User talk:The planned bug

Hello The planned bug and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:18, 11 February 2026 (UTC) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:18, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Who spammed me, please reply user The planned bug (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Names of Rus', Russia and Ruthenia, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. LordCollaboration (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

no thank you! The planned bug (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself and your interests, your goals related to editing Wikipedia, and disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

• an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
• a workspace for a draft article
• a personal website, blog, or social media site
• a space for self-promotion or other advertising
• a CV, resumé, or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Do not impersonate an administrator. You are not an administrator. LordCollaboration (talk) 10:24, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Moscow Monorail. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:07, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Merge and delete, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at AEL Limassol B.C., you may be blocked from editing. You are breaking templates, creating links to the wrong pages, pretending to be an admin for some reason, and being generally disruptive. Please stop before you get blocked. LordCollaboration (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at End user. jolielover♥talk 11:53, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hanna Hopko. LordCollaboration (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 13:41, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

The planned bug, thanks for your interest in Mentorship issues. I undid your two comments (diff) at WT:Mentorship; one was an apparent attempt to archive an active discussion or declare it closed, and the other was a comment introduced into a boxed section of text copied exactly from another page. Your comment about the link should be added at the bottom of the discussion, if you still want to add it, but note that Help:Directory#Technical_help is not broken.

Speaking of Mentorship, did you know that your mentor is [[User:]]? You can contact them anytime, via the Mentorship module at the bottom of your user homepage. Feel free to ask questions about editing Wikipedia at the Wikipedia:Teahouse as well. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

@Mathglot I will definitely contact my mentor. @Lajmmoore The planned bug (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Housekeeping note: it appears that the {{#mentor:...}} magic word stops working when a user is blocked. I will contact Growth about this. Mathglot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

@Mathglot:, see T392280 on the impact of blocks on the mentor-mentee link. AllyD (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

The planned bug, what were you trying to accomplish with this removal of 15kb of text at Wikipedia talk:Mentorship? This was (and is) an active discussion, and it will be archived at some point in the future when it becomes stale, but blanking an active discussion is never a good idea. Please avoid doing that in the future. Mathglot (talk) 11:40, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

In addition to the unwarranted removal of content at Wikipedia talk:Mentorship above, I note the following as well:

• unexplained removal of 11kb of content at 11:41, 13 Feb. at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log (diff), since reverted;
• unexplained removal of 21kb of content at 11:32, 13 Feb. at End user (diff), since reverted.

Your edits are becoming disruptive, requiring other editors to clean up after you. May I ask what your plan is here at Wikipedia? Do you have an interest in improving articles in a particular area? There are volunteers here willing to help you, but if you continue on your present course, you risk having your editing privileges suspended. Mathglot (talk) 12:15, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Цитировать в Интернете, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:57, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is here. Mathglot (talk) 21:31, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

The planned bug, just to be clear: this discussion at AN/I raises issues about your editing pattern that may lead to suspension of your editing privileges. You may wish to participate at the discussion to give your perspective about it. Mathglot (talk) 21:40, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Too late for that, now. Please see the section below about how to appeal your block. Mathglot (talk) 07:59, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2026 (UTC)