User talk:Darrrrmilk

I promise I wont vandalize Darrrrmilk (talk) 18:10, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Battle for Dream Island, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 17:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok got it. Darrrrmilk (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Also, please don't remove messages on talk pages other than your own. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 17:14, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Those where unneeded @Not-cheesewhisk3rs Darrrrmilk (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

ok the warning was false those sources are indeed stupid and biased Darrrrmilk (talk) 17:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm not trying to argue for or against the content of the article. All I'm saying is don't remove messages by other users on talk pages. Especially the temporary account that gave you a complete answer which most registered users couldn't even add to. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 18:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

understood Darrrrmilk (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grow a Garden. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The comment about how one game won the "admin abuse war" (and the other "loose"d) is clear vandalism and not an encyclopedic edit. λ NegativeMP1 03:29, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

How is that even vandalism? Darrrrmilk (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Explain Darrrrmilk (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

"Meaning they loose the admin abuse war" is not encyclopedic terminology. It is not helpful information, it is not in wiki-voice, and it's misspelled. It is irrelevant to the simple fact that Steal a Brain overtook the game in a players record; the source to that fact doesn't mention the admin abuse war anyways. Rather, it appears as an off-hand, biased comment, if not outright vandalism. λ NegativeMP1 03:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

1)I can provide a source as well

2) You misspelled ¨Steal a Brainrot¨ as ¨Steal a Brain¨(huge misspell),so we can all make mistakes but instead of outright reverting it,see whether you can fix it.

3) it indeed does mention the Sammy-Jandel admin abuse war,check the specific section of the article. Darrrrmilk (talk) 03:41, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

The source that is attributed to Steal a Brainrot overtaking Grow a Garden in visits does not mention the admin abuse war. And even if it did, the statement is still not wiki voice or encyclopedic writing. Are there sources that outright declare that Steal a Brainrot "won" the admin abuse war? Is there anything that considers the admin abuse war more than just a silly shared event?

And yes my bad for misspelling the game title, I type too fast sometimes, but at least it wasn't in an article. λ NegativeMP1 03:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

...Do you have a source for this, either? λ NegativeMP1 03:48, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

I didnt add that part Darrrrmilk (talk) 04:02, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

You made the edit. λ NegativeMP1 04:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

But not the part where it says that ¨DoBig¨ games owns it. Darrrrmilk (talk) 04:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Is that the part I'm talking about? No, it's not. I'm referring to the material you added in that edit, about the studio seemingly being controversial in the Roblox community. You need reliable sources for that. But even if you found sources for that, WP:NPOV. λ NegativeMP1 04:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Steal a Brainrot, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. λ NegativeMP1 20:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Well,at least give it a mention,Steal a Character deserves to be mentioned. Darrrrmilk (talk) 20:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

If you can't find reliable sources that clearly state that the game was inspired by "Steal a Character", then no, it does not deserve to be mentioned. That's not the focus, anyways. The focus is that this is, once again, adding unsourced material to an article. Your current edits are not compatible with Wikipedia, especially if you repeat what you did last night and deny accountability for an edit clearly made on your account. λ NegativeMP1 21:01, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Once again, in this revision, adding unsourced material. The source you added does not mention "Steal a Character". There is no mention of the game at all. λ NegativeMP1 20:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mesocyclonic93. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mesocyclonic93^(t)_(c) 00:58, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

It was not test I was reporting someone Darrrrmilk (talk) 00:59, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

@Darrrrmilk: The template they should have used contains a link to WP:TPO. That may be useful if you want more information. – EX Aero (What have I done??) 01:46, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Darrrrmilk!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, SuperJames888 (Talk to me) 02:04, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 162 etc. (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

What did I even do? Darrrrmilk (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

162 etc. (talk) 22:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

I only reverted your edit 3 times while you reverted mine 4 times so you are the one who is making a big edit war here. Darrrrmilk (talk) 22:09, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

An article should remain at the version not affected by the content dispute. Please see WP:STABLE.

Repeatedly restoring contentious edits is edit warring. Enough. 162 etc. (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

I was adding to the article to make it more clear what you linked is for vandalism(which I was not doing). Darrrrmilk (talk) 22:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Darrrrmilk! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 22:33, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Italian brainrot. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Please keep your edit summaries civil and avoid making personal attacks towards other editors. Golem08 (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

How did I attack other editors? Darrrrmilk (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I never said bad things about Thegoof plz I promise Darrrrmilk (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your edit summaries were not WP:CIVIL and potentially fall under personal attacks. I'd suggest you avoid this in future. Golem08 (talk) 19:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I'll do more than suggest. Darrrrmilk, if I see you enaging with editors as you did in these two edit summaries, I will block your account. This is a collaborative project and if you can't remain civil, you can't edit here.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:50, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Because biased people vandalized that page. Darrrrmilk (talk) 19:57, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

That's absolutely no reason to write what you did in those edit summaries. I'll reiterate, "this is a collaborative project and if you can't remain civil, you can't edit here". -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:02, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Fine Im not going to edit here EVER AGAIN Darrrrmilk (talk) 20:03, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Jk Im back I will edit again because someone thanked me for my edits on Italian brainrot Darrrrmilk (talk) 22:24, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Finnfrog99 (talk) 15:47, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Second Congo War, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:00, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Please don't engage in disruptive editing make a point. It is possible to make a point, without disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate that point. Typically through discussion. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Since when? Darrrrmilk (talk) 16:30, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for disruptive editing that indicates you may not be capable of productively contributing to English Wikipedia at this time. Please edit other Wikimedia projects for a time to build experience, and appeal this block in six months or so.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:51, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Why do you have to block me just because I retired. Darrrrmilk (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

@The Bushranger why did you block me? just because I retired doesn't mean you have to block me Darrrrmilk (talk) 01:23, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

You are blocked because your behavior, should you return (which you clearly have), is significant enough that allowing you to continue to edit in articlespace at this time is likely to result in damage to the encyclopedia. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:40, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

@The Bushranger If Darrrrmilk wanted to, could he theoretically submit (good) edit requests here before appealing in six months? Blue Sonnet (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

That would be a good way to build confidence in their editing abilities, certainly. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:59, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Great! @Darrrrmilk, you can submit edit requests (click here for instructions) where you suggest an improvement to an article and a more experienced editor checks that it's ok and makes the edit for you, but first it would be a really good idea to brush up on your editing skills.

Accepted edit requests will help future appeals, declined edit requests will hinder them - so make sure you make them good!

It's really important that you don't waste the time of whoever is considering your edit request too, since they're also a volunteer doing this in their own personal time. Don't waste their time with an edit request unless you're sure it's a good quality one.

Here are some suggestions on where to start improving your future editing career - it won't be easy, but it'll be worth it if you genuinely try hard to get better:

• Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure
• Help:Introduction to Wikipedia
• Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help:Directory

Blue Sonnet (talk) 23:13, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

https://italianbrainrot.wikioasis.org/wiki/User:Darrrrmilk Is this your account on that weird Italian Brainrot wiki? Based off your patterns here and on sites like those, I'd assume, but I just want confirmation. greyzstuff, professional idiot 16:24, 4 May 2026 (UTC)