User talk:LeannJordan

Thank you McGeddon,

Yes, I did repost it back up only after I received other Wikipedia editors in sandbox, who suggested how best I should post it.

Yes, because I only comment in Wikipedia on what I fell I have knowledge of. I am an aspiring inventor myself.

I noticed that you have over the years a special interest in editing 3M Post-it notes Wikipedia page posts. Can you please disclose here how and if you are in any personal and or business contact or relationship with 3M, Post-it notes or any one affiliated with or for them?

I didn't know of and or about Amron before 2011 when I read of Amron inventions in published reliable reports, and so I reached out to connect with Amron on LinkedIn.

I read in 2012, when I first cited on Wikipedia about Amron inventions, the questions and discussions that the Wikipedia community had on Amron and the Post-it note "claims". Now in 2014, 2 years later, I found these new published facts on Amron Post-it notes claims, so I cited them. Certainly I waited long enough to cite these additional published important facts to Wikipedia.

I feel as an aspiring inventor myself, after reading about Amron the inventor and all his accomplishments, and then reading the outrageous claims of how 3M invented the Post-it notes, it was something that the additional publicly known and published facts be noted (cited) about.

There is no denying that Amron had a factual published and known public records roll in the Post-it notes history, and as Wikipedia is a source for that important encyclopedia published known public facts and information, what better place for it to be documented.

I would appreciate it if you would correctly edit my Amron Post-it notes simple paragraph, that you have so quickly each time deleted without corrections (with all the research effort that I put into it) back up on the Amron Wikipedia page ASAP.

Thank you,

LeannJordan

There's no way for me to "correctly edit" your paragraph because Wikipedia require reliable sources for all content, and your suggested content has none - as explained (to you?) two years ago at Talk:Post-it_note#Amron, court documents and press releases are not reliable sources.

I'm happy to reassure you that I have absolutely no personal or professional connection to the 3M corporation or to Post-It Notes as a product. --McGeddon (talk) 17:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

McGeddon thank you for that, but your Not entirely correct, they are not all from the same MarketWire press release, (see the updated citing post below) and most press publications and news organizations use only creditable press releases and gathered information, and companies such as Yahoo Finance and Reuters News Wire publish only those that they believe to be reliable sources. See other more recent 2014 blog and publications that I listed that talk about Amron inventions and include discussions on the his Post-it note. I would appreciate either you correct what I posted, or post it as I wrote it in the same speed in which you so quickly deleted it each time. Amron has in fact invented the Press-On Memo pads and the facts and public information on it is readily available on line. ----

• Press-on Memos were invented by Amron in 1973. ^{[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]} repositioning, reusable sticky memo note pads, see the original artwork ^[10] and the original mailings sent ^[11] to 3M in 1974, and 3M executives were given several samples by hand that same year. Litigation was quickly settled ^[12] when Amron received a check from 3M just weeks after his filing the attached infringement action and complaint in New York Federal Court. ^[13] As per the attached Court Dockets. ^[14] Press-on Memos was what Amron called his invention in 1973 – 3M called it Post-it Notes in late 1974. ^[15] ----

Please stop doing this! Edits like this one are incredibly confusing, because to anyone reading it looks like I was responding to a two-year-old thread, when I clearly wasn't. Just post a new comment saying what you want to say, in your own words. --McGeddon (talk) 18:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

After months have gone by, and I see that there is no editorial support for the multiple posted actual historical facts in this Amron Post-it notes history issue, from any other credible Wikipedia editors, I LeannJordan can no longer believe in the credibility and or the honesty of any of the provided history and or facts in and of the entire Wikipedia system.

Which is supposed to be an historical record of all the facts and issues. One lone Wikipedia editor has successfully prevented important historical facts in the Amron Post-it notes history to be posted. Happy Holidays! December 18, 2014 LeannJordan LeannJordan (talk) 23:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)