User talk:Thejamescycle

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bolton Wanderers F.C., may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Thejamescycle,

Thank you for creating M61 derby.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This term would be better as a redirect to List of association football rivalries in the United Kingdom unless you can provide enough sources to prove it is notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Orange sticker}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Orange sticker (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

The article M61 derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and I can only find one passing use of this phrase in a single BBC article. Alternative to deletion: redirect to List of association football rivalries in the United Kingdom

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

Orange sticker (talk) 22:34, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Fuck off mate the page isn’t causing any harm Thejamescycle (talk) 09:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Orange sticker (talk) 09:46, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

why do you want to delete my hard work this is something i care a lot about, people have fought blood has been spilled in westoughton over what the page is about take it seriously. Thejamescycle (talk) 09:56, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm not Orange sticker but I'll reply anyway. Wikipedia's sourcing requirements apply to every article and right now, the article has zero sources. If the topic is notable, you can demonstrate that through significant coverage, for example newspaper articles; see WP:SIGCOV. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:17, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M61 derby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M61 derby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Orange sticker (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Nigel Farage. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 13:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed)Thejamescycle (talk) 13:17, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. AusLondonder (talk) 13:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nigel Farage. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SmartSE (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 18:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

The article London Buses Route P13 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Fandom is not a reliable source (per WP:FANDOM).

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. _♥^✿ TheMDC4 chat :3 ^✿_♥ 16:55, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thejamescycle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I do not believe I have done anything wrong Thejamescycle (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given that your edit to Nigel Farage was so offside that it had to removed from non-admin view, you not thinking you did anything worng would be a reason to extend the block, not remove it. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Refer to this diff. PhilKnight (talk) 18:48, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Apparently the repeated personal attacks today (1, 2) was "not doing anything wrong." AusLondonder (talk) 18:58, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article London Buses Route P13 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses Route P13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 19:04, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alan Stubbs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:13, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

but what i added was correct. Thejamescycle (talk) 12:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Rodri (footballer, born 1996), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:REPEATLINK. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 13:10, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Liverpool F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

how is it vandalism when it is correct information? give it a rest mate you seem a bit sad. got nothing better to do on easter monday then go around destroying what other people add to wiki cause you cant do anything constructive yourself? if i wrote grass was green would you be kicking up a fuss? Thejamescycle (talk) 13:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

"a bit sad": what, are you twelve years old? The sooner you get bored of this place, the better. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

course your upset your from the losing side. roses are red. Thejamescycle (talk) 13:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Nothing better to do with your Easter Monday than trawl through someone's Wikipedia user page? Why not vandalise it while you're at it, I can tell you're thinking about it? Mattythewhite (talk) 13:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

nah tbf lad youve got quite a good user page there, rather jealous. wouldnt want to destroy it, rather use as a future reference point, its well good. Thejamescycle (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

how did you make that box with all your key info? Thejamescycle (talk) 13:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

The boxes on the left hand side? The code for it is here. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

dunno what to do with that, or how to add something like that to my page, or how to edit any of the content. Thejamescycle (talk) 13:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Thejamescycle! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Bolton Wanderers F.C. and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. I also just wanted to remind you that edit summaries are usually suggested :) TheClocksAlwaysTurn (The Clockworks) (contribs) 14:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

hi sorry, i often forget to summarise will do more often. thanks for letting me know, i thought minor would be something largely insignificant like a slight historical update or fix to something mildly innaccurate, i will stop marking things as such. Thejamescycle (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

No worries! I understand that it can be hard to figure out what constitutes as minor, as I struggled with it myself when I first started out. Happy editing! TheClocksAlwaysTurn (The Clockworks) (contribs) 16:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Brobbey, you may be blocked from editing. Joyous! Noise! 14:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arsenal F.C.. TheClocksAlwaysTurn (The Clockworks) (contribs) 14:13, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} or use the unblock wizard.  PhilKnight (talk) 18:27, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

why have i been blocked? Thejamescycle (talk) 19:09, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

This edit was the last straw. PhilKnight (talk) 19:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

I hadn't even realized that I reverted your edit when noting that you incorrectly marked it as a minor edit. My sincerest apologies! Feel free to whack me in the face with a trout if you want, I'd totally understand TheClocksAlwaysTurn (The Clockworks) (contribs) 20:35, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dinercoffee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Arsenal F.C. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. isha ^(talk) 14:13, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. See WP:WPFLINKSNO. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

i have cited better sources instead Thejamescycle (talk) 08:46, 19 April 2026 (UTC)