User talk:Spatms

Thanks for creating Doug Shaffer, Spatms!

Wikipedia editor Uncletomwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

thank you for the article,its well written!

To reply, leave a comment on Uncletomwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating University Medical Center New Orleans, Spatms!

Wikipedia editor Samtar just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great looking article! :)

To reply, leave a comment on Samtar's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Please stop adding unsourced championship claims in front of existing references that do not cover the claimed year. You have done this more than one recently. Meters (talk) 01:43, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

1. Mind ya own business and stop being a dictator.

2. Dont come at me without examples. Lazy as hell on your part.

3. Do better

Thanks Spatms (talk) 08:08, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 07:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to LSU Soccer Stadium when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:53, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Your edits are becoming disruptive. You have been warned multiple times about the need to use preview to check your edits, yet you continue to introduce unknown parameters into articles. You did this again at Harry Caray's Italian Steakhouse when you modified the page, you once again did this. If you continue your disruptive editing, you may find yourself blocked from editing. Please take the time to review your edits moving forward. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:21, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your editing is becomming disruptive due to your failure to heed the multiple warnings that have been given. Please understand that one of the requirements for editing on Wikipedia is communicating with fellow editors. While you are not required to respond to every comment on your talk page, failure to respond to any of the multiple warnings, or to heed the advice that has been given, indicates an intentional failure to communicate. Please respond to this message and acknowledge that you understand that communication is required. Additionally please ensure that you have read the multiple warnings that have been given to you on your talk page. Failure to communicate may result in you being blocked from editing. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:21, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

1. 1, you need to calm down and stop being an internet tough guy. We both know you don't treat people like this in everyday interactions and we also know the reason why. #2, it's mistakes not some grand conspiracy you invented in your head. #3, I did not see your message on my talk page until just now b/c I mostly avoid coming to Wikipedia to edit anymore because of how admins like yourself treat editors. How you and other admins now act dictatorial on this site is why Wikipedia has lost credibility and editors. Most reasonable people have left and the leftovers are dictatorial in nature and stunt growth. #4, saying I'm being disruptive and threatening me with being banned is over the top ridiculous but how the leftover admins sadly now treat editors. I've been an editor since 2012, so ask yourself, am I really trying to cause problems and be a vandal? Step back, get a 30k foot view and think about it. Yes, I could do better with my editing b/c I guess I made mistakes, but my intent was just to upload photos to improve the site. All, I have done is add galleries and photos, which I have done in the past and it didn't cause problems. Obviously, I didn't notice the issue and I did not get notifications you left a message on my talk page until now. #5, thanks for ruining the experience. I came to Wikipedia to look at what I created and I'm dealing with a person threatening to ban me for mistakes. #6, if need need to do better with my edits, you need to do better as an admin. As mentioned, your approach is dictatorial as many admins are now. Please be the first admin to start a trend being a better admin, so people will want to edit and improve the site. #7, I'd like to apoligize for my editing errors and will gladly do so, if you'll apologize for your approach with me. My guess is you'll prob just ban me to show off your powers. If not banned, I'll try to be more cognizant of my edits and not make mistakes or cause problems, which wasn't my original intent. Good day to you.

Spatms (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Oy vei... So may issues with this that I don't even know where to start. I'll keep this short.

1. I'm not an admin. Never said I was and a simple check would have showed you that I'm not.
2. You were given MULTIPLE warnings and chose to ignore all of them.
3. I couldn't care less if you apologize or not.
4. You have now been officially warned multiple times and have chosen not only not to learn from those warnings, but to lash at the person trying to help.
5. Continue to edit however you please but don't be surprised if you find yourself at ANI for failure to engage and repeated disruptive editing

Best of luck. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

1. Not checking, so please refrain from acting like one if you're not. Overreach.

2. False, I didn't ignore any of them because I didn't know they existed until I first replied to you and addressed it immediately when I found out.

3.Honestly, same. Was just a test to judge and see what you're about. Got what I needed.

4. I'm not lashing out, I'm pointing out. Also, see #2. If a person doesn't know "warnings" exist, then it's hard to know you did anything wrong and impossible to learn from it. One must come before the other. Strange way to go about helping by threatening to ban someone. Thanks for the help though.

5. Once again, overreach much? I was not purposely disruptive editing as your "opinion" states. Reporting me as such would be false and a lie, but I feel that doesnt matter to you.

I could explain more, but not sure you'd understand my point of view as you haven't previously and will certainly disregard it even if you did. Good news, friend, I'm rarely on Wikipedia because of these types of interactions with overagressive editors and admins. In general, it is sad to see inclusivity be abandoned due to these types of interactions since it was a founding principle of the site, but here we are. In summary, not lashing out, not disruptive editing or vandalizing and our business here should be concluded. I wish you a good day. Spatms (talk) 11:34, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Southeastern Louisiana Lions and Lady Lions soccer indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:34, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Louisiana–Monroe Warhawks soccer indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:45, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Category:Mixed martial arts in the United States by populated place has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 14:29, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Category:Mixed martial arts venues in Washington, D.C. has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 15:50, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Centenary Gentlemen and Ladies volleyball indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:54, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Category:Rugby union teams by country and populated place has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mclay1 (talk) 13:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)