats, then that only says "An assistant account for MTiPX" which is so vague as to tell me nothing. You need to make a proper paid-editing-disclosure using the {{paid}} template.

And as to the real reason why I'm here: you're not allowed to publish articles directly in the main article space on subjects in which you have a conflict of interest, including but not only (although especially) where your COI is of the paid-editing nature. You must instead put your creations through the AfC review mechanism. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

No payments from MTiPX CEOs Beats (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

It's the owner of the same name no commercial editing involved CEOs Beats (talk) 16:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I've no idea what "It's the owner of the same name no commercial editing involved" means. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

If you're an employee, writing about your employer, then you are automatically considered a paid editor here, regardless of whether or not you're explicitly paid to edit Wikipedia. Just make the disclosure, please. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm not paid to edit MTiPX, I mean both CEOs Beat and The company MTiPX owned by the same person and it's not a commercial editing. It's a startup with significant impact that won an industry wide recognition for promoting wellbeing and sustainability. This part is not even mentioned yet because you've considered it commercial. So if a company is listing the achievements this ends up wrong. How can I provide evifdences of impact if I don't list the achievements? Guid me please. CEO Beats speaks about impact created on local and global levels it's another brand within MTiPX not a person it represented any individual who's the ceo of their own life and genuinely creates a better world. CEOs Beats (talk) 17:11, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm done debating this with you. Since you refuse to disclose your paid editing, then you are an undisclosed paid editor, and I've blocked you accordingly. If you wish to start complying with our T&Cs, you may be unblocked, but not before. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:20, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I think there's misunderstanding CEOs Beats (talk) 17:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I confirm that I understand that this is not a commercial space and that paid editor should have different account type. I will write objectively about topics that I'm sure about its content until I learn to edit and create topics that I know nothing at all about before creating a content. I've no intend and won't work for promoting companies and people. MTiPX impact is real, I was just awake at midnight and I thought it worth sharing. There's commercial pages who are red by business people why would I promote in Wikipedia? CEOs Beats (talk) 17:26, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I found a way to not make it look like commercial or promotional. I will add the references only without mentioning it in the text body, I think that is in alignment with the rules. Right!? CEOs Beats (talk) 17:07, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

---

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

I have placed nowiki tags around the {{Connected contributor}} template above because this page was being incorrectly placed in Category:Articles with connected contributors. CEOs Beats, that template only goes on the talk pages of articles, not your own talk page (or user page). ~2026-23318-08 (talk) 22:25, 15 April 2026 (UTC)