User talk:Adrikshit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2026

Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nadiya Ke Paar (1982 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 03:54, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Nadiya Ke Paar (1982 film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nadiya Ke Paar (1982 film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohagara Temple (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You’ve made a good start to this article, but unfortunately as yet it lacks sufficient sources which prove notability. It requires 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, which talk at length about the topic of the article. Unfortunately the sources you have so far aren’t quite there. Please try to find some sources which talk about the temple in depth, but which are not published by any group with ties to the temple. Good luck 👍

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sohagara Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Adrikshit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhojpuri Paintings (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JesusisGreat7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhojpuri Paintings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jesus isGreat7 14:02, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohagara Temple (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah1099 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sohagara Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

whats the reason for disapproval? I have already added more sources. Adrikshit (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

First it's need more expansion of subject and correct placement of citation and other improvement. Also i doubt did you used LLM for creating this draft, by seeing the tone and placement of citation. Abdullah1099 (talk) 15:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

For expansion, it needs to first approved as sturd so that others can contribute in expanding it.

No, I havent uses LLM lol. Its just a simple paragraph. Calling it LLM generated is baseless.

What is the definition of correct citation ? Adrikshit (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

There are multiple problems one of which is those citation that are put in a line rather than put on each statements. I only doubt you using LLM but i hope you not used LLM as you told. Hoping you can improve and resubmit the draft for approval. Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles