User talk:Historynerd361

Hello, I saw your contributions and would want to invite you to a draft I am working on, Draft:Aramean people. If you would be willing to help, I'd appreciate it. Wlaak (talk) 17:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes of course. I can gladly offer help. Historynerd361 (talk) 19:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey! I have noticed your contributions to what is considered within the scope of Wikiproject:Aram (Suryoye) and would like to invite you to it. You could add your name very easily to the list of members here.

And thank you for the huge contributions you have given to the Aramean people draft. Wlaak (talk) 12:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Historynerd361, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Leaving you this warning as a result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wlaak. Please see WP:CANVASS, and keep in mind that your editing is in a topic that is now designated as contentious: WP:GS/ACAS. Thank you. -- asilvering (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harpoot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syriac. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Surayeproject3 (talk) 11:17, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Please see WP:GS/KURD, articles about Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed require extended confirmed as well. Your account is not currently extended confirmed, so you should edit in other topic areas until you reach that threshold. Thank you. Surayeproject3 (talk) 11:18, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks for the info.

King regards Historynerd361 (talk) 18:26, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mugsalot (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

How/where have I disrupted progress toward improving an article? Historynerd361 (talk) 14:15, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

@Historynerd361 Your edits from earlier today at Neo-Aramaic languages constitute another violation of the ECP policy of WP:GS/KURD, as you have added the term "Kurdistan" to the article body . Moreover, the changed text is directly word for word from the cited source which would've been a WP:CV if it weren't for my manual revert just now. This is just a second warning regarding the sanctions. Surayeproject3 (talk) 20:39, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

I understand there is a concern about my edit and its compliance with the WP:GS/KURD sanctions. I have reviewed these sanctions, which apply to "all edits about, and all pages relating to, Kurds or Kurdistan." I believe my edit was on-topic because the Neo-Aramaic languages article is a linguistic topic, concerning a distinct language family. While speakers are geographically present in Kurdistan, as mentioned in the source, the article's subject is not Kurds or Kurdistan itself. A linguistic article about a related but distinct ethnic and linguistic group does not fall under this umbrella.

My edit was intended to correct a citation issue. The version you reverted to contains several claims that are not supported by the provided sources. see 1 2 3

- Claim 1: ''Neo-Aramaic speakers is significantly smaller, and newer generations of Assyrians generally are not acquiring the full language..’’ The source doesn't use that ethnic terminology.

- Claim 2: "those of Assyria and Babylonia retaining an Akkadian grammatical influence.”

- Claim 3: "evolving in the Neo-Assyrian kingdom of Osroene, which came to be known as Classical Syriac.”

The cited source does not appear to contain these statements. My edit was an attempt to align the text with what the source actually says. I acknowledge that in my edit, I may have made an error in [e.g., not using direct quotation marks where needed], and I am happy to correct that. Historynerd361 (talk) 21:35, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

@Historynerd361, for clarity, the article's topic does not need to be "Kurds and Kurdistan". Until you are extended-confirmed, you cannot make any edits that are in any way related to Kurds and/or Kurdistan. Your edit was unambiguously a violation of GS/KURD. Please consider this a final warning. -- asilvering (talk) 04:27, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Understood. Thank you for the final clarification. I will not make any further edits related to Kurds or Kurdistan until I am extended-confirmed. Historynerd361 (talk) 14:18, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Please do not game extended-confirmed by repeatedly adding spaces to a draft. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:52, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. This is your 4th warning of such a kind by different editors. Hogshine (talk) 06:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Surayeproject3 𖢗 05:39, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Assyrian, Chaldean, Aramean, and Syriac identity, culture, and politics. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Better late than never I guess. Historynerd361 (talk) 23:09, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to edit pages per the discussion at the AE noticeboard.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Callanecc (talk) 05:06, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Historynerd361. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Murat Kurşun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:09, 10 January 2026 (UTC)