User talk:Mox Eden

Do you mind reassesing the article as it has been substantially edited after your previous rating. I see rater is giving it a bit higher rating. Thanks in anticipation, Testingamewwe (talk) 01:26, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mox Eden ?????? Testingamewwe (talk) 22:24, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mox Eden I can see that you reverted my ratings despite not answering to my comments since days , will you please reasses this atleast to b class, as rater is giving it b in its present form? or i am going to revert your current rating? see .idht. Testingamewwe (talk) 07:26, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mox Eden you should either communicate or desist edit warring to build Wikipedia:Consensus. idht is not helping here at all. Testingamewwe (talk) 07:28, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mox Eden Also I am not satisfied with the current copyedit by a member of GOCE, I think it should be copyedited again to meet rigrous copyedit standards of wikipedia to nominate this to ga and eventually to fa? Testingamewwe (talk) 07:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Dhtwiki? Testingamewwe (talk) 07:35, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mox Eden i HAVE ADDED CLEAN UP TAG NOW THERE Testingamewwe (talk) 07:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I see that I did what to me was a full copy edit of the article (in answer to a request?). However, I don't see the usual talkback template that I would have placed on your page, if you were the requester. What does the article need, in your estimation, in terms of copy editing? Dhtwiki (talk) 07:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I think it It does not comply with MOS guidelines, probably moshon Testingamewwe (talk) 07:51, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Dhtwiki Testingamewwe (talk) 07:51, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

MOS:HON (if that's what you mean; the capitalization is important) allows exceptions, such as Where an honorific is so commonly attached to a name that the name is rarely found in English-language reliable sources without it...; e.g. Mother Teresa, Mahatma Gandhi. It is apt to be difficult for an English speaker to judge the inclusion of, say, "Sayyid" or "Sayyadna" (should be "Sayyidna"?). In general, a copy editor is looking for intelligibility and readability and will not be too concerned with hitting all the marks with respect to the MOS. Subject editors who see that an article falls short in the latter regard can make such changes themselves. Another copy edit isn't necessary going to solve all problems. Dhtwiki (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

It is not my job to give an article a certain rating just because I gave the initial C. Also, stop pinging my name every time you use my talk page. A user talk page notifies a user no matter what. And stop changing the assessment out of spite. I can see that. Mox Eden (talk) 07:50, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mainul Ahsan Nobel, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gopalganj was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Welcome, welcome, welcome Mox Eden! I'm glad that you are joining the March 2026 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 10:56, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for copyediting rodent. Would you be able to copyedit great white shark? Its at FAC and people are now requesting a copyedit. I would really appreciate it. Thank you. 22:47, 23 March 2026 (UTC) LittleJerry (talk) 22:47, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Sure. I'll do that shortly. Mox Eden (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. While doing that, could you fix the specific prose issues mentioned by UC in the FAC? LittleJerry (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sten Lex, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:46, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:19, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

• The May 2026 administrator elections are set to proceed.
• We plan to use the following schedule:
  • April 29–May 5: Candidate sign-up
  • May 8–May 12: Discussion phase
  • May 13–May 19: SecurePoll voting phase
• If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

• April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates
• May 8–12: Discussion phase
• May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

• The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
• Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
• The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
• The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
• Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

The discussion phase of the May 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• May 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
• May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
• Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Mox Eden. I appreciate the effort you are putting into your guide. I have a quibble with one of your categorizations though, which is the distinction between "Content creation" and "Vetted content". The DYK/GA/FA route is one many, but not all, editors follow. Some creators of excellent content don't bother with any formal peer review at all. Were I writing a guide (I'm not, for obvious reasons) I might split those categories. It's your guide at the end of the day though: just offering food for thought. Best, Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:05, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

@Mox Eden Commenting a slightly related request to your AELECT guide here. Would it be possible for you to include current user permissions and/or Admin Score as well in your guide? EaglesFan37 (talk) 19:11, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

I'm not really planning on adding more categories anytime soon. For this remark in particular, user permissions can easily be obtained from scripts such as User:PleaseStand/User info. It's also pretty easy to get a good score on the Admin Score tool once you reach the de facto requirement of 1 or 2 years and 10K edits, so it's only really useful for identifying obvious no-gos. Mox Eden (talk) 00:07, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

• May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
• Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)