User talk:Mesocyclonic93

My name is Isa, and this year I'm the project manager for the Partners subsystem at Hyperloop UPV.

The team has noticed that the team's Wikipedia page is quite outdated, and we wanted to try to update it, but you deleted all the information due to vandalism.

We simply want to correct the information and create a proper page, as there's currently a lot of incorrect data.

I would be very grateful if you could allow me to update the page. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-14158-16 (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

I would like to know exactly what changes I made amounted to "no consensus." There was never a discussion that covered any of these pages. If you would like to go through the changes I made and explain your opposition, I would be content. This defies the entire point of WP:BOLD. Wasting time is still my passion (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

In any case, it was @RGloucester that reverted my changes in the first place without providing a reason for them. I have already left a message on their talk page. In any case, their reversion (and your reversion) is WP:MASSR. Wasting time is still my passion (talk) 15:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello Wasting time is still my passion, please don't refer to essay sections as if they were policies or guidelines. WP:BOLD is, but WP:EW is too. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Mesocyclonic93, if you had rollbacked because the user was blocked, please note that it wasn't a case of block evasion (so rollback wasn't appropriate), and that your rollbacking effectively participated in an edit war while misusing the rollback tool. Unless you can point to a specific block that has been evaded with an edit, you may not rollback it as block evasion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

i have the evidence that the pye green tower is visible from space. this all happened 17 years ago in 2009 when my uncle, Greg Tranter went to space with the pitmen and soon its his 50th birthday please let it slide for today so i can show him Thetowerfrom space3458 (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Angela Criss. They should be SRG reported too =) – LuniZunie_(talk) 00:25, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

My edit was not test I was trying to report someone. Darrrrmilk (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Well can you explain this edit? Maybe I gave you the wrong type of warning, but please know that you shouldn't edit other people's comments. Mesocyclonic93^(t)_(c) 01:07, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I just thought it sounded better that's why I edited it but I didn't change it to make them say something much different. Darrrrmilk (talk) 01:09, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I thought you were talking about this where if you see the newer 3 edits it got blocked by abuse filter. Darrrrmilk (talk) 01:11, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Refactoring other's comments is not allowed. Mesocyclonic gave you the wrong warning, yeah, but please don't change comments from other people in the future. – EX Aero (What have I done??) 01:40, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Got it. I promise to not do that again. Darrrrmilk (talk) 01:41, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I had no clue this user was an LTA lol.

(Thank you for reporting him before me :) ) Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 15:08, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

- SimpleObjects-9ei ❄️/☃️/🥶 00:06, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Let's wait for the block before reverting from now on. – LuniZunie_(talk) 18:22, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

@Phlogiston Enthusiast @User:pipe058 Pinging you guys here too. PE, please don't talk to them through edit summaries since it will only feed them. – LuniZunie_(talk) 18:27, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Right, sorry. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:28, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Repeating this but for a new TA, please also read Wikipedia:Don't edit-war with vandals or sockpuppets ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 23:34, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Yep, I sent you an email (meso). – LuniZunie_(talk) 23:35, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Honestly I forgot that unblock requests show up on an admin review category like CSD templates. Mesocyclonic93^(t)_(c) 23:36, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

All good! @SimpleObjects-9ei keep this (unblock requests show up on an admin review category) in mind too please!
i.e. it attracts admins to help deal with it =) – LuniZunie_(talk) 23:37, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh, thanks Luni for my work on this talk page! Thought you were inactive since I saw nearly no activity in late March. - SimpleObjects-9ei 🌸/🌻/🌞 23:40, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm still here! I won't be leaving any time in the near future =) I'm committing to college soon so things are a bit hectic in my personal life right now =p – LuniZunie_(talk) 23:42, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

• April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates
• May 8–12: Discussion phase
• May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

• The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
• Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
• The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
• The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
• Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

The discussion phase of the May 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• May 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
• May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
• Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

All Ive changed was the diff to update on the discussion Honeypack (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

In general, you are not supposed to edit other people's comments, and the purpose of the link you changed is to link to the first attempt to communicate, not the most recent attempt. Mesocyclonic93 ^(t)_(c) 16:09, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Got you, thanks Honeypack (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I've received this feedback from you: I'm Mesocyclonic93. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to BNB Smart Chain (blockchain platform) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Could you please let me know why the links have been removed? And what kind of links would be appropriate instead?

Also, was this the only issue? I'd like to update the page as it's not painting the full picture.

Looking forward to hearing from you Wikichain1 (talk) 21:28, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello Mesocyclonic93. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Artikel erstellen, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 18:59, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
• Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)