Talk:MacOS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the macOS article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "MacOS" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| MacOS was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article contains a translation of மேக் இயங்குதளம் from ta.wikipedia. |
| The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
It is Recommended to set Liquid Glass as the Default User Interface
Hello, Suggest making Liquid Glass the Default User Interface, thank you. 59.152.203.38 (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- Liquid Glass is a design language for user interfaces; it is not a full user interface. Guy Harris (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- And Aqua (user interface) refers both to the full user interface and the design language, which is unfortunate, but I haven't heard any name that applies to the parts of the user interface that are independent of the design language.
- Microsoft Windows says the user interface is the Windows shell, rather than saying Windows Aero or Metro or some other design language that Microsoft have used. Guy Harris (talk) 03:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2025
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the Security section, please change, “Only the latest major version of MacOS receives patches for all known security vulnerabilities…” from MacOS Sequoia to MacOS Tahoe. Thank you, ~2025-36813-80 (talk) 04:17, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Done - Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 05:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. ~2025-36813-80 (talk) 12:42, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
It's Unix, not "Unix-like"
Mac OS X has been Unix 03 certified since 2007 yet this article claims it is "Unix-like" using uninformed sources. Please correct with this source: https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/ DHammarberg2 (talk) 03:06, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- While GOLDIEM J (talk · contribs) focuses on irrelevant semantics by claiming that macOS is not “Unix-based” because it builds on FreeBSD (a Unix-like, non–UNIX-certified derivative of BSD Unix), this argument is misplaced. macOS itself is UNIX 03 certified, which means it is based on the Single UNIX Specification, also known as UNIX. Therefore, the accurate description is “Unix-based” or, if you like, “UNIX-certified,” not “Unix-like.” The term “Unix-like” refers to systems that behave like Unix but are not officially licensed or certified under the UNIX trademark. So in this case, calling macOS “Unix-like” is the only wording that is clearly factually incorrect. DHammarberg2 (talk) 23:35, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- @DHammarberg2: Done, thank you. GOLDIEM J (talk) 23:56, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Therefore, the accurate description is “Unix-based” or, if you like, “UNIX-certified,”
Or just "Unix". macOS is a "Unix" in the sense of "it passed the SUS test suite, so the Keepers of the Unix Trademark deemed it conformant to the SUS, and allowed it to be referred to with the trademark "Unix".- "Unix-based" is a vague term, as it doesn't indicate in what fashion something is "based" on Unix. "Its API is based on the Unix API"? That's true of some non-trademarked Unix-like systems as well. "Its code is based some Unix code from AT&T or the subsequent holders of the copyright on that code"? There are trademark Unixes whose code is minimally, if at all, based on any AT&T code. Guy Harris (talk) 07:20, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- While I do not see a problem with the term “Unix-based,” since a system can reasonably be described that way if it builds on UNIX/POSIX principles and is also formally certified, I understand the concern about precision. The term “Unix-based” can be interpreted in different ways, and, as Guy Harris points out, it does not necessarily specify whether one is referring to code heritage, API design, standards conformance, or trademark status.
- That said, because macOS is UNIX 03 certified and has passed the Single UNIX Specification test suite, it is fully entitled to be described as a UNIX system under the trademark rules. For the sake of clarity and precision, describing it as “a proprietary UNIX operating system” is both accurate and unambiguous. I therefore fully support the current wording in the article. DHammarberg2 (talk) 20:48, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- @DHammarberg2: Done, thank you. GOLDIEM J (talk) 23:56, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Minor edit: changing "As of 2025" to "As of 2026"
At the time of writing, it is currently 6:40 AM UTC, therefore this edit should take place. I would've done it myself but I don't meet the requirements to edit this page. Keyboard1000n17 (talk) 06:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
