User talk:Tony British 99

Hi Tony British 99! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 17:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

😍😍😍 Tony British 99 (talk) 17:57, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The page Nattapong Kunakornwong has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:43, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Isabella sermon Ruth Crafer 2024.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sophisticatedevening^(talk) 15:40, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Dominic McLaughlin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Pride And Prejudice Netflix Cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Still too soon

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2030 FIFA World Cup final and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:11, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

can u delete my wikipedia uploaded file? I accidentally uploaded it. Tony British 99 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2030 FIFA World Cup final. Thanks! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 16:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank You! Tony British 99 (talk) 16:14, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards were:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As Luni notes, the sources don't exist, which is a big issue. Still WP:TOOSOON, resubmitting will likely be denied as well

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2030 FIFA World Cup final and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 17:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

I will fix source soon Tony British 99 (talk) 17:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Isabella Sermon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Middle names and dates of birth require sources, in biography articles. Belbury (talk) 10:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I agree that it is far too soon for this to be independently notable. You could consider merging some of the content about the discussions of the venue for the final into the article 2030 FIFA World Cup, as long as you carefully verify your sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2030 FIFA World Cup final and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 12:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

If you think it's too soon, let me ask you, when will I be able to submit the draft? 2028? Just two years before the 2030 World Cup? Why are you already talking about the 2034 World Cup if you think it's too soon? Please reply. Tony British 99 (talk) 12:14, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

The rule states that if you don't revise your draft within the next six months, it will be considered discarded. But you still think you'll have to discard it soon. By then, at 2028 pages, it will probably be deleted. Tony British 99 (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

I still see you have page 2034 FIFA World Cup, while I only created page 2030. Please reply. Tony British 99 (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

I would say that the article will be accepted once there are multiple reliable, independent sources that talk about the final in detail and allow us to write a proper article about it. At the moment the best sources that you have are a couple of sources speculating about the venue, which I don't see as enough to establish notability.

Regarding the six month timer, if the draft does go unedited for six months and ends up being deleted, you can always ask for it to be restored at WP:REFUND. You can also just make sure to make at least one edit every six months to prevent it from being deleted. MCE89 (talk) 12:18, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for you're reply sir I get it Tony British 99 (talk) 12:20, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

I don't know about too soon but thanks i appreciate it Tony British 99 (talk) 12:21, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I've deleted this page per your request, as you were the only editor. You do not need to tag the page multiple times with the same template, as one speedy deletion template is sufficient. The WP:U1 criterion also doesn't apply here as the file is not a page in your userspace, but I've deleted it per WP:G7. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:02, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ner Dah Mya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ner Dah Mya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 02:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)