Wikiwand AI

User talk:Shivikaso

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hi Shivikaso! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Zalaraz (talk) 08:31, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) caste-related topics in South Asia.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Zalaraz (talk) 08:32, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Reminder

You have been warned just minutes ago that you should stop editing the area of Indian military until you have gained WP:ECP. This includes Dhurandhar The Revenge movie which discuss Indian military events. Make no further edits to that page for discussing the subject. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 08:41, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Along these lines, I would recommend reading through WP:ECREXPLAIN, which lays out expectations and best practices for new editors in highly contentious topics. signed, Rosguill talk 15:59, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Warning

You have edited Khasdesa, and your edits involve caste related stuff in spite of the notice on South Asian Social Group! Please consider this as a warning! You are not supposed to edit anything related to caste or social group until you become an extended confirmed user. Ekdalian (talk) 07:44, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

can you please clearfy where did i edit related to caste Shivikaso (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
You have edited a sentence on Khasa people and modified the caste name. You removed Rajput caste. You want more? You may be blocked from editing in case you continue such violations! Ekdalian (talk) 08:27, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
I have removed Rajput because Rajput is a caste. While khasa is a tribe so rajput is not related to them . Shivikaso (talk) 09:10, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm TonySt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Harish Rawat have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. tony 03:17, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making any edits concerning caste in South Asia (example) until you've made at least 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days. This is a contentious topic restriction, see #Introduction to contentious topics, ignoring it might lead to your account getting blocked. Nakonana (talk) 06:07, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

You have violated the same again by editing Basnet! Please consider this as a warning! You may be blocked from editing for persisitent violation of our rules or policies! Ekdalian (talk) 16:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
@Ekdalian you've issued the 4th warning regarding caste edits if I'm counting correctly.
  1. #Warning
  2. #April 2026 for this edit
  3. the reminder by me
  4. now again by you
Although not all warnings were labeled as "warnings". Nakonana (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phool Dei (May 6)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Flyingphoenixchips, left the following feedback:
This draft reads like a resume or curriculum vitae. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a professional networking website or a place to promote yourself or your services. We also strongly discourage writing about yourself.

Articles about people must meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
fix the references

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Phool Dei to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:32, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Shivikaso! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:32, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Shivikaso, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:32, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phool Dei (June 6)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Phool Dei to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Thilsebatti (talk) 02:37, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Neonmen1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Neonmen1. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Izno (talk) 05:11, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks