User talk:CharlieMehta

Hi CharlieMehta. Thank you for your work on Hezekiah Moscow. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you and much appreciated. Will keep improving the article. Charlie (talk) 07:46, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

what is you problem? Stop falsely accusing and abusing fellow editors without proof. I dont understand from where you poped up suddenly. I felt abused by u. I am not directly or indirectly compensated by any university on wikipedia or any university on planet Earth and planet Mars. If you are doing this to abuse and threaten fellow editors on the planet earth, Kindly stop wasting other editors time. Thanks.Univofbegumpet (talk) 15:34, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Univofbegumpet (talk) 13:48, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

@Univofbegumpet Thank you for your message. My edits were made in good faith to improve accuracy and neutrality, not to engage in edit warring. If you still have concerns, please feel free to report it. I am confident it will be reviewed fairly. For the time being, please refrain from editing KL University’s page until you explain why you are so keen to remove information stating that the university has been barred from NAAC accreditation for 5 years. Charlie (talk) 09:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

For your info, I have restored all details of NAAC Ban. If it is barred from NAAC keep it in the article, I dont have any problem with it. Why are you removing content contributed by me? without mentioning it in edit summaries? Furthermore, if you abuse me again on paid promotions I will complain. Pls explain ur issues in edit summaries, this falls under edit conflict on content not paid promotion. There is no paid promotion here, I am no way connected to any university. Univofbegumpet (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

@Univofbegumpet Please avoid presenting the edits in a way that may come across as overly assertive. I was the one who re-added the NAAC bribery case to the lead section after it had been removed multiple times earlier by you. It now seems to have been rearranged again (by you), along with the addition of the NIRF ranking, and also you are trying to present everything as your own edit in this conversation. It would be best if you refrain from editing the KL University page for the time being. If you have any queries, please respond on the KL University talk page as requested earlier. Charlie (talk) 10:04, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:48, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld Count me in and thanks for sharing. Charlie (talk) 02:13, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 WazirX hack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 WazirX hack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Bridget (talk) 11:21, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

@Bridget Thanks for the message. Let me share my opinion at the AfD. Charlie (talk) 23:52, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Cannot participate. I don't have the rights. Charlie (talk) 11:32, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello CharlieMehta,

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 74, March–April 2026

• New partnership: Swissdox
• User survey results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 10:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User:CharlieMehta and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Memorial Centre for Culture when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:42, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Vkwiki100. I'm writing to let you know that I plan to make substantial changes to this article. At present, it lacks a clear structure and is missing important information related to the subject. As you are the article's creator and a major contributor to it, I thought it would be courteous to inform you in advance to help avoid any misunderstandings or potential edit-warring. If you're interested, you can look at my previous Wikipedia contributions to get an idea of my editing style. I would also recommend taking a look at the article 2024 NEET controversy, which I substantially expanded and reorganized. Thank you. VK wiki100 05:34, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

@Vkwiki100 I appreciate the courtesy, although there was no need to notify me. But, of course thank you for being nice. Just try to keep it neutral, well-sourced, and free from sensationalism. And, try not to use AI-generated text. Charlie (talk) 07:03, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

@Vkwiki100 I checked the new text with GPTZero, and it scored 66% AI. That's why I have restored the last stable, non-AI version for now. Please feel free to re-edit or expand the section using your own words. I appreciate your effort and good faith contributions to the page. Charlie (talk) 14:26, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

I am not saying the whole page should be 0% AI... at GPTZero. However, 66% is just too high. Charlie (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Actually I write it in my words but as english is not my first language it contains some grammatical errors and some words which might not be formal or encyclopaedic. I use Gemini to correct grammar. I think that paraphrasing by Gemini is resulting in this GPTZero score. Can you suggest me some solution to this. VK wiki100 14:47, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

If you do not have expertise in the language, I advise you not to edit the page, though the choice is yours. If you still want to go ahead, please run any text you want to add through GPTZero and edit it there until it passes the AI check. As a free user, you receive 10,000 credits per month, which is more than enough for this editing work. Charlie (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

I think copy editing is not problematic using AI per WP:LLM. So, I think I can continue doing that, as I have used AI for copy editing in my previous edits too and even got an article to GA status. But since it is showing as AI-generated on GPTZero, I believe I need to paraphrase it so that it does not get flagged as AI-generated. Also, whatever I am adding satisfies WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NOR. VK wiki100 16:17, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

No matter what, do not get blocked for using AI. Charlie (talk) 03:03, 8 June 2026 (UTC)