User talk:Igordebraga

Hi, Igordebraga! I want to join the commentary and take over the reports on Royal Rumble (2025), is there any request to join or just adding my name to the commentary? ROY is WAR Talk! 02:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Just write and add your name to the byline above. Any input is welcome. igordebraga ≠ 02:25, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7LhngzE10I&t=11s Polygnotus (talk) 04:49, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Is the description for the Deaths in 2025 always a quote from a person who's also on the top 25? I've noticed that the most recent few have followed that pattern. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Not always. Given the death list is on every week with few exceptions, straight entries get repetitive, so I started putting song lyrics about death (or ones taken out of context to seem like it). The others caught on, though at times putting quotes instead of lyrics. And if the list has something to reference in the death list entry, it's all the easier to write! igordebraga ≠ 16:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

But in any case, @Wildfireupdateman:, there's no problem with straighter entries like the one you did, I only changed because I had already set a song lyric and lost it during the edit conflict. After all, every contribution to the Report is welcome. igordebraga ≠ 16:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips! I'm planning on contributing more to the report; it seems interesting. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 20 June 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! Wehwalt (talk) 11:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you today for the 2007 article Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Quick facts

story · music · places

Close

... and today for the timely appearance of Jaws (film), introduced (in 2012): "Like Martin Brody, my ship was sunken by an adversary willing to chew on me, and I'm taking shots at it. Lame jokes aside, I had already rewritten this Former Featured Article hoping to return its bronze star, and then during the last FAC User:DocKino joined and did a much-welcome copyedit. Now that my two weeks of waiting are done, I just want to see if I'm gonna need a bigger boat,"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

It looks like we added the same content one minute apart from one another. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:38, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

@Bri True. Only when I returned to edit something I noticed the duplicate. Now if only the bot that updates the most edited list resumed working so I'd add that as well... igordebraga ≠ 05:19, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Didn't know if you watch the Signpost newsroom, but there's a couple of hours left until publication if you want to try to squeeze in Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/September 21 to 27, 2025. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:16, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

The quote you pulled for Patricia Routledge at Traffic report draft was not familiar to me; it really hit home when I read it. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:28, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Game of Thrones season 1 is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Game of Thrones season 1 has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

If you ever decide to send this article to FAC, let me know. It is very well done. The only reason it was delisted from FL was because a decision had been made somewhere that those season articles no longer qualified as FLs; there was nothing wrong with the article. I believe the improvements we made were valuable. I would happily support this if you choose to pursue FA. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Rock Band (video game) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

I am going to lumber you with this one as the above draft has no talk page. Can I suggest, in accordance with MOS:NUMBERSIGN, that the prefixed # throughout is replaced by either number or No. (or even no.). Without the bolding, of course. Thanks. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:36, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

@Derek R Bullamore I moved to the Wikipedia namespace that would be the article's eventual destination, should be enough. igordebraga ≠ 23:17, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello Igordebraga, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Wishes from Vestrian24Bio

Click here to see the Christmas message I wrote...💞! Vestrian24Bio 13:05, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here, and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Houston Rockets has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Igordebraga. Apologies for contacting you out of the blue but I was wondering whether you be willing to take a look at my featured article nomination for Bella Ramsey's page? I noticed you’ve recently reviewed Chris Pratt's FAC, and I’d really value any feedback or suggestions you had. Thanks! Crp74 (talk) 10:34, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for providing a plot draft for Scream 7! However I do note that you missed a few characters' names. See here:

Talk:Scream 7#Name mentions

Thanks! NarutoSan6000 (talk) 04:34, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

		The Signpost Barnstar
		For helping to write an interesting and useful Traffic report (vol. 22 issue 4 and always).

☆ Bri (talk) 05:03, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:05, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• MCE89 (submissions) with 1,333 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,169 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to shipping ethics controversy in fanfiction, waterways, and Gu Yanwu
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,149 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, and featured lists about figure skating, along with many article reviews and two good topics
• Olliefant (submissions) with 830 points, mainly from good and featured articles about television shows, episodes and media, along with nearly four dozen good and featured article reviews
• Gommeh (submissions) with 827 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to Genshin Impact and Honkai: Star Rail

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)