User talk:ModlordD

hi! thank you for choosing to review my good article Minecraft Manhunt. it's my first, and i'm not all too familiar with the process works. i understand there may be some preliminary concerns about the writing quality, and i just wanted to mention that most of the article was in the process of a rewrite (tightening phrasing & adding sources), at which point i would consider it complete. i just wasn't expecting it to be reviewed so fast! is this okay with you if i finish up this edit prior to a full review? thank you! 9koyami (talk) 17:43, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Congratulations on nominating your first article for the good article status, I understand it might seem a little scary. I understand that you are in the midst of editing your article, so I will place this article on Hold status for around one week - two weeks. I have done most of my review already, and so I will put that on the review page (you have done pretty well!). Keep in mind however, this just means that the article will not be passed or failed until that time. ModlordD (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

thank you! i probably should've done it in advance (i assumed it would take about a week for a review to begin) and i was in the process of proofreading with another editor, but fell asleep. i'll be sure to apply changes from your comments as well: final editing shouldn't take any longer than a day, though you're free to return at any point! i'll make a comment on the talk page once everything you've said has been addressed and i've done all my fixes. 9koyami (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

nice to see you super enthusiastic! my review has been completed, you may see it at Minecraft Manhunt/GA1. I have kept in on hold as we discussed. ModlordD (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD: article's ready for the GA review!

9koyami (talk) 12:13, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

My second review has been posted. You can find it at Minecraft Manhunt/GA1. Last time I put the review on the article page; this was a mistake. The new one is on the talk page. Your page will remain on hold for reasons stated in the review. Great changes since last read, with all things considered. ModlordD (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD: the mentioned fixes have been made!

9koyami (talk) 03:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Congratulations of having a good article! This is an amazing feat, and I'm aware on how well this means to you. The badge on the article will be automatically added by a bot at some point. The final review I had made in on the Minecraft Manhunt talk page. ModlordD (talk) 04:00, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

thank you so much for your review and patience throughout! it's very satisfying having a video series i watched religiously during COVID get its own article of this quality! 9koyami (talk) 04:03, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

thanks so much! happy wikipeding, I suppose ModlordD (talk) 04:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! I appreciate the enthusiasm with trying to nominate some Marvel characters for GA status, but I am messaging you to let you know that I don't think they're going to be ready for the process yet. Much of their articles contain uncited statements, which falls afoul of the Wikipedia:Good article criteria's Verifiability quota. While weaker, criterion three, Broad in its coverage, I also feel isn't addressed here. There is a lot of significant analysis and discussion of these characters not being incorporated into the article from what I can see in a quick search (I'm seeing a lot of promising hits in Scholar for example). Finally, and though this is more picky-choosey, I'm not quite confident it's meeting the "Well-written" criteria; the prose doesn't seem to very concise, as many sections, particularly the plot summary, seem to run for quite some time and don't seem particularly brief.

I'd suggest basing yourself off of some other Marvel character articles, such as Iron Man and Captain America, which are both Featured Articles, and, while stricter, should give a good idea formatting-wise and content-wise of how these kinds of pages should be set up for such big characters. At present I'm not confident the articles you nominated will be able to pass a review. That's not to say they can't, and I definitely believe you can get them there; they just need some more work before they're ready. I'd personally suggest working on a draft in your userspace or starting on some smaller characters to get yourself more familiar with the area, though if you feel confident trying to mimic that style and implement it into such big articles, I certainly can't stop you, and I wish you the best of luck.

I do hope this helps, since it's always good to see more people interested in the character space. Let me know if I can clarify anything further. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 07:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

yoo! honestly thank you, its so refreshing that a real person is trying to tell me these things. I'm generally a shyer person so I rarely try to go out of my way to find a "mentor" as the wikipedia articles try to recommend. just for that alone I thank you.

as for the other stuff, I really only nominated those articles because I had been doing very heavy copywriting and reformatting poorly written areas, but I didn't add much new information. I can see now that was probably not the smartest idea, or at the very least a very good idea, so I will actually go out of my way to look up some new information.

as well, whilst I do believe that much discussion does exist in scholarly forums about these characters, just from what I hear it seems very likely that these analysis' are rather on their live-action counterparts. Since in the MCU most of these counterparts get their own Wikipedia pages, those links unfortunately apply more towards them, at least as far as I know. ModlordD (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD: For MCU counterparts; it does tend to depend on the article, but if the bulk of coverage is about the MCU or a film adaptation, then a merge may be wise (Since there's not really a reason for separation if the dev/receptions aren't vast enough to warrant a merge). I did something similar with Peacemaker (character) recently when I nommed it for Good Article since the bulk of his reception is in relation to the DCEU adaptation, though I imagine with the two you nominated there may be enough for a split since they have far more noteworthy comics histories than Peacemaker (Though I am mostly just guestimating here).

