User talk:SchwartzMorgan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proposed deletion of Abdullah Sani
Hello, SchwartzMorgan
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Abdullah Sani, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- David A. Jaffe
- Thomas Pheasant
- added a link pointing to Portfolio
- Zsigmond Széchenyi
- added a link pointing to Traveler
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nurul Qomar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sundanese and Rector.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Willie Salim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Willie Salim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mekomo (talk) 10:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-followed_TikTok_accounts He was on the 16th list, if the persons below him got Wikipedia pages, why wouldnt he? SchwartzMorgan (talk) 11:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hi SchwartzMorgan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Willie Salim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Willie Salim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pollia (talk) 18:19, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- yes i think it would SchwartzMorgan (talk) 11:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- @SchwartzMorgan, BusterD, and Pollia: OK, SchwartzMorgan, I note your otherwise constructive contributions to the English language Wikipedia, but I would also ask you whether you think whether the outcome of a notional Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willie Salim or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willie Agustin Salim would have a "keep" outcome? A proactive WP:BEFORE type search on your part about Willie Salim may possibly assist you here. 11:12, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kawin Ganteng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SCTV.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Derry Sudarisman moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Derry Sudarisman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:28, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Derry Sudarisman
Hello, SchwartzMorgan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Derry Sudarisman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:09, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Derry Sudarisman

Hello, SchwartzMorgan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Derry Sudarisman".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:53, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Fadli Zon Library
Hello SchwartzMorgan,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fadli Zon Library for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
September 2025
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Fadli Zon Library, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to Fadli Zon#Library and culture. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.
Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Ckfasdf (talk) 02:24, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Kawin Ganteng
Hello SchwartzMorgan, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kawin Ganteng, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kawin Ganteng.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ckfasdf}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to post-1978 Iranian politics, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
CS1 error on List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Twelve-Day war and the 2026 Iran war
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Twelve-Day war and the 2026 Iran war, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)