User talk:Tempdispacc

Hi, @LuniZunie, Can you please redirect this page to Qadri Shattari, as I am not able to create a redirect myself as it is confined to Auticonfirmed users only? Tempdispacc (talk) 00:35, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @LuniZunie; Love you. Tempdispacc (talk) 00:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@Tempdispacc Let me know if you need anything else =D – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 00:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@LuniZunie Can you please request whitelisting of qadrishattari.xyz per WP:ELOFFICIAL as I am unable to add this due to .xyz filter; I will be grateful to you for that. Please see, MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. Tempdispacc (talk) 00:44, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@LuniZunie Per the Whitelist page history it seems that they do consider whitelisting of established websites. Thanks in anticipation. Tempdispacc (talk) 00:45, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@Tempdispacc Can you provide me for a reason why so I can go ahead and create the request?

Also, have you edited on another account in the past? – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 00:46, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@LuniZunie Zunu, I am long term IP editor. Actually I want to add info from that site WP:About self; I think this should be a reasonable request for Whitelisting. I hope you will be able to help me. Thanks in anticipation. Tempdispacc (talk) 00:48, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 00:52, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks I am to you for that grateful@LuniZunie; Do you mind quoting one more policy, WP: ELOFFICIAL there to make the appeal more compelling. Thanks in anticipation Tempdispacc (talk) 00:54, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@LuniZunie Zunu, it seems you forgot to add For Qadri Shattari in the whitelist request. @Beetstra; Thanks for your ping, as you can see from my contributions, actually I am trying to de-stub Qadri Shattari, which is there in mainspace for almost two years in a stub state. Actually I need qadrishattari.xyz to add info WP:About self to the already existing article. Also it appears to be the official website of the order, so WP: ELOFFICIAL might excuse this to whitelist. Thanks for your kind consideration. Regards Tempdispacc (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi, but I have a question, why did you not request this yourself, why through proxy? Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 12:40, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

+1 – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 12:41, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @Beetstra. oops my bad! I was in the misconception that making whitelist request is exclusive to Auticonfirmed users. Actually I was not able to create redirect myself. My apologies for this. Tempdispacc (talk) 12:52, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

No worries, it just was strange. No, there are only a few things that you can't do as ot autoconfirmed, this is allowed. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 13:00, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@Beetstra; Thanks so much once again for your kind consideration. Regards; Tempdispacc (talk) 13:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:12, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick You have reverted other good faith edits from different sources too; please restore, I will try to paraphrase it a bit. Tempdispacc (talk) 13:29, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

It is standard practice when reverting a copyright violation to do a revision deletion of all intervening edits. It is a good practice to compose all substantive edits in an external editor so that you have them in case something like this happens. I am very concerned by your statement that "I will try to paraphrase it a bit." Paraphrasing "a bit" is still a copyright violation. I realize you are speaking casually and perhaps didn't mean it quite that literally but I urge you to read Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing. Quite a number of new editors appeared to be under the impression that if you start with quoted text and change a couple words it "cures" the copyright problem. That's not the case. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:03, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

I temporarily changed the subsequent edits so that you can recover the material. Please let me know when you've recovered your other edit so I can restore the revision deletion. Thanks. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:06, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick Thanks  Done. Tempdispacc (talk) 09:26, 16 November 2025 (UTC)