User talk:特磨

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hakkari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Please provide a reason for why you are removing Silla as well as the subsequent aftermath to the Baekje-Tang War from List of Wars of Independence. It is clearly well documented that Baekje was supported by Yamato Japan and was defeated by the Tang-Silla Alliance Sunnyediting99 (talk) 17:37, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

1) It was more complicated than that, given that Taizong of Tang had originally promised that lands below the Taedong river to Silla during the conflict, and that Silla used that as a casus bellus to destroy the occupation within a few years.

2) This is a fair argument, though again given that it was overthrown a few years after its establishment, it might necessate that additional point.

Also why did you delete your response? I had initially asked the question out of good faith. Sunnyediting99 (talk) 18:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mongolian Revolution of 1911, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khovd.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balinese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

I was thinking that the Battle of Lalakaon be considered a liberation war, since it involved the Orthodox Byzantine Empire annexing the Muslim Emirate of Melitene and later the Paulician Principality of Tephrike. Epitome of Creativity (talk) 03:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

I think this is inappropriate, as the two states joined this war not for opposing Byzantine rule or sovereignty over them. Besides, the Emirate leader had come to power 30 years before the war and was a vassal of the Abbasid Empire. This suggests that the Byzantine emperor annexed the Emirate in response to their depredations, not because he felt the Emirate was challenging his sovereignty over territories he later annexed. Many thanks for discussion with me. 特磨 (talk) 04:22, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cacos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monarchy of Cambodia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramesuan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I reverted your change in the piped link for "Company of the Indies". The French Indies Company, which you redirected the link to, was founded in 1723, after the Natchez Revolt. The Company of the Indies mentioned in the article is John Law's Company, formally Compagnie des Indes at the time it was dissolved but popularly known as the Mississippi Company.17:53, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. However, the article of Natchez Revolt states that the rebellion took place in 1729, which is later than 1723. But there may be something I am not clear about. 特磨 (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

You are correct; I'll revert myself. I think I flipped 1723 to 1732 in my head. The whole transition of company control in Louisiana at the time was pretty convoluted, so I'll add that to a reason for my mistake.—Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 18:08, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm also studying world history by reading and editing Wikipedia. 特磨 (talk) 18:14, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Mirwais Hotak did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

@特磨:: Hello, could you please create the page Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq with just a redirect to Great Seljuk Empire, basically please write this code - #REDIRECT Great Seljuk Empire

.

I just want to cite Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq in one of my edits, but temporary accounts can not create a page, and I just don't want to create an ordinary account and wait to do such a small thing. If you create Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq with a redirect, my small edit would look much nicer instead of jsut being red. Basically, the redirect would be justified too since Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq was basically part of or at some points even equivalent of Great Seljuk Empire. Please help with this edit, your help would be very appriciated. ~2025-36098-21 (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Actually, you can edit like this: Seljuk Sultanate of Iraq. 特磨 (talk) 15:28, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars of independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poznań Uprising.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isa Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musa Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Would that technically count as a war of independence, since it was a railroad-wide mutiny across Siberia to prove the legitimacy of Czechoslovakia as a sovereign state to the Entente? Epitome of Creativity (talk) 01:12, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your continued and timely attention to this article. Regarding the anonymous user's addition of Serbian resistance during World War I to the list, I will handle it appropriately later today in accordance with the criteria shown on the Talk page (I plan to reject it according to the exclusion criterion 14 and add Brunei Revolt back). Thans! 特磨 (talk) 01:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I get what you're saying, but you still didn't tell me whether or not the event I listed fits any criterion for inclusion in the article. Epitome of Creativity (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your patience. I haven't had time to fully review Revolt of the Czechoslovak Legion yet, so I can't give a definitive answer right now. Once I do, I'll address whether it meets any of the inclusion criteria. I'm recently busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. 特磨 (talk) 04:08, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

You're welcome. Also, while you're at it, could you verify whether or not the 1882 Herzegovina uprising counts as a war of independence? Epitome of Creativity (talk) 23:05, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

• About the case of 1882 Herzegovina uprising, the article does not indicate that the Serb and Muslim rebels aimed to create a new nation or an independent state; instead, the article describes the rebels' nostalgia for Ottoman rule. Even if they established a rebel government, it might be only for wartime management.
• About the Revolt of the Czechoslovak Legion, although the rebeles supported Czechoslovak independence, but the purpose of the revolt against Russia "sought only to secure safe exit from Russia", instead of establishment of a new state in Russian territory. Based on this consideration, this revolt is not suitable for inclusion on the list. 特磨 (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Could I edit the talk page criterion? I have a few good examples to add. Epitome of Creativity (talk) 22:28, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, you may. 特磨 (talk) 23:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm also adding Cudgel War to the list since it's very often misinterpreted as a Finnish national struggle for independence from Swedish rule. Epitome of Creativity (talk) 07:11, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Agreed. The Wikipedia article itself does not mention that this war was a "Finnish attempt to secede from Sweden and gain independence"; objectively speaking, the rebel leader did not declare himself king. See Cudgel War: "Modern Finnish historiography sees the uprising in the context of the conflict between Duke Charles and Sigismund, King of Sweden and Poland (War against Sigismund). Charles agitated the peasants to revolt against the nobility of Finland, which supported Sigismund during the conflict." Temo (talk) 08:14, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Song–Xia wars, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:08, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Chuar Rebellion when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 14:25, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

What’s going on with these? They seem supremely unhelpful. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:27, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I learned the function of an Anchor from WP: Anchor. In short, it prevents a WP:Redirect to a section from being lost when the section's heading has been changed. Although it seems useless for the article where the anchor is placed, it is helpful for the redirection page that redirects to the section of that article.

In my edits, I do this to ensure that some of List of wars of independence's items linking or redirecting to a section still function if someone renames the section. I don't think it is unhelpful. Temo (talk) 04:05, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Great Theban Revolt

added links pointing to State and Diadochus

Republic of the Rif

added links pointing to National Council and Administration

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:50, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

You've been here awhile, so I'm not gonna template you. Usually, you don't leave edit descriptions in your edits, evidently backed by your contributions. Explained in this help page, "Accurate summaries help other contributors decide whether they want to review an edit, and to understand the change should they choose to review it. Edits without edit summaries are more likely to be reverted incorrectly because they provide no explanation or rationale for the change." In all, it's practical to have edit descriptions. I hope you understand my concern, and I hope you keep remembering to add edit descriptions. Have a good day. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 16:08, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Please take a moment to review my contribution list if you are interested. I always leave a summary at least once for every series of edits I make to an article. Temo (talk) 16:20, 27 August 2026 (UTC)