User talk:KyleDJF34

Hello, I'm Ram1055. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Orlando Anderson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ~RAM (talk) 08:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Graham 'Abo' Henry, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 04:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Steven Ogg. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 06:34, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lupertazzi family. Binksternet (talk) 02:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, KyleDJF34. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Graham 'Abo' Henry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Many Saints of Newark. BOVINEBOY2008 16:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

What

KyleDJF34 (talk) 18:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, KyleDJF34. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Graham 'Abo' Henry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tony Soprano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Associate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohamed Hussein Roble, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello! The Buffalo crime family needs this edits. You can google this if you want, I’m from buffalo little Italy. Everything I say is fact that can be checked on google.

Past associates: Monty Massimi- was murdered in North Buffalo.

Currently associated: Joseph Bella- recently arrested and connected with the pharaohs club(gerace)people

Currently associated: Ron serio- connection to Anthony gerace during raid and drug dealer connection to pharaohs

Currently associated : David Gambino - convicted drug kingpin with ties to Italy, through fillipo inglima

Currently associated: fillipo inglima: Italy drug dealer tan restaurants/bar in Buffalo/Niagara falls

Soldiers: John a pieri is dead

Soldiers: dilly spataro just got out, legendary hit man/drug dealer! 2603:7080:E437:4315:51EC:50F9:450D:5EA5 (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Whatever Monty got involved with the bottom line is they murdered him in cold blood by shooting him in the back 3 times and 1 time in the head as he was walking away. Those are the god damned facts and no lies or cover up will erase what has happened. The truth is out and its too bad who doesnt like it. Sorry Mr Grisanti maybe you are unaware of what goes on in your house but THAT IS THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH. David Gambino, Sammy Vacanti, Louie Vacanti, Adam Amoia, JR, Faust Novino and Fillipo Inglima are all known major drug dealers and conspred and carried out the execution of Monty Massimi 2603:7080:E437:4315:51EC:50F9:450D:5EA5 (talk) 21:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

What? KyleDJF34 (talk) 05:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Guy owes $25,000 and claims Genovese Captain, Tough Tony told him not to pay

According to John Pennisi he told a story on his YouTube channel. Tough Tony is still a Genovese Captain. He could be semi-retired but still holds the rank of capo. --Vic49 (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Okay KyleDJF34 (talk) 03:20, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

But that was a few year's ago i would say since he is 81 he is probably not in the best health and would be more focused on his family KyleDJF34 (talk) 03:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Capos don't really retire they usually stay in power until they are replaced by the admin, imprisoned or die. I don't think Tough Tony would step down to lose his rank. He has a strong crew (Corona Avenue Queens), his guys are very low key no major indictments, no reason to step down. He most likely is using his acting capo for more and staying the back ground. For Tough Tony to give up his capo rank would be losing a lot of power. That is the Genovese family (Westside) style of leadership hiding in the background. Westside usually uses front guys to hide the real bosses. His longtime acting capo Anthony Romanello is also in his 80s. --Vic49 (talk) 17:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Yeah your probably right KyleDJF34 (talk) 23:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

If you want too you can revert my edit. KyleDJF34 (talk) 23:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Don't worry i reverted it, thank you for bringing this to my attention. KyleDJF34 (talk) 23:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joey Diaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Longest Yard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello. The Scottish first minister's resignation as leader of the SNP won't take effect, until her successor is chosen. GoodDay (talk) 04:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grant McBride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Egan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Truth or Consequences, New Mexico, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Landslide victory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce McDonald.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Precedent from other election articles is to leave outgoing leaders up until they're replaced. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

George Souris

added links pointing to Ian Armstrong, Michael Costa and John Hannaford

Michael Costa (politician)

added a link pointing to John Watkins

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Souris, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ian Armstrong, Michael Costa and John Hannaford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:22, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:23, 4 September 2025 (UTC)