User talk:KaijuEditor

Hi KaijuEditor! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:30, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 03:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Wait… when? – KaijuEditor (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

The CTOP does not cover just the article Arab–Israeli conflict, it covers all things about it. So for example the article 2010 Gaza flotilla raid falls under this as it is related to the conflict, even though it is not the article itself. Sophisticatedevening^(talk) 16:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

I just sent this to give you more information per our discussion on Talk:Iran–Israel relations. Basically, WP:ARBPIA requires extended-confirmed status to even discuss the topic. Making an edit request is ok as long as it's uncontroversial, but discussing the subject matter to attempt to gain consensus for your edit is, unfortunately, not allowed. — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 19:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

So until I gain the status, my edit request is a no go? – KaijuEditor (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Pretty much. It’s been declined, so just leave it. Once you hit extended confirmed you may discuss the edits on the talk page — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 00:42, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

The page Zmei (Russian has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Rusalkii (talk) 19:09, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Excessive citations has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 22 § Excessive citations until a consensus is reached. --Wotheina (talk) 06:58, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for since you have (procedurally atleast) evaded the block on your old account by creating this account.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sohom (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Note that this would technically be a clean start, except that you have publicly linked both accounts, which invalidates a clean start (+ the fact that you were under sanctions disqualifies you from doing a clean start). I think the best possible situation here to explain your previous actions, why you did them, what you learnt and ask for a unblock. Based on looking at your old account you were close to getting the standard offer and if you can convince a reviewing admin, you can probably continue editing under this account since (based on a cursory look) the edits you have made don't appear to be net negative in general. Sohom (talk) 01:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Notes for reviewing admin, User:God's_Godzilla is the old account for context. Sohom (talk) 01:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

KaijuEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

In lieu of previous actions.

1. I was in a mood to make Wikipedia, back then, an interconnected place, by linking related articles or videos (of which some are still up too this day: Aftermath (2010 TV series)), without realizing the dumb implications, which I took as personal attack, which in hindsight is dumb.

2. I had a notion of thinking, I was making Wikipedia more interconnected to itself, which I made useless edit links. I was and am wrong. As my edit debacle in Native American genocide notes. (I dropped my edit war, when we reached a favorable compromise)

3. I’ve learned to leave / back off from overzealous liking & to be careful with what I link, and decided to switch to formatting, and allow other more experienced editors, do the actual proper writing.

Accept reason:

Unblocked by The Anome CoconutOctopus talk 09:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

• Procedurally, I think it makes most sense to bring this to WP:AN for review by the community, as the block was initially imposed by consensus at ANI. I will do so now. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  The discussion can be found here. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  See my post below. Doug Weller talk 08:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

See discussion here. Welcome to Wikipedia! — The Anome (talk) 07:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

And immediately initiated an edit war https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Daily_Wire&diff=prev&oldid=1316357141 against consensus FMSky (talk) 00:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Just saying. – KaijuEditor (talk) 01:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

See Perhaps I am missing something, but the sources I checked do not mention the Daily Wire. Doug Weller talk 08:13, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Someone has claimed same thing. I don’t have access to journals, so I just default to policy on academic journals. – KaijuEditor (talk) 10:02, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

@The Anome there may be a problem. Doug Weller talk 09:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Please see Doug Weller's note above. I have temporarily blocked you for 31 hours to give you a breather and prevent further tendentious editing. If you want to make contentious edits, you must justify them on the talk page.

I suggest you might consider refaining from contentious editing completely, since you are coming out from an almost decade-long block. You are welcome to dicuss the block here if you wish. Please be aware that blocking you again for another 10 years is on the cards if you can't play nicely with others. — The Anome (talk) 01:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

I’m aware, it was reverting a bad faith removal. As clearly demonstrated in the thread. But, if the consensus, based on a technicality, is a ok, I’ll leave it alone. As for my block, I understand, and will leave it be. – KaijuEditor (talk) 02:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Please note that a sort name is very specifically a human name sorted by last-name first, e.g. Reagan, Ronald, or Chisholm, Shirley. Cheers! BD2412 T 19:28, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Template:Liberalism US has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:58, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Specifically, look more carefully at what is going on before calling and edit "vandalism". Something as simple as an error does not qualify as vandalism. In this case, there was an unintended artifact in the edit. That's fine to revert - or even better, fix. A very cursory look may seem to be vandalism, but you should first WP:AGF and look beyond the surface before throwing labels into your edit summaries. TIA. ButlerBlog (talk) 15:03, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, KaijuEditor

I edit here too, under the username Shocksingularity and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Palestine genocide, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 22 § Palestine genocide.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Shocksingularity}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Shocksingularity (talk) 01:56, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 15 § FAQ/Readers until a consensus is reached. consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 20:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Please don't change the redirect target to a sub section of the article. This is the old title of the article, the title under which it is indexed in Google, linked from many articles and other websites. Tens of thousands of readers are expecting the main article, not a sub section of it, from this link. --Bjerrebæk (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Far-left and right politics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9 § Far-left and right politics until a consensus is reached. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

The redirect WikiIndex has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 4 § WikiIndex until a consensus is reached. Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 00:04, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geologic time scale, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time scale was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 12 March 2026 (UTC)