User talk:Georg84

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Georg84, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 23:56, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Suresh Kumar Pandey

Information icon Hello, Georg84. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Suresh Kumar Pandey, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jay8g [VTE] 23:43, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. Georg84 (talk) 14:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
I do not have any personal or professional connection with Dr. Suresh Kumar Pandey.
My edits are based only on publicly available and verifiable sources.
I understand Wikipedia’s COI and neutrality policies and will continue to follow them carefully. Georg84 (talk) 14:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Georg84, where did you find his birth date? There's no source for it in the article. And how were you able to take a posed photo of Dr. Pandey, if you have no connection with him? The photo was uploaded as your own work. Wikishovel (talk) 11:31, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
The birth date is currently unsourced and will be updated once a reliable source is available, and the image was provided by the subject, and permission for its use under CC BY 4.0 is currently pending. Georg84 (talk) 11:54, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
The image was provided by Dr. Pandey? What is your connection with him then?
And if birth date is currently unsourced, then how do you know it? Wikishovel (talk) 11:55, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
I do not personally know Suresh Kumar Pandey. The image was provided to me by the client for upload, and permission to use it under CC BY 4.0 is currently pending. The birth date in the article is currently unsourced and will be updated or removed once a reliable independent source is available. Georg84 (talk) 12:03, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Who is the client who provided you the image for upload? And did the client tell you Pandey's unsourced birth date? If you're working for an intermediary who's commissioned you to write the article, then you must disclose this: see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Wikishovel (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
I am contributing to this article as a paid editor for a client, in accordance with Wikipedia's paid-contribution disclosure policy. I do not have any personal connection with Dr. Suresh Pandey. The image was provided by the client, and permission is currently pending. Georg84 (talk) 12:22, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
I am contributing to this article indirectly on behalf of the client. I mistakenly declared it as “own work,” but permission is currently in process. Georg84 (talk) 12:24, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Understood. As a paid editor, you must immediately make a formal disclosure of this, as explained at Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. You must do this before you make any more edits to the article. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 12:28, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Indeed, you must do this before you make any more edits whatsoever. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 17:53, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Okay. Georg84 (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
I am pedantic over this; that edit was one which you should have made the PAID declaration formally before leaving here. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 22:42, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Suresh Kumar Pandey moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Suresh Kumar Pandey. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 12:59, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

icon You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. I’ve now added the paid editing disclosure to my user page. Thank you for letting me know. Georg84 (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. Please read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, where it clearly notes that you must disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You have still not done that yet, and I don't understand why you haven't. Wikishovel (talk) 17:11, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
And now you've changed "employer= Indirectly via client" to "employer=Georg84". What does that mean? The client who's paying you is a company called Georg84? Or you're the client? All of this looks highly evasive, and I can't understand why you have a problem naming the client that's paying you. Wikishovel (talk) 18:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
I apologize for the confusion earlier. I was unclear about how to correctly disclose my paid contributions. I have now updated my user page to reflect that I am contributing indirectly via a client on behalf of Dr. Suresh Pandey. Georg84 (talk) 18:48, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
You've changed the template back to "employer= Indirectly via client". Which client? Why do you keep refusing to answer this simple question? Wikishovel (talk) 19:02, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Just to clarify, I was hired by Shahrukh Bukhari to contribute to this article on behalf of Dr. Suresh Pandey. I am a bit confused about the template update should I list Shahrukh Bukhari or Dr. Suresh Pandey as the employer/client? Place clarify this and it will be easier for me. Georg84 (talk) 00:19, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
If Shahrukh Bukhari is paying you to write, then in a "paid" template at User:Georg84, you would list the employer as Shahrukh Bukhari, and the client as Suresh Pandey:
{{paid|employer=Shahrukh Bukhari|client=Suresh Pandey}}
Wikishovel (talk) 06:51, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your guidance and patience. I have now updated my user page with the correct paid contribution disclosure. Georg84 (talk) 13:12, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suresh Kumar Pandey (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaCore were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AlphaCore talk 20:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Georg84! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AlphaCore talk 20:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Iiii I I I. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gehad El-Haddad without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Iiii I I I (talk) 09:58, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your message regarding my earlier edit. I temporarily removed some content because certain statements appeared factually incorrect and could negatively affect the person. My intention was in good faith, and I want to ensure the article remains accurate and neutral according to Wikipedia’s Biographies of Living Persons policy. I would greatly appreciate any guidance on what steps I should take next in this situation. Georg84 (talk) 14:03, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Velmie (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ktkvtsh were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Velmie (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 16:20, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Velmie (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MediaKyle was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MediaKyle (talk) 02:32, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Weamn per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saroj32045. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 19:23, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI