User talk:Juniorcast18

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to French people, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I did not cite properly, i will cite porperly now. Thank you. Juniorcast18 (talk) 03:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Germans, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contrary to your promise given above, you added information that is not given in the source you provided. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Espejo del Perú no es una fuente fiable, puesto que el sitio web es un blog. Acto seguido, la supuesta monografía que hace de referencia para varias de las ascendencias mencionadas en dicha página, dígase: [Abuhadba Rodrigues, Daniel (2007); Monografía: «Origen de los Apellidos en el Perú», Cusco, Perú, Fondo Editorial de la UNSAAC – Publicación disponible en la Biblioteca Universitaria de la UNSAAC (2007)], no existe en la mencionada biblioteca: véase. El autor tampoco existe fuera del sitio Espejo del Perú, cuando se le busca en buscadores como Google, Google Scholar, etc. no existe, cuando lo lógico es que haya más huellas de su aporte, considerando la importancia de sus supuestas contribuciones. Por ende, hace un buen tiempo que Espejo del Perú no es una fuente fiable para Wikipedia en español, y por ende, para toda Wikipedia, incluyendo su versión en inglés. Saludos. Wikiedro (talk) 20:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Cities with highest Italian ancestry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. SecretSpectre (talk) 08:35, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of countries by displaced population hosted, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on List of cities with the largest Italian-descended populations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. SecretSpectre (talk) 23:22, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SecretSpectre. An edit that you recently made to List of cities with the largest Italian-descended populations seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This is the second time you've created the same article using AI. SecretSpectre (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I respectfully disagree with the characterization that the edit was simply “AI-generated text” unsuitable for Wikipedia. The statistics and references used in the article were based on publicly available sources, census estimates, migration reports, and demographic research. I did not intentionally fabricate citations or information.

I do use AI as a language-assistance tool because English is not my native language, but the underlying information itself was researched manually. Many editors use grammar and drafting tools, especially non-native speakers.

If there are specific issues related to WP:SYNTH, WP:NLIST, sourcing quality, or formatting, I am willing to improve the article accordingly. However, dismissing the contribution primarily because it appears AI-assisted does not address the actual reliability of the cited information.

I would appreciate more concrete feedback regarding which statements or sections are considered unsupported or improperly synthesized so they can be corrected in accordance with Wikipedia policy.

Thank you. Juniorcast18 (talk) 04:56, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to List of large migrant legalization and refugee regularization programs. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and WP:SYNTH and WP:NLIST problems.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~ A412 ^talk! 02:48, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, these sources are valid, if you do a simple search online you will see these figures. And I use AI to help me write these articles because English is my 4th language. Juniorcast18 (talk) 04:54, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for the feedback and for moving the article to draftspace instead of deleting it outright.

I understand the concerns regarding machine-generated text and synthesis. I want to clarify that I used AI mainly as a language assistance tool because English is not my first language, not to invent information or sources. I tried to base the article on publicly available data and reliable references.

I will work on improving the draft by rewriting sections more carefully in my own words, reducing synthesis, and making sure each statement is directly supported by reliable sources in line with Wikipedia policies such as WP:V, WP:NLIST, and WP:SYNTH.

If possible, I would also appreciate any specific feedback on which sections are most problematic so I can improve them properly.

Thank you for your time and guidance. Juniorcast18 (talk) 04:56, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cities by estimated undocumented immigrant population is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities by estimated undocumented immigrant population until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Boynamedsue (talk) 11:03, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Juniorcast18,

Thank you for creating List of cities by estimated undocumented immigrant population.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

the synthesis of different types of data probably makes breach of WP:OR inevitable here.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boynamedsue}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boynamedsue (talk) 11:04, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Juniorcast18,

Thank you for creating List of cities by estimated undocumented immigrant population.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It is factually incorrect to use figures for the UK as a whole to give a figure for London, this is really basic stuff.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boynamedsue}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boynamedsue (talk) 05:03, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of countries by estimated irregular migrant population is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by estimated irregular migrant population until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

~ A412 ^talk! 14:50, 7 July 2026 (UTC)