User talk:Thejamescycle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CS1 error on Bolton Wanderers F.C.

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bolton Wanderers F.C., may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Ways to improve M61 derby

Hello, Thejamescycle,

Thank you for creating M61 derby.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This term would be better as a redirect to List of association football rivalries in the United Kingdom unless you can provide enough sources to prove it is notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Orange sticker}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Orange sticker (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of M61 derby

Notice

The article M61 derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and I can only find one passing use of this phrase in a single BBC article. Alternative to deletion: redirect to List of association football rivalries in the United Kingdom

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

Orange sticker (talk) 22:34, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Fuck off mate the page isn’t causing any harm Thejamescycle (talk) 09:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Information icon Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Orange sticker (talk) 09:46, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

why do you want to delete my hard work this is something i care a lot about, people have fought blood has been spilled in westoughton over what the page is about take it seriously. Thejamescycle (talk) 09:56, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
I'm not Orange sticker but I'll reply anyway. Wikipedia's sourcing requirements apply to every article and right now, the article has zero sources. If the topic is notable, you can demonstrate that through significant coverage, for example newspaper articles; see WP:SIGCOV. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:17, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of M61 derby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M61 derby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M61 derby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Orange sticker (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Nigel Farage. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 13:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed)Thejamescycle (talk) 13:17, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. AusLondonder (talk) 13:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

icon Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nigel Farage. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SmartSE (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 18:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of London Buses Route P13

Notice

The article London Buses Route P13 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Fandom is not a reliable source (per WP:FANDOM).

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. TheMDC4 chat :3 16:55, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Unblock request

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thejamescycle (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

I do not believe I have done anything wrong Thejamescycle (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given that your edit to Nigel Farage was so offside that it had to removed from non-admin view, you not thinking you did anything worng would be a reason to extend the block, not remove it. Ponyobons mots 19:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apparently the repeated personal attacks today (1, 2) was "not doing anything wrong." AusLondonder (talk) 18:58, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of London Buses Route P13 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article London Buses Route P13 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses Route P13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 19:04, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI