User talk:JustSomeGuy4361

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Robert Moses, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review WP:IPCV as well. DonIago (talk) 05:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

I also did a similar thing in Flushing Meadows–Corona Park. Should I remove my edit there as well? JustSomeGuy4361 (talk) 17:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

If you don't have a secondary source to establish the significance of the 'in popular culture'-style information, then yes. DonIago (talk) 01:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello. The page Nonpartisan is a disambiguation page, not an article. Your edit here incorrectly restored links to the disambiguation page. Please correct this error.

Substantively, I disagree with your edit comment as well. It is possible that some candidates in a nonpartisan election are also nonpartisan politicians, unaffiliated with any political party; but it is also possible that other candidates in the same election are active members of, and actively supported by, a particular party even though the party label does not appear on the ballot. Characterizing every candidate in such an election as individually "nonpartisan" is misleading. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

the reason i reverted your edit was because the link you changed was under the party key. i found it strange to have the party name of a candidate simply be "nonpartisan election". while the election was nonpartisan, it would be strange to say someone's political party was "nonpartisan election." instead i offer an alternative. i looked for more information about the city's elections, and although the election itself was nonpartisan, yes, all the candidates were affiliated with the democratic party yet running in a nonpartisan election. should i instead set the party value to "democratic", with a footnote that they were running in a nonpartisan election instead? that would remove the disambiguation link and be more accurate. let me know your thoughts. JustSomeGuy4361 (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

I've fixed the election box template so that "Nonpartisan election" is now abbreviated as simply "Nonpartisan," which might resolve your concern (try previewing the old version of the page with my edit and see how it looks). Alternatively, you could try the footnote approach, although I'm not sure whether the template would play nicely with that. (Not your problem, but I find the election boxes and some other templates annoying because we have to format the content to fit the template author's preferences, rather than what we think will best serve the reader.) --R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

sounds good, ill restore your edits JustSomeGuy4361 (talk) 20:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Since you seem to possible know him do you think it's possible he have any photos that could improve the article? Trade (talk) 16:37, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

i really doubt it, if this is the person i think it is they do not live near rhode island. but regardless i think they need time to process this event and that should be prioritized over the quality of the article. JustSomeGuy4361 (talk) 16:41, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cleveland County, North Carolina, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of townships in North Carolina, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

asilvering (talk) 20:52, 2 March 2026 (UTC)