User talk:MRSC

Hallo, Thanks for adding the infobox to Beryl (company), but you added an ambiguous link to Bath. Here's my boiler-plate message ...

There is an easy way to avoid linking to disambiguation pages: if you go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and look under "Appearance" you'll see "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange" towards the bottom of the section. Select that tickbox, and whenever you Preview a page you'll be able to see whether you've accidentally linked to a disambiguation page. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 12:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello MRSC!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Combined authorities indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

So I noticed you made the GeoJSON page for Airfield ward. My question is how did you get the data for the 1978 boundaries? TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 12:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Some of them have been published by the ONS / UK Data service but watch out for older ones marked "synthetically generated" as they are far too imprecise. There are maps of the 1965 boundaries here. MRSC (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Mayor and cabinet executives has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackheath (Lewisham ward), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juliet Campbell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Brighton and Hove City Council.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Are you aware of the almost-blanking of the template you originally created and filled many years ago?

See... EDIT:974255512.

Was there any discussion before this was done? I am not aware of any.

This template was very useful as it originally listed every UK prefix, by type, in a very compact format, with links out for specific types and examples.

-- 92.18.74.255 (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Thurrock Council coat of arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:People from South Lakeland District indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

I have started a move discussion about moving the name to Victoria Park, Finchley, and I am notifying you as I see that you did the reverese move back in 2010. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milton (Southend-on-Sea ward), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton (Southend-on-Sea ward) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Westborough (ward), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westborough (ward) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Romford has been listed for good article reassessment. The discussion is located at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Romford/1. Hog Farm _Talk 03:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Town (Colchester ward), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Town (Colchester ward) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Category:Craven District has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Northernhenge (talk) 12:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

In what possible way does it not exist? Danners430 (talk) 14:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

It does not exist yet. It has not yet been constituted. The legislation creating it has not been introduced to parliament. MRSC (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devons Road DLR station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devons Road DLR station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 09:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. Thanks for the changes you are currently making to this article. I am sure it will be much improved when you have finished. At present, you have made 42 amendments in about 16 hours. This means a huge list of changes in the page's history, and a lot of work for others who are watching the page. Could you possibly consider drafting up all your planned changes using your sandbox, and then doing a single update? Thanks. Masato.harada (talk) 11:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

No. MRSC (talk) 11:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) This is a genuine problem - making lots of small edits in a short space of time causes problems with watchlists and makes it difficult to read histories. Please consider either making one large edit or using your sandbox. Danners430 (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

No. MRSC (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Are you going to contribute contructively to a genuine concern that an editor has raised or are you going to just be dismissive and rude? Danners430 (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elm Park tube station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 02:43, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

The article Elm Park tube station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elm Park tube station for comments about the article, and Talk:Elm Park tube station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, MRSC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coat of arms of Greater London, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Template:Crossrail 2 navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 24 § People by region subcategories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 07:14, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. I noticed we both have some GANs that have sat there for a while and that we both seem to intend on having lots more GANs. Would you like to return a favour and we can review each others. We could do one-for-one or just keep reviewing each others' nominations as and when we can; whatever works for you. Don't worry at all if you don't want to. Thanks, JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 20:46, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Upney tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 16:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Upney tube station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 18:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Upney tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 16:41, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi - I see you have been working on a number of LT&SR stations recently. I am currently working on Benfleet and then working towards Shoeburyness mostly to expand the history sections and add operations (Goods/Signals/Timetables and Industrial sidings). I know you have changed a few thing so I will try and pick them up when I rework any articles but if you do see something I have deleted please let me know. Thanks also for the improved nationalisation text - I did have the (original) text on Fenchurch Street but its been deleted so be careful. Best. Davidvaughanwells (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for the message. I'm planning on working mostly on the stations in Greater London, including the ones that are now District line and London Overground stations. So we should have them all covered between us. No doubt there will still be some crossover. MRSC (talk) 19:39, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Great - I'll continue east and then see if I can add anything to the ones you're doing. My main source is the Peter Kay set on the LT&SR with some Middleton Press as well. Thanks Davidvaughanwells (talk) 14:56, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Upminster station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:45, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Upminster station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:42, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Upminster station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JuniperChill -- JuniperChill (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JuniperChill -- JuniperChill (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JuniperChill -- JuniperChill (talk) 21:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi, in this edit you use {{sfn|Kay|1997|pp=128-130}} but there's no source "Kay 1997". I'm sure you meant one of the three Kay sources, 1996, 2010, 2020, but I don't know which. Could you fix it? DuncanHill (talk) 21:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Defunct/disused/former railway stations on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

County Borough of Leeds has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I just wanted to say well done on the GLA arms article. I can it was waiting in your sandbox in anticipation of the transfer, and since publishing the page you've developed it even further. It's come together very well. A.D.Hope (talk) 11:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

It is a good page. Thank you. Think it might be a good article candidate. MRSC (talk) 11:35, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

If you decide to put it forward I'll be happy to help, if I can be of any use! A.D.Hope (talk) 11:38, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

On 8 December 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Queen's Theatre in East London was named to reflect its opening in the same year as the coronation of Elizabeth II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:LFCDA logo 1989.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Template:Greater Manchester Police has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elshad (talk) 21:28, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Damian White 2019.png, which you've attributed to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aH_bQCJo4Mo. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 15:56, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Darren Wise Havering portrait.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:John Tyler Havering portrait.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 16:16, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Keith Darvill Havering portrait.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 16:22, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Ray Morgon 2023.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. – robertsky (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Former wards of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Former wards of the London Borough of Hounslow indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

On the Wikipedia RDT where Dairy House railway station is shown, there are station icons on both running lines that run parallel at that point and I wonder if this is correct or if there is a missing railway station nameon the left hand line,where a gap appears? I have made contact with you, as you were the last contributor to edit that Wikipedia RDT.

Heald Green (talk) 04:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)