User talk:PokemonPerson

Thanks for your contributions to As You Wish (book). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaCore talk 21:37, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, PokemonPerson. I've removed the 'Criticism' section you added to OpenStreetMap. I think Gjb0zWxOb's rationale of WP:CRITS is poor because WP:CRITS is just an essay; nevertheless, the section (in the state you added it) is clearly WP:UNDUE. A Wikipedia article is meant to cover notable aspects of a subject, and a blog post written by one person (regardless of their former relationship to the subject) is not that. Wikipedia has sections about controversies when they've received substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 00:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

That is ok. I'd like to continue the discussion at the talk page, but it's ok to have the section removed while it is under discussion.PokémonPerson 16:47, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

I've decided to readd the criticism section as there has not been any discussion at the talk page. PokémonPerson 16:41, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, PokemonPerson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AI-first, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on John Woke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:11, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Shayy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 3 § Shayy until a consensus is reached. KrispyBlueJays (talk) 23:52, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Femisphere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Femisphere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—David Eppstein (talk) 01:49, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

The article Enderman (YouTuber) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NPERSON.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:09, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Can I request it be moved to draftspace so it can be worked on more? PokémonPerson 15:54, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Bloodwort (disambiguation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 9 § Bloodwort (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Sweet sandwich time has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 9 § Sweet sandwich time until a consensus is reached. Strugglehouse (talk) 16:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi PokemonPerson. I wanted to let you know that I remove the CSD tag you placed on the above draft. G1 only applies to pages that consist entirely of patent nonsense, and there's plenty of intelligible text there. Feel free to nominate them at MFD if you still think it should be deleted. Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

The same goes for Draft:Use of computer in education. Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2026 (UTC)