User talk:Rayanfds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Rayanfds! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raj Sounds and Lights (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Onmyway22 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NFILM. IMDb and BookMyShow are not considered as reliable national critics to consider the reviews.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Onmyway22 talk 07:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rayanfds! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onmyway22 talk 07:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nirmillem Nirmonem (2019 film) (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onmyway22 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:FILM. Lacks critical reception and no reviews from national critics. The released films must have at least two national critics review to establish the film notability. Make sure to cover the issues mentioned before submitting next time. Happy editing.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Onmyway22 talk 08:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Nirmillem Nirmonem (2019 film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nirmillem Nirmonem (2019 film). Thanks! Dwaipayan (talk) 01:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
I have updated citations as per the instructions can I get my article reviewed again. Rayanfds (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
You need to re-submit the article for review (because the earlier submission was declined).--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Nirmillem Nirmonem (2019 film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nirmillem Nirmonem (2019 film). Thanks! Dwaipayan (talk) 15:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Added Cites as requested, Thank You for helping me out. Rayanfds (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Can I add the movie trailer links on the Article. Rayanfds (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilson Kateel (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 18:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plangle Studio (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 04:20, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nirmillem Nirmonem (2019 film) has been accepted

Nirmillem Nirmonem (2019 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 TT me 19:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank You for your time :) Rayanfds (talk) 03:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raj Sounds and Lights (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Excessively sourced to announcements that appear to be based on press releases or are WP:PRIMARY coverage of press conferences. Without clicking every single reference I have not yet found amongst them any reviews of the film by established critics. If there are indeed some references that provide in-depth, independent reviews then please read WP:THREE and list those references on the draft's talk page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Tulu films of 2023 (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Tulu films of 2023 instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There is an article, but it has too little information, and needs to be expanded from this draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft List of Tulu films of 2023 is moved to mainspace.

After some research I found that some other user copied your draft and pasted it to mainspace. As wikipedia appreciate your efforts I moved your submission to mainspace. Please enhance this draft. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 03:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

thank you :) 103.141.112.9 (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
) Rayanfds (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Plangle Studio

Information icon Hello, Rayanfds. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Plangle Studio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Plangle Studio

Hello, Rayanfds. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Plangle Studio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilson Kateel (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucky Draw 777 (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The draft is based on a single source which happens to host press releases. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wilson Kateel

Information icon Hello, Rayanfds. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wilson Kateel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Konkani cinema. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

k sure Rayanfds (talk) 12:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucky Draw 777 has been accepted

Lucky Draw 777, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette (Let's talk together!) 19:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you so much :) Rayanfds (talk) 03:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mangalorean Catholic Dialect Films

Information icon Hello, Rayanfds. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mangalorean Catholic Dialect Films, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mangalorean Catholic Dialect Films

Hello, Rayanfds. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mangalorean Catholic Dialect Films".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:07, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Fondacho Misther moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fondacho Misther. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it has insufficient context. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 07:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Fondacho Misther, you may be blocked from editing. Why are you moving the page? Please stop. CycloneYoris talk! 07:22, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

my bad , really sorry for the mistake , i wanted to removed the page, can you suggest me how to remove the page Rayanfds (talk) 07:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
No worries. I can move the page to draft space if you like, so you can continue to work on it there. Apologies for the harsh warning btw. CycloneYoris talk! 07:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
yeah its ok, i respect wikipedia rules and regulations and im avid contributor, but somethings im still learning, actually its now moved to draft space i reckon if no please do it, thank you Rayanfds (talk) 07:31, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
You're welcome. Here's the link where you can find the draft: Draft:Fondacho Misther 1. CycloneYoris talk! 07:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fondacho Misther (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Goku from bd was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
G0KU⬃⬃⬃ 16:01, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI