User talk:Constrayevan

Hello, Constrayevan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ϢereSpielChequers 11:50, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Epiphany (Kashdami album), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:51, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

I forgot to put everything in. Constrayevan (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2xrakai, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twitch was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Oh ok, sorry Constrayevan (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to 2xrakai. Thank you. Wracking ^talk! 22:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at 2xrakai. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not add the subject's real name without a reliable source. Wracking ^talk! 04:51, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

A page you created has been deleted because it was a biography of a living person that was entirely negative in tone and unsourced, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Do not create unreferenced (or insufficiently referenced) content about living people, especially where you are including highly contentious and potentially defamatory information. You have been warned about this already, therefore please consider this your final warning.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay fine I’m sorry Constrayevan (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

FYI - I have a strong belief that this user is connected to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Colassww/Archive, and I blocked them on the Simple English Wikipedia as such. However, I haven't been able to gather a good case here on the English Wikipedia that would convince a checkuser to check. Basically the same focus on Soundcloud-type rappers, the same poor grammar (much more obvious in their deleted Simple articles on their other accounts than here), etc. Just sharing this info in case it triggers anything for you or another admin reviewing things here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:13, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

How am I the same person to Colassww, whatever that name is, is me, I only edited on English Wikipedia. Okay maybe I type SoundCloud rappers, but I don’t focus on SoundCloud-type rappers all the time. Constrayevan (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Reparations (song), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi Constrayevan. Thank you for your work on World Damination. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NMUSIC. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pink Dreads is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Dreads until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:54, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to World Damination. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:52, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to ColanXP. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and reliable sources to properly support the content. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:43, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I have moved this article back into the draft namespace.

Firstly, do not move pages by copypasting the content into a new location, and then blanking the source location. This loses the edit history, which must be retained. On this occasion that wasn't too much of a problem, since the history consisted of your own edits, but I'd wager you didn't know that and rather just got lucky.

Secondly, with such poor referencing, this article was absolutely not ready to be published. Not only was there no evidence that the subject is notable, most of the information was unreferenced, and the few sources there were are so weak that they cannot be used to verify the contents. In fact, if you genuinely believed that this was ready to be published, that shows that your grasp of our notability and verifiability requirements isn't yet good enough for you to publish articles, or move them from the draft space into the main space, and should continue to put your drafts through AfC review.

If there is anything in what I've said that is unclear, please ask. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Clock it. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Bleood (2). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and reliable sources to properly support the information. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

The page had six relatable sources and the page that I created was connected to the Wikidata. Constrayevan (talk) 18:57, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I don't know what "relatable sources" means, but the sources cited in this article (now draft) are Last.fm which is deprecated and mustn't be cited; three blog entries; and two others, of which one makes only a passing mention and the other not even that. None of these contributes anything towards notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:27, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ss3bby. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and reliable sources to properly support the contents. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:32, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Posed2be. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay, I've now had to move quite a few of your new articles into the draft space (and I still have many more to check, which I don't have time for right now), enough for me to say you should not publish in (or move to) the main article space until you have demonstrated a much better understanding of our notability and verifiability requirements. Will you agree voluntarily to abide by such a restriction, so that I don't have to block you from the article name space? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

So you move every article that I created was moved to an draftspace. Constrayevan (talk) 03:35, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

I haven't moved every one, but quite a few, yes.

You didn't answer my question. Will you agree to this restriction, or should I block you instead? Up to you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:14, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Fine, I will agree to this restriction. Constrayevan (talk) 09:33, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Constrayevan, you were asked to not publish in main article space, and yet you just created BandannaSaint, Public (song), and Hypernova (mixtape) in the mainspace. Do you not agree to the voluntary restriction described by DoubleGrazing? Wracking ^talk! 05:12, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kashdami - World Damination.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lil Tecca, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Diff: Special:Diff/1359242497. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 02:19, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Ok but Lil Tecca is literally a record producer singer and songwriter. Constrayevan (talk) 03:05, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Ok but literally WP:V. For example, nowhere in the article or the immediately following source following is Lil Tecca described as a record producer or singer.

Also, "songwriter" is already covered by rapper right? Unless the implication is that Lil Tecca does writing for other artists, in which case that isn't supported either. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 02:19, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to BandannaSaint. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and reliable sources to properly support the contents. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:25, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for not complying with notability and verifiability requirements.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then post an appeal to the administrators' noticeboard.  DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:29, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Since you're clearly either unable or unwilling to comply with our rules, I have blocked you from editing in the main article space. You may still create new content, but only in the draft space, and you must put your creations through AfC review. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:33, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Constrayevan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Your blocking me just because im the one who is unwilling your guys rule. This is stupid, every article I create you just keep moving it into the draftspace, like I’m putting every sources on every article I create, but noooo, I have someone who is trying to block me because I’m just putting reliable sources. Like what do you mean that article that I create is not ready, I’m creating an article about rappers.

Decline reason:

Please read WP:N and WP:GNG and then come back here with a better appeal. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:29, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Constrayevan (talk) 08:55, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is user Constrayevan. Adakiko (talk) 19:25, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi! This essay might be helpful to you: Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. ^{In solidarity,} 🏳️‍🌈JohnLaurens333 ^{(They/them • Talk • Contribs)} 21:15, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turn Up is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turn Up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:13, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reparations (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reparations (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trust Issues (Kashdami song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trust Issues (Kashdami song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2026 (UTC)