User talk:Mrsanjeevyadav

Hello, Mrsanjeevyadav, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Mrsanjeevyadav, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Waqar💬 15:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

why you are interfering with my page? Mrsanjeevyadav (talk) 15:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

what was wrong with my page? Mrsanjeevyadav (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Mrsanjeevyadav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waqar💬 15:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Mrsanjeevyadav. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 17:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JBW (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Mrsanjeevyadav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aydoh8^[contribs] 04:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

I see that you have removed two external links from the article William M. Dalton. I've checked those links, and you were certainly right to remove them, so thank you for your that. However, it would have been much more helpful if you had given a few words in an edit summary saying why you were removing the links, so that I didn't have to follow the links to find out why. Please always give a brief explanation of what your editing is doing, in an edit summary. JBW (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate you spared time to communicate with me. I should have done what you are pointing to but in a hurry it was submitted and later I realised it.

Nice to meet you. Mrsanjeevyadav (talk) 07:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Arcrev1. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Salma Sultan—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arcrev1 (talk) 06:48, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more reliable and independent references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swami Brahmananda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

There are thousands of Wikipedia pages with far less number of references for same length of article.

Every reference is from book that is considered is authentic. What is meant by independent reference? He is not a rockstar. Please understand the time and place of his existance and popularity of mission at that time. Mrsanjeevyadav (talk) 13:02, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

After Draft:Swami Brahmananda had six times been declined by six different reviewers because of lack of citations to suitable sources, you resubmitted it without making any changes to sourcing at all. Please don't do that; it achieves nothing apart from taking reviewers away from more useful work. JBW (talk) 21:40, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swami Brahmananda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Dear sir, greetings.

My submission has been declined for about a year in the name of independent references or lack of references , whereas articles related to God brothers of Swami Brahmananda whose page I have been trying to creat, has far less number of references and they all belong to Ramakrishna mission.

Please try to understand that Swami Brahmananda was not a public figure like swami Vivekanand and but he had no less impact on Hinduism compared with Vivekanand.

I request you to kindly reconsider my submission after going through the article titled Discoples of Ramakrishna.

So far no reviewer has replied to me about my side of story. Mrsanjeevyadav (talk) 09:20, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Mrsanjeevyadav. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Swami Brahmananda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, M. P. Abdussamad Samadani, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:01, 19 January 2026 (UTC)