Let me know if I can help with source searching and the like! I can definitely try finding stuff in places, for example like the Wikipedia Library (Which I am unsure if you have access to, if need be I can search in there for you). I'd also suggest, if you need further help, reaching out to Thebiguglyalien or Wrangler1981, who both have been doing some heavy work in the Marvel characters area, especially on some big names. They may be able to point you to resources for the area I may be unaware of. Let me know if I can clarify anything else! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey, I did a lot of work on Quicksilver's publication history. Can you see if that looks good. I'll do some more of the article soon but I just wanted to make sure I'm on the right track ModlordD (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Random, but just wanted to ask: You've put Moon Knight on the backburner for now, right? I'd suggest removing your GAN template from the talk page while you work on him. Since he hasn't had work akin to Quicksilver or Punisher done yet, a review now likely would have complications.

Also, saw your current slate of articles you plan to work on; best of luck for some of these. These are titanic articles; I have mad respect for your willingness to work on them. Best of luck! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:10, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Yeah, those articles are definitely going to take quite some time, but I'm excited to make some articles GA. Kinda happy I found my own niche within the Wikipedia space.

As for the Moon Knight article, that was an oversight. Meant to remove it a while ago but I forgot, thanks for letting me know. ModlordD (talk) 23:17, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

It's definitely a good niche to fulfill! For as mainstream as these characters are, there's very little actual improvement for comics characters, especially for big names. The work you're doing is highly appreciated. I wish you the best and if there's any way I can help at all do let me know. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:43, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

thanks so much! actually I do need assistance for one thing. Recently, I tried to make a separate article titled "Kingpin in other media" similar to "Daredevil in other media" because I felt the Kingpin in other media section was getting too lengthy. But I kept trying to publish the article and I kept getting this archive error about the type of archiving service. I tried to rectify it but as far as I looked none of the websites were archived with it.

Could you look at the Kingpin in other media section and let me know if I missed something ModlordD (talk) 02:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD What was the archival issue? I only know of Archive Today being a problem, though I don't see it in the current section. On a side note, though, you should probably remove Looper, which is considered an unreliable source.

Outside of that, I will say I'm not sure a split is really necessary here. "In other media" articles and similar splits tend to get merged a lot for failing notability (See cases like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Panther in other media, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Joker, etc). These articles typically need reliable sources verifying that the topic of "_ in other media" actually meets independent notability. It's possible of course (Batman in film, Alternative versions of Spider-Man) but typically only for characters where there is a lot on them. I'm not sure Kingpin is one of those characters. Additionally, the current section is not super long and likely easily condensable; I'd check out other similar GA Marvel articles and see how they do it. Some alternate versions of the Kingpin are worthy of discussion and mention, but keep in mind not every appearance needs to have its own separate listing. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:34, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Okay thanks for letting me know. After I looked at it again I agree with you, I won't split it ModlordD (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah I do apologize for being a downer; I only bring it up largely because of notability concerns rather than anything else. Regardless, best of luck with the Kingpin article.

Would you still need me to clarify the archival issue? If so, I'd need to know what archival error you're having when you try to perform edits. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:29, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Nah don't worry about being a "downer". You ain't, and I'm definitely not passionate at all about making a "Kingpin in other media" article lol.

As of the issue, I believe the error I got was that I was using an Archive Today link. With that being said, I'm pretty sure the article doesn't use it, so I'm pretty lost there. ModlordD (talk) 21:46, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD I think I found it. The ref verifying his appearance in The Punisher game apparently uses Archive Today for its archival. You can check using source editor. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:44, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

thx! ModlordD (talk) 21:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi ModlordD. Thank you for your work on List of Moon Knight supporting characters. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 06:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi ModlordD. Thank you for your work on List of Moon Knight enemies. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Your good article nomination of the article Quicksilver (Marvel Comics) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DAP389 -- DAP389 (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Quicksilver (Marvel Comics) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DAP389 -- DAP389 (talk) 03:34, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	As a congrats note for your insight to issues from the article "We Are Charlie Kirk" before passing as GA. - RTSthestardust (talk) 00:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

thank you! congrats on the GA ModlordD (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Quicksilver (Marvel Comics) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DAP389 -- DAP389 (talk) 03:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Punisher skull symbol at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soulbust (talk) 03:41, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I have opened an AN discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Concerns over the handling of an RM pinging dispute that may be of interest to you. Wh1pla5h99 (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

On 11 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Punisher skull, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Punisher skull has been adopted as an unofficial emblem by real-world police departments and far-right activists? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Punisher skull symbol. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Punisher skull), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:02, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 25,440 views (1,060.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

lets go!! ModlordD (talk) 22:47, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On 12 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Quicksilver (Marvel Comics), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a rights dispute meant that two different actors played Quicksilver in two competing film franchises at the same time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Quicksilver (Marvel Comics). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Quicksilver (Marvel Comics)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

I don't want to swell your already massive to-do list at User:ModlordD/GAMarvel, but if you are ever looking for additional characters that could be worth looking at when that well runs dry (or ones that you didn't think of before but really want to tackle), I came up with a list of my own, ones that I felt were more iconic than the average character. :) Major film roles were not required, but certainly didn't hurt!

Avengers (comics) and members (and associates):

• Black Knight (Dane Whitman)
• Bucky Barnes
• Carol Danvers
• Doctor Strange
• Falcon (comics)
• Hank Pym
• Hercules (Marvel Comics)
• Namor
• Scarlet Witch
• Shang-Chi
• She-Hulk
• Spider-Woman (Jessica Drew)
• Vision (Marvel Comics)
• Wasp (character)
• Wonder Man

Fantastic Four:

• Human Torch
• Invisible Woman
• Mister Fantastic
• Thing (Marvel Comics)

X-Men and members (and associates):

• Beast (Marvel Comics)
• Brian Braddock
• Cable (character)
• Colossus (character)
• Kitty Pryde
• Rogue (Marvel Comics)
• Storm (Marvel Comics)
• Warren Worthington III

Antagonists:

• Apocalypse (character)
• Doctor Octopus
• Eddie Brock
• Galactus
• Hydra (comics)
• Juggernaut (character)
• Loki (Marvel Comics)
• Mystique (character)
• Phoenix Force
• Red Skull
• Sabretooth (character)
• Thanos
• Ultron

BOZ (talk) 23:34, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks so much for this list! I'm always looking for new interesting things to write, thanks for putting some more options on my radar ModlordD (talk) 00:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

No problem, I hope a few of them are appealing to you. :) BOZ (talk) 03:28, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

This should get some or all of your current requests answered, but it might keep you busy! BOZ (talk) 23:07, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

ty for letting me know! ModlordD (talk) 00:40, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Sorry that your GANs got denied, but you might want to collaborate with User:Wrangler1981 on Punisher at least - between the two of you I'm sure you can get that one across the finish line. :) BOZ (talk) 22:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Yes, it could certainly be done; especially if I have help. I probably have most of the necessary resources. I just haven't dedicated the time to it, because the GA requirements can be time-consuming. Wrangler1981 (talk) 23:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Also Kingpin - I have more sources for that too. Wrangler1981 (talk) 23:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

cool nice! i'd be totally down to collaborate on those. Kingpin is probably more closer to GA atm so we should probably do that one first ModlordD (talk) 00:45, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

ok. Let me know if there is anything in particular. Wrangler1981 (talk) 00:51, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

just saw your edits on the Kingpin article. Thanks so much you added a lot of information to the article! do you think it is ready definitely for GA or does it still need more ModlordD (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

In my experience, articles don't make it past the GA review if they have primary source references. Basically they all need to be replaced with secondary sources. Some of this still needs to be done for Kingpin. Some editors also might not consider some of the secondary sources to be reliable; Wiki editors tend to be skeptical of fan sites. I can try to make some other improvements over time. Wrangler1981 (talk) 20:07, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for letting me know ModlordD (talk) 20:27, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Squabble Up is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThrettanJuni -- ThrettanJuni (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Squabble Up has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThrettanJuni -- ThrettanJuni (talk) 02:07, 10 June 2026 (UTC)