User talk:Rohanregins

Hello, Rohanregins!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Tankishguy 12:18, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, Tankishguy. Rohanregins (talk) 07:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I have reviewed some of the changes you've made. They seem unnecessary and infact you've introduced new grammar errors (grammar, not 'grammer'). In one edit, to Amod Kanth, you changed what a person was quoted as saying. Please take more care. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, curb safe charmer, thank you for the correction. Noted. Will keep it in mind when i make my next edits. Rohanregins (talk) 07:06, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Salute of the Jugger, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. content added under production unsourced, IMDB is also an unreliable WP:USERGENERATED source per WP:IMDB and shouldn't be used as a source in articles Waxworker (talk) 16:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi, @Waxworker. Thank you so much for bringing this up, and thank you for the correction. I will keep in mind next time I do citations. Rohanregins (talk) 04:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Salute of the Jugger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Barry Wom (talk) 16:12, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up. Rohanregins (talk) 06:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dormition Cathedral, Vladimir. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please stop adding a duplicate lead paragraph to articles that already have a lead. CodeTalker (talk) 17:52, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up. Rohanregins Rohanregins (talk) 05:04, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Paktika Province. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:OVERLINK and MOS:UNITNAMES. CodeTalker (talk) 17:54, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up. Rohanregins (talk) 05:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm afraid that was not a short description. In fact it looked like a duplicate lead. You might want to ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE if you aren't clear what I mean. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 09:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Tariq Chauhan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AusLondonder (talk) 08:02, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm the admin who considered this article for speedy delete. While this article was brought up for two previous AfDs, only the second AfD achieved a consensus to delete b/c the first was a speedy keep. After examining the current article and comparing it with the previously deleted article, I'm not convinced it's eligible for speedy delete b/c this version has new reliable citations indicating significance compared to the deleted article. As such, the speedy delete was rejected.

That said, it can be brought up for a third WP:AFD if desired. I also cleaned up the article some and also added additional citations supporting notability. SouthernNights (talk) 17:19, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello Rohanregins. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Tariq Chauhan, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rohanregins. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rohanregins|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MightyRanger (talk) 03:33, 14 February 2026 (UTC)