User talk:ModlordD

Hello, ModlordD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Poovannathil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Brand New Dance (Eminem song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

YESUHHHHH tysm 🙏🙏🙏 ModlordD (talk) 22:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brand New Dance (Eminem song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Resto. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ModlordD! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! User:Significa liberdade (talk) 17:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! ModlordD (talk) 19:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coonan Cross Oath, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese, Syrian Christian and Latin rites.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Could you change the Hip Hop template to look more like this?

2600:6C5A:417F:528F:692B:4946:7A90:A055 (talk) 23:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, ModlordD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dirty Nachos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1907 Bellingham race riot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beatings.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for testing out the Add A Fact browser extension! This extension was developed as an experiment by the Future Audiences team at the Wikimedia Foundation to learn about new ways of contributing to Wikipedia from outside of our website/apps.

We are planning to wrap up this experiment this December, sunsetting the extension and publishing our findings on-wiki. We’d like to invite you to take part in an exit survey to tell us more about your experience of trying out the extension, and to share any ideas you have about how to support new ways of contributing to Wikipedia. The survey is anonymous (see the survey privacy statement) and should take about 10–15 minutes to complete.

You can take the Goole Forms survey here.

Kind regards, MPinchuk (WMF)

17:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, ModlordD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Forrest Starling, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

@ModlordD I see you have significantly improved Coonan Cross Oath. The next step is to find sources that support the history. Can you assist me in that? Warriorglance (talk) 03:25, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

sure thing! unforunately, I'm not sure on how easy of a task that is ModlordD (talk) 15:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, ModlordD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Forrest Starling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YoungLA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YoungLA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Junbeesh (talk) 08:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page YoungLA, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Template:Google series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Three (rappers) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Three (rappers) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– MW_(t•c) 17:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, ModlordD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:Alphabet Inc sidebar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Template:Alphabet Inc sidebar, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:31, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Quicksilver (Marvel Comics), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

hi! thank you for choosing to review my good article Minecraft Manhunt. it's my first, and i'm not all too familiar with the process works. i understand there may be some preliminary concerns about the writing quality, and i just wanted to mention that most of the article was in the process of a rewrite (tightening phrasing & adding sources), at which point i would consider it complete. i just wasn't expecting it to be reviewed so fast! is this okay with you if i finish up this edit prior to a full review? thank you! 9koyami (talk) 17:43, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Congratulations on nominating your first article for the good article status, I understand it might seem a little scary. I understand that you are in the midst of editing your article, so I will place this article on Hold status for around one week - two weeks. I have done most of my review already, and so I will put that on the review page (you have done pretty well!). Keep in mind however, this just means that the article will not be passed or failed until that time. ModlordD (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

thank you! i probably should've done it in advance (i assumed it would take about a week for a review to begin) and i was in the process of proofreading with another editor, but fell asleep. i'll be sure to apply changes from your comments as well: final editing shouldn't take any longer than a day, though you're free to return at any point! i'll make a comment on the talk page once everything you've said has been addressed and i've done all my fixes. 9koyami (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

nice to see you super enthusiastic! my review has been completed, you may see it at Minecraft Manhunt/GA1. I have kept in on hold as we discussed. ModlordD (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD: article's ready for the GA review!

9koyami (talk) 12:13, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

My second review has been posted. You can find it at Minecraft Manhunt/GA1. Last time I put the review on the article page; this was a mistake. The new one is on the talk page. Your page will remain on hold for reasons stated in the review. Great changes since last read, with all things considered. ModlordD (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD: the mentioned fixes have been made!

9koyami (talk) 03:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Congratulations of having a good article! This is an amazing feat, and I'm aware on how well this means to you. The badge on the article will be automatically added by a bot at some point. The final review I had made in on the Minecraft Manhunt talk page. ModlordD (talk) 04:00, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

thank you so much for your review and patience throughout! it's very satisfying having a video series i watched religiously during COVID get its own article of this quality! 9koyami (talk) 04:03, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

thanks so much! happy wikipeding, I suppose ModlordD (talk) 04:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! I appreciate the enthusiasm with trying to nominate some Marvel characters for GA status, but I am messaging you to let you know that I don't think they're going to be ready for the process yet. Much of their articles contain uncited statements, which falls afoul of the Wikipedia:Good article criteria's Verifiability quota. While weaker, criterion three, Broad in its coverage, I also feel isn't addressed here. There is a lot of significant analysis and discussion of these characters not being incorporated into the article from what I can see in a quick search (I'm seeing a lot of promising hits in Scholar for example). Finally, and though this is more picky-choosey, I'm not quite confident it's meeting the "Well-written" criteria; the prose doesn't seem to very concise, as many sections, particularly the plot summary, seem to run for quite some time and don't seem particularly brief.

I'd suggest basing yourself off of some other Marvel character articles, such as Iron Man and Captain America, which are both Featured Articles, and, while stricter, should give a good idea formatting-wise and content-wise of how these kinds of pages should be set up for such big characters. At present I'm not confident the articles you nominated will be able to pass a review. That's not to say they can't, and I definitely believe you can get them there; they just need some more work before they're ready. I'd personally suggest working on a draft in your userspace or starting on some smaller characters to get yourself more familiar with the area, though if you feel confident trying to mimic that style and implement it into such big articles, I certainly can't stop you, and I wish you the best of luck.

I do hope this helps, since it's always good to see more people interested in the character space. Let me know if I can clarify anything further. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 07:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

yoo! honestly thank you, its so refreshing that a real person is trying to tell me these things. I'm generally a shyer person so I rarely try to go out of my way to find a "mentor" as the wikipedia articles try to recommend. just for that alone I thank you.

as for the other stuff, I really only nominated those articles because I had been doing very heavy copywriting and reformatting poorly written areas, but I didn't add much new information. I can see now that was probably not the smartest idea, or at the very least a very good idea, so I will actually go out of my way to look up some new information.

as well, whilst I do believe that much discussion does exist in scholarly forums about these characters, just from what I hear it seems very likely that these analysis' are rather on their live-action counterparts. Since in the MCU most of these counterparts get their own Wikipedia pages, those links unfortunately apply more towards them, at least as far as I know. ModlordD (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD: For MCU counterparts; it does tend to depend on the article, but if the bulk of coverage is about the MCU or a film adaptation, then a merge may be wise (Since there's not really a reason for separation if the dev/receptions aren't vast enough to warrant a merge). I did something similar with Peacemaker (character) recently when I nommed it for Good Article since the bulk of his reception is in relation to the DCEU adaptation, though I imagine with the two you nominated there may be enough for a split since they have far more noteworthy comics histories than Peacemaker (Though I am mostly just guestimating here).

Let me know if I can help with source searching and the like! I can definitely try finding stuff in places, for example like the Wikipedia Library (Which I am unsure if you have access to, if need be I can search in there for you). I'd also suggest, if you need further help, reaching out to Thebiguglyalien or Wrangler1981, who both have been doing some heavy work in the Marvel characters area, especially on some big names. They may be able to point you to resources for the area I may be unaware of. Let me know if I can clarify anything else! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey, I did a lot of work on Quicksilver's publication history. Can you see if that looks good. I'll do some more of the article soon but I just wanted to make sure I'm on the right track ModlordD (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi ModlordD. Thank you for your work on List of Moon Knight supporting characters. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 06:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi ModlordD. Thank you for your work on List of Moon Knight enemies. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 06:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Quicksilver (Marvel Comics), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:59, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Quicksilver (Marvel Comics), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)