User talk:Dora Lilly

Hi Dora Lilly! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kwesi Yema (talk) 08:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Kwesi Yema, Thank You. Dora Lilly (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Nicola Paparusso. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 14:29, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I think his bio passes WP:GNG as there are secondary sources at google scholar. Dora Lilly (talk) 15:32, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I also think it passes WP:ANYBIO, which I believe it's my word against others, with the OMRI honor, didn't find anywhere it stated it could be purchased as an editor pointed out on the debate. I have viewed numerous debates and contributed to a few, GNG is interpreted in various ways, and I still find that difficult to understand, as a lot of publications shared on some AfD, passes GNG for the publication name and not the content it carries. I find that really alarming. Dora Lilly (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello Dora Lilly. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dora Lilly. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dora Lilly|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 14:30, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@Dora Lilly: Considering that 4+ editors have created this article with fairly similar sourcing and contents, it is obvious you're being paid for this. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 14:30, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Looking at the debate, the Pulse source was set to be published without a byline, with a look at the article it has a byline "Pulse Staff", which didn't playout on the debate. Here, I used few found sources, which WP:Basic applies with on the following TheSource, Pulse Ghana, and Rolling Stone UK, with its primary source, passing WP:GNG. For the draft looking like any of the four previously deleted, here's a hint used on the article, AI generated. No COI, it's understandable after the other version created by the editors. Dora Lilly (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Majority of the GNG passes on AfD are interviews > , but they are approved for how notable the medium maybe. Dora Lilly (talk) 16:31, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello @ChildrenWillListen, I just established a new theory on the topic, extracted from his book Caffè corretto. Dora Lilly (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Wura season 4. Afí-afeti (talk) 07:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Glad to help. Dora Lilly (talk) 18:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Abrar Mustafa Khan. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 07:42, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Okay,Thanks Dora Lilly (talk) 08:29, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Tega Oghenejobo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

in solidarity, Chloe (talk) 22:25, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank You Dora Lilly (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I just reviewed your article. Nice work! As a side note, I think that it will greatly benefit from a few more independent sources as it currently relies heavily on TechCabal. Have a good one :) ScottyNolan (talk) 18:23, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

@ScottyNolan Thank you so much! I really appreciate you taking the time to review it and for the feedback. I’ll definitely look into adding a few more independent sources to strengthen the article. Have a great one too! 😊 Dora Lilly (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of a page by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into London (music producer). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", splitting the page history and violating our attribution requirements. Wikipedia software has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title along with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account has 10 edits and after 4 days have passed since the time of your first edit, you can move an article using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both keeps the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect to the new title. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way, please request assistance from a page mover. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 13:28, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the information you shared. Can you also delete this page: Thisizlondon so a move can be done with the help of your guide. Dora Lilly (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Please read and follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:18, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Thisizlondon production discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TitCrisse (t•c) 00:21, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to List of awards and nominations received by Thisizlondon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and the sources on the page do not demonstrate that the topic of Thisizlondon awards overall is notable, merely that he has won individual awards. I also feel this would be better at the main Thisizlondon article.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 16:59, 26 September 2026 (UTC)