User talk:Percy James91

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hi Percy James91! I noticed your contributions to Hairy Maclary and Friends and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ―Panamitsu (talk) 08:22, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Do not add a period (full stop) after a sentence fragment. See MOS:PERIOD. CodeTalker (talk) 15:58, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Toy Story 2, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Fixing parameters

HI, Percy James91, welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been deleting information in infoboxes from a number of biographical articles based on "unknown parameters". However, there are a number of infoboxes for individuals, with different parameters. The basic one is "Template: Infobox person", but there are also more specific ones, dealing with officeholders, politicians, and musical artists, to name a few. Those templates generally have more specific parameters, so changing the infobox makes the parameter work. Also, sometimes the parameter name was not listed properly by whoever added the information, so fixing the parameter name makes it work (eg by changing "sister" to "relatives"). I've gone through your edits and have restored a lot of the information, sometimes by changing the infobox, and sometimes by correcting the parameter name. May I suggest that in the future, if you find a non-functioning parameter, you see if there is a way to fix the parameter description, or by changing the infobox to a more specific one? We're here to build an encyclopedia, and if the information about a person is accurate, we should investigate to see if there's a way to include it in the infobox, rather than just deleting it. Best wishes. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Reverend

In general, we do not use titles like "Reverend" when referring to people, even if they are named that way on books they wrote. See MOS:REVEREND. Thanks, Opolito (talk) 23:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

Hello, I'm Tube of Light. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Talking Tom & Friends (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tube·of·Light 04:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to India, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — Benison (Beni · talk) 02:37, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at India shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Additionally, the article is a Contentious topic, where sanctions are applicable. Thanks. — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:18, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Sorry Percy James91 (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Important Notice

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Benison (Beni · talk) 02:40, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Hello, I'm Iiii I I I. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Iiii I I I (talk) 05:06, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Thomas & Friends shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Hey why are there people disregarding my edit? Percy James91 (talk) 20:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Because efn notes have been considered more reliable than note tags. efns reduce confusion and avoid cluttering the article. NacreousPuma855 (talk) 22:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Your technical move request

Hello Percy James91, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 12:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

John Simmit

Do you have a source that verifies how John Simmit is best known? How was this measured? Who best knows him this way? It appears to be both a guess, and a completely unnecessary claim. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 08:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Your decision to revert on both on the John Simmit and Dave Thompson (comedian) articles, without any attempt to justify or discuss what you are doing is disruptive behaviour, and suggests that you're more interested in making a point than improving these articles. Please explain your position on the Simmit talk page and the Thompson talk page. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:23, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Since you have again declined to offer any explanation for your edits, or reach any consensus about the article content, I'm again restoring my edits. I shall treat further unexplained reverts as not in line with Wikipedia policy, and purely disruptive behaviour which is not intended to improve the articles.

It doesn't have to be this way. You say on your user page that you feel "discouraged about Wikipedia". Wikipedia is a more enjoyable project if you commit to the spirit of collaboration and accept that your work will get changed by others. Even when you think they're wrong. Most editors here have the best of intentions, so picking entrenched arguments with others is always going to be a disheartening experience that no-one feels good about, and no-one "wins". --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 09:23, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

John Oliver

What are you doing? Any move like that should be discussed. CAVincent (talk) 22:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Farmer.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Farmer.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello, I'm Chicdat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jeff have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:32, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for block evasion. You are using this account to evade an IP block that was targetting you, as an editor. I've set the block length for approximately the same duration as your IP block. Please ensure you make no edits while your account or IP(s) are blocked or you will likely be blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:05, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Percy James91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I promise I will use no IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia again. I have done so many good edits. The edit that I propose to make is in List of Thomas & Friends voice actors which is adding William Hope (actor) with a source. Also another edit is adding succession boxes in Jerry Nelson article. I know all the rules so I promise not to use other IP addresses again.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for disruptive editing on your original IP. An unblock request would have to address the reasons for your initial block - ie, that you understand what was disruptive about your earlier edits and that you won't do that again. But please take CoffeeCrumbs' advice instead of requesting another unblock. Wikipedia will still be here in September. You can edit again then. asilvering (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Percy James91 (talk) 19:09, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

If you decline my unblock request then give me a tutorial on how to get get unblocked. Percy James91 (talk) 19:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Honestly, I think your best way to get unblocked would be waiting out the two months and avoiding all block evasion over that timeframe. Block evasion is quite frequently an indefinite block, so I think you should just take the win, and demonstrate that you can resist logged-out editing while you wait. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 19:40, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

I will edit on the simple english Percy James91 (talk) 19:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Well I wish I could also be banned from viewing Wikipedia. I think i will leave this website forever. Percy James91 (talk) 21:14, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:25, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Sigh. You had a shot here with a timed block, but you keep editing logged out and have created the account Mr Wilfred Wolf to get around the block. This is now an indefinite block as you're not able to follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:25, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Unblock request

Percy James91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

Hey guys. I am so sorry for creating another account and using multiple IPs while I was blocked. I should have waited patiently for my block to expire. But since I was blocked indefinitely I have now learned about Block Evasion. I promise I won't do that for two months I promise. I know the rules of Wikipedia so I won't do block Evasion for two months. Also I need to work on the drafts I created.

When I first edited wikipedia I did not know what was Block Evasion. But know I know what it is. It is trying to use multiple IPs and accounts to edit while the original account is blocked, so I won't let this happen for two months. The reason for Two Months is that was the original blocking time. I have made good edits, so I won't disrupt Wikipedia also.

I will edit on other Wikimedia projects and not use multiple IPs or accounts to edit on the English Wiki, so I deserve to be blocked for one year. And in that one year period I won't use multiple IPs or Accounts to edit the English Wiki. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I suggest you take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts or logged out editing. PhilKnight (talk) 14:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Percy James91 (talk) 13:14, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

UTRS

Appeal lodged, and declined. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:19, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Percy James91. I read your most recent appeal and told you to come back in a year. On second thought, I don't think that's a good idea. But I will reduce the length of your block. You seem to have haggled yourself down from 10 years to 5 years to 1 year. That's not really how haggling works. My one and final offer is four years, which I will apply right now. If you're caught block evading again, I'm sure that @Ponyo, or whoever else catches you, will put the block back to indefinite again. So, please stay away from editing, as you've promised. Good luck. -- asilvering (talk) 00:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

You evaded your block while logged out. Given this, I have reinstated your indefinite block. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:24, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Edward the Blue Engine

Hello, Percy James91. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edward the Blue Engine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.