User talk:Garzfoth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

More information Getting Started, Getting Help ...
Hello, Garzfoth! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 07:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
Close
Thanks for the welcome! I'll go through all that and see if I overlooked anything previously. Garzfoth (talk) 23:53, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Just a friendly suggestion; I think that lots of WP users find red usernames annoying to look at. If you make any kind of edit to your user page, even a more or less empty one, that awful hue will change to awesome blue. Centrify (f / k / a Factchecker_has_annoying_username) (talk) (contribs) 01:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Done, thanks! Garzfoth (talk) 01:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language
The Cure Award
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your current BRFA

I left a comment at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/InfoboxBot that you may find helpful. Enterprisey (talk!) 13:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Garzfoth (talk) 03:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. — xaosflux Talk 16:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Unless you will carefully monitor it, I suggest you redirect User talk:InfoboxBot to here. — xaosflux Talk 18:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! I've redirected the bot's user talk page to this one, updated its user page a bit, and have rewritten large portions of my scraping and parsing scripts to make good use of the additional capabilities made available by the bot flag (scraping and parsing operations are now dramatically faster to run and they also have a vastly-reduced impact on Wikipedia's servers as well). I think I'll likely start putting the bot to work on some of the most pressing issues within the next few days to a week. Garzfoth (talk) 06:37, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

A small error

I recently come across your css file(User:Garzfoth/common.js) from the category Pages using invalid self-closed HTML tags. I don't know what that specific error which needs to be corrected so that page can be removed from that category. Currently, I am posting this message to point out a small error which I have come across when I visited that page. In that, in line 1473 ie. date = new Date(year, month, day, hours, minutes); please confirm whether the variable 'day' will be accessible from there. Because if you need to use that variable, I think you need to define that variable out of the if condition block. Adithyak1997 (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 11


Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 13

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 14

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 15

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 17

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 18

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 19

"AFCR" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect AFCR. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 23#AFCR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 20

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 21

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 22

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Illumina leftover edit request

Hi Garzfoth, thanks so very much for your help on items 1, 2, and 4 of my talkpage edit request at Talk:Illumina,_Inc.#Corrections_to_text_requested. You didn't happen to comment on or implement item 3 (adding the fact that the new CEO was already the president), so I'm wondering if that was just an oversight and whether you could look at it. It's a quick fix, and I made it quicker here . If you can help, many thanks and you can close out the edit-request thread. TM.at.illumina (talk) 05:07, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Help with Temu Article

Hi, I see that you’re an active member of the Internet WikiProject and I was wondering if you might be willing to have a look at a proposal (I have a COI as a Temu employee and am trying to adhere strictly to the rules, which is why I’ve made a proposal instead of editing the page myself.) As you might know, Temu’s app has been the most downloaded iPhone app in the United States over the last few months , so I hope that you might find the subject matter intriguing given your interest in Internet subjects. Thanks very much for your time! Snowy2000 (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 23

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 24

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 25

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 26

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 27

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Clonidine rewrite feedback

Hi Garzfoth,

You recently gave me praise on talk:methylphenidate for fixing the lead. I'm currently dedicating my time to a rewrite of the clonidine article in order to get it up to a similar standard. However, this task has made me relatively uncertain about the quality of the content given the template provided by the current reviison.

Although I've been on wikipedia for nearly two years, the only major article content rewrite that I've taken part in is for amphetamine (i.e., adding coverage on binge eating disorder, narcolepsy, sex-dependent differences in pharmacodyanmics, a large rewrite of the pharmacodynamics section after a massive content discussion at wikiproject pharmacology, among other additions. Unlike clonidine, it was fairly straightforward for me to integrate new content into that article given that fantastic template Seppi produced in getting it up to featured article standard.

Given that, I would like to get an opinion from somebody who has written content on ADHD pharmacotherapies for wikipedia before. Seppi is one of only a few wiki users I've previously talked to directly, but they're largely off-wiki so I'm likely not going to ask for their opinion on my Clonidine rewrite. So, I figured I'd ask you. Even if you're not familiar with clonidine specifically, I'd appreciate getting your opinion on the flow and language I've used to write the medical uses section draft before I move on to drafting the adverse effects and pharmacodynamics sections in my sandbox.

It's drafted in this sandbox

Thanks, Professional Crastination (talk) 03:04, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

@Professional Crastination: I looked at your draft. It looks very good to me. The content, flow, languages, and references are a good fit with the preferred standards for medical articles.
The only thing in it that might be worth adjusting is that it seems to omit the mention that the IR form is not FDA approved for use in treating ADHD (ie that only the XR form is approved for that indication in the US). I think preserving that is worthwhile, since that is notable information that does not appear to be mentioned elsewhere in the article.
Outside of that minor quibble, I think it's ready to be merged into the main article. If you are planning on following the same general format and style for rewriting the rest of the article, then I'd encourage you to go ahead with rewriting it, as this is exactly the format, tone, and style that's preferred.
Hope my feedback helps! Garzfoth (talk) 23:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback - I appreciate getting your 2¢ on the content.
I am definitely going to add a statement about extended-release approval in the United States. Not only does that compliment the what the sources stay alongside what is cited in the content already written Re: "...the addition of clonidine extended-release produced greater reductions in ADHD symptom scores than continuing stimulant monotherapy" and the statements about IR clonidine for sleep, which is an example of why IR isn't FDA approved because it's an example of an adverse effect of core ADHD symptoms turning into a therapeutic effect for a technically different medical use (i.e., insomnia).
I will eventually merge the content once I write a pharmacodynamics section. The current revision of the article (NB: Clonidine#Mechanism_of_action) has a mechanism of action section with subsections of various health conditions, but rendering the content through that condition-MOA lens has been made largely redundant by the way I've written the medical use subsections (i.e., those subsections provide a brief description of the understood MOA). I also don't like that it is done that way. I much prefer the standard PD subsection delivery a la amphetamine, where it states broad pharmacodynamic actions that are expected - based on the current evidence - to happen with sufficient exposure regardless of who takes the drug. The current MOA might give an impression to the general readership that those biomolecular drug effects only happen in the population with that diagnosis, which obviously isn't true. Case in point: although I take dextroamphetamine for ADHD and don't meet the criteria for a narcolepsy or excessive daytime sleepiness diagnosis, on the days I am acutely sleep deprived I still benefit from its direct pharmacodynamic effects in the ascending reticular activating system that inhibit the onset of sleep and lead to improved performance on tasks that would otherwise suffer from being in a low state of arousal. Plus, the clonidine MOA subsections essentially restate "activates alpha-2 receptors in brain or brainstem, inhibits norepinephrine, [miscellaneous info] causes therapeutic effect."
Thanks again, Professional Crastination (talk) 02:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Requesting Clarification

Hey mate, regarding the edit on Tier 2 you did. I modified the old source because for me at least it returns HTTP 522.

See url: https://imgur.com/a/Ak0gPaG

Is it only a issue on my end?

Thanks! Lungu Ștefan-Gabriel (talk) 16:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Wikimedia Hackathon Northwestern Europe 2026

Hello! I noticed you're a bot operator, so I thought you might be interested in a hackathon we're organizing: the Wikimedia Hackathon Northwestern Europe 2026, on 13–14 March in Arnhem, Netherlands.

It's a two-day, technically oriented hackathon bringing together Wikimedians from the region. Whether you want to work on bot frameworks, tools, or other technical projects, this could be a great opportunity to collaborate with fellow developers. Registration closes mid-January or when full. Let me know if there are any questions. Hope to see you there! Daanvr (talk) 08:58, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI