User talk:Wikiman2230

You are frustrated when editing about BFDI. Please take a break and edit on another subject for a bit. Star Mississippi 01:38, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

+1, try editing or creating an article in a different area since you succeeded in creating so many biography articles. Object shows have been a bit of a hot topic among editors, and I think most new articles related to them will be deleted/face some opposition for a while regardless of who makes them. HurricaneZeta^C 01:40, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Hm alright Wikiman2230 (talk) 02:41, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Following the above, you replied RIP the article and Yeah we get it , this isn't helpful for building an encyclopedia. Please take a break instead of continually expressing your malcontent to editors acting in good faith. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 23:32, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

I second this; apart from BFDI and its related articles, object show articles are not going to be accepted on Wikipedia until notability is demonstrated. This isn't guaranteed to happen, and even if it did, it would take a while. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 19:54, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Edits such as this and creating every possible alternate spelling redirect are not productive. Please read WP:OWN. You are trending very close to a topic ban if not another block. Star Mississippi 18:47, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi I mean I nominated it for deletion because it was cut from somewhere else Wikiman2230 18:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikiman, your new signature is almost unreadable. Per WP:SIGAPP, would you be so kind as to adjust the colors a bit? Thanks. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Okay Wikiman2230 18:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Hows this? Wikiman (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Very readable in both light and dark mode, thanks. Weirdly enough, your old sig is slightly more readable in dark mode than in light mode... SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

@SarekOfVulcan Oh well thanks lol Wikiman (talk) 21:38, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

I apologize for sounding harsh in the AfD. I was stating my opinion at the deletion review, and was too harsh to you. You are helping build the encyclopedia, and I am ashamed of myself if you feel discouraged editing Wikipedia. Jude Halley (talk) 13:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

@JudeHalley You are forgiven Wikiman2230 (talk) 02:40, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history on The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants (soundtrack) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Multiplivision (talk) 01:23, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

You are the one repeatedly undoing my edits when i told you to stop. If anything, you should stop undoing my edits. Wikiman2230 (talk) 01:29, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Your edits provide no constructive improvement to the article itself. Multiplivision (talk) 01:30, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Its excessive and unnecessary linking Wikiman2230 (talk) 01:30, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

The citation needed template is unnecessary. Multiplivision (talk) 01:31, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

But you need to cite it Wikiman2230 (talk) 01:32, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Anyone can cite the material, but you just implementing the citation needed template is uncooperative. Multiplivision (talk) 01:34, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 23:22, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

@Wikiman2230 I really hoped your editing challenges were limited only to BFDI articles about which you were personally passionate, but jumping into discussions like Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Multiplivision_reported_by_User:Zingo156_(Result:_) are not helpful or productive. During your block I'd like to see you give serious thought to why you see the need to personalize content issues. I think you can be a good editor, but right now the tilting at windmills is exhausting for you as well as the community. Star Mississippi 23:25, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi titling the windmills? Wikiman2230 (talk) 23:31, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi also why block me and not multiplivision? he literally said I am a hypocrite Wikiman2230 (talk) 23:37, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Because I saw no evidence of them jumping into unrelated disputes, whereas multiple editors have cautioned you against same in recent weeks. It's not productive @Wikiman2230

Tilting at windmills, apologies I meant to link it. Star Mississippi 23:41, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi Atleast give them some kind of punishment like me. What is wrong with me.. Wikiman2230 (talk) 00:11, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

I am not reviewing @Multiplivision's edits, but it's possible someone will sanction them, or not. No one is being punished, but you're repeating the exact behavior that led to this block and many of the warnings above. I'll be frank, if it continues the next block will be longer. Star Mississippi 00:13, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi Alright I'm sorry Wikiman2230 (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Wikiman2230. It appears you have !voted more than once at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 North Carolina Cessna Citation II crash. I don't know if this was intentional or not, but it would be a good idea to remove the duplicate !vote (I have replied to it). Editors are only permitted to !vote once per AfD. Thanks! 11WB (talk) 03:47, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

This can be disregarded now. 11WB (talk) 04:06, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

It was an accident lol Wikiman2230 (talk) 19:17, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Category:Works by the Huang brothers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 07:18, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, Wikiman2230, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created at least one women's biography and hope there will be many more. In this connection, you might find it useful to look through the guidance in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 15:37, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Wikiman2230 01:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

The page Wikiman2230/Drafts/Solan Mirisim has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

@Liz thanks Wikiman (talk) 21:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Wikiman2230. Thank you for your work on Solan Mirisim. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 03:17, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Liberland, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Registered "citizens" do not equate to residents. There are no residents in Liberland. Donald Albury 20:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed your signature is very hard to read because it's blue text against a dark green background. Can you consider changing the background or text color to make it easier to read? --Retro (talk | contribs) 23:00, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

@Retro I already did Wikiman (talk) 23:01, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Whoops, sorry to bother you then. Retro (talk | contribs) 23:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Although Four (Battle for Dream Island) has not yet submitted for review, looks like you ready to upload Four's new TPOT 18 pose image but not non-free to add to infobox since someone has passed the link to Four's new pose from TPOT 18. ~2026-17067-6 (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm having trouble understanding on what you are saying. Could you please rephrase it so it can be more understandable? Wikiman (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

i rephrased it, upload the new Four TPOT 18 pose using Upload Wizard but not non-free and add to infobox. ~2026-12193-9 (talk) 16:36, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-12193-9 Where is this image? There is a high chance that it is copyrighted, so please don't upload it. Copyright violations are taken seriously and will be deleted. HurricaneZeta^C 16:45, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@HurricaneZeta Wasn't planning to anyway Wikiman (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Wikiman2230. Thank you for your work on Valeriy Vavrynyuk. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to write this article! Your contributions are greatly appreciated. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 02:18, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

This isn't very important and you don't have to change it, but I just wanted to let you know that some of the articles listed at User:Wikiman2230/Articles, such as Parapagurus andreui, Christopher Jehn, Joe Kuli, and William Bando, have the year 2025 written as the year of creation, when they were created in 2026 instead. It's alright to make these kind of mistakes. - Sebbog13 (talk) 00:28, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Sebbog13 Whoops. Thanks for letting me know! Wikiman (talk) 00:29, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I've noticed you have reverted some of my additions of a vector file for the flag of the People's Fighters Front. You've listed them as "inaccurate flag", but I am unable to find any source that verifies the crescent of their flag being at an angle, while the social media posts showing its orientation appear to show a completely upright orientation (I have determined the second link, of one of their public statements, to not be showing the crescent at an angle; the upper point of the crescent is too close to the edge of the field for it to be at any orientation other than upright). Do you have any sources showing an angled orientation? If so, I can update the flag to be accurate, so that a vector file can be used either way, instead of a blind revert to a raster file. Nihilberry (talk) 01:15, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Nihilberry This source [] indicates the jpg flag Wikiman (talk) 01:28, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I have seen that, but that's not a physical flag, that's a logo - the image shows none of the crescent on the physical flag. I do not believe that to be proof enough to say that is the correct orientation when several other images of real-world PFF flags use the upright orientation. Also, that image shows the blue tip of the crescent again, which falls into the same proofing as the second link I provided - the upper tip of the crescent still appears to be in line with the lower one in their physical flags, unless they happened to simply reuse an old flag. That being said, it is theoretically possible they made a minor change in orientation of the flag since 12/12/2025 (some more direct images for more examples), but further sources show the logo as being the same as the one you are showing at the same date as the former link. The latter link here contains a link to a direct social media post which shows both the logo and the upright orientation of the flag shown, albeit the flag hanging and folding does make it appear to be at more of an angle than it actually is. Nihilberry (talk) 01:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Nihilberry Valid. Very well then, you may change it along with the template data as well. I might as well agree here, but I do think it's an alternate flag alongside the jpg. Wikiman (talk) 01:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Ultimately, I think it's safer to use the physical flags that have been seen, although if you do find any sources which prove an angled orientation, feel free to bug me about it - I prepared an angled version of the vector file off the original raster image, before I found the images showing the physical flags' designs, so I can simply switch it out and reverting to a raster file can be avoided. Thanks for discussing this, though. Nihilberry (talk) 01:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Nihilberry No problem. I reverted it because originally, the svg file was someone's recreation of the flag, which was deemed to be inaccurate as per source I listed prior. Glad we could discuss this in a civilized manner. Wikiman (talk) 02:22, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Where it says "Editors may use any reasonable section and subsection names that they choose", that implies that the change you made to Joseph Maude was not warranted. This kind of editing is and should be discouraged. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:10, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Ali bin Muhammad al-Idrisi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 24#Ali bin Muhammad al-Idrisi is not the same person as Muhammad ibn Ali al-Idrisi. This page shouldn't be redirecting to Muhammad ibn Ali al-Idrisi's page|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 24 § Ali bin Muhammad al-Idrisi is not the same person as Muhammad ibn Ali al-Idrisi. This page shouldn't be redirecting to Muhammad ibn Ali al-Idrisi's page]] until a consensus is reached.

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 13:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hello, Wikiman2230. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samapta Bhayangkara Corps, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikiman2230. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Waqfeyat Misr Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Category:Video games developed by SonderingEmily has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Go D. Usopp (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hello, Wikiman. I just wanted to inform you that you added a short description to a navbox. This edit caused an issue where the 2026 Afghanistan–Pakistan war article appeared to lack a short description when it had one. Next time, please do not add short descriptions to templates. It's alright to make these kind of mistakes. I am just informing you so that you don't make them again. Also, you don't have to worry about this being an issue anymore. The short description was removed by another editor. Thanks in advance. - Sebbog13 (talk) 03:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. I originally put it as blank because since t was a template, it didnt really need a description. Thanks again Wikiman (talk) 03:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:A Very 1999 Christmas AlbumCover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:A Very 1999 Christmas (album). Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 03:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

@RangersRus Thank you for the message Wikiman (talk) 03:45, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikiman2230. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Waqfeyat Misr Foundation".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 7 March 2026 (UTC)