User talk:KjwilliamsCASL

Hello, KjwilliamsCASL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:KjwilliamsCASL, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KjwilliamsCASL|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Bobby Cohn, So sorry, I may have missed that was required on my page. Thank you for the template, I just added this. Is there anything else required from my end? I do not want to violate any Wikipedia term of use. KjwilliamsCASL (talk) 16:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

No worries, I see that you did that (in a less formal way) in other areas of the project so I don't believe you were trying to obscure anything. Thank you for placing the template on your user page. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The citation has been fixed, but the sources are not sufficient to establish this is a notable company. Ref. 1 is fine, but the others are only good for verifying details: Ref. 3 is a paid promotional piece, and the others are routine announcements or reviews of the company's loan products, not the company. At least one more independent, significant piece of coverage like Ref. 1 is needed for an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:College Ave and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I hope you are doing well.

I’ve reviewed the previous feedback and made the requested updates to ensure full compliance with Wikipedia’s content and citation guidelines. I believe the article now meets the requirements but I’m happy to make any further refinements as needed. I appreciated your feedback.

Thank you. KjwilliamsCASL (talk) 19:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)