User talk:BabyJerryISking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is BabyJerryISking's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kadsura induta has been accepted

Kadsura induta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nil^nz 03:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kadsura scandens (blume) blume (March 20)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Ethmostigmus, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to write articles from scratch.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

It appears that a large language model was used to create this draft. The final reference is listed as "Phytochemical constituents of Schisandraceae: A review". Frontiers in Pharmacology. 17. 2026., however, the URL provided leads to a different paper published in a different journal which makes no mention of K. scandens, and I can find no evidence that Frontiers in Pharmacology ever published a paper titled "Phytochemical constituents of Schisandraceae: A review". The second to last reference, Liu, J.; Wang, W. (2023). "Traditional Use, Pharmacology and Toxicology of the Lignans in Genus Kadsura: A Systematic Review". Records of Natural Products. 17 (5). is a real paper, however, also makes no mention of K. scandens. This draft needs to be rewritten by a human, with references to actual sources that actually pertain to this species.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Kadsura scandens (blume) blume to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 04:09, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

thank you. i did not use AI for the writing itsself, but i did use it for finding citation. i will fix this immediately, and thank you for the tip. BabyJerryISking (talk) 16:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kadsura scandens (March 26)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Nil NZ, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to write articles from scratch.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

This draft needs to be WP:TNTed.

The issues identified by the previous reviewer regarding LLMs are still present, and the entire draft needs to be deleted and rewritten by a human.

The majority of what's written in the draft is not supported by the cited sources. For example, under Distribution and habitat, we have It typically grows in primary and secondary forests at elevations ranging from 50 to 1,200 meters above sea level, yet no where in the cited source is elevation mentioned.

Ditto for the Phytochemistry section; none of those compounds are mentioned in the source.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Kadsura scandens to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

nil^nz 03:42, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, BabyJerryISking! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nil^nz 03:42, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kobing (dessert studio) (March 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Hurricane Wind and Fire, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

promotional language: see Words to watch;
personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

Remember we are not trying to advertise the studio's menu, see WP:NOTADVERT.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Kobing (dessert studio) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 01:23, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kadsura borneesis (April 9)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Theroadislong, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

spam references to purchase are not helpful, please find reliable independent sources

Next steps

Edit Draft:Kadsura borneesis to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello BabyJerryISking! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Hi. im very new to wikipedia., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kadsura celebica has been accepted

Kadsura celebica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PeriodicEditor (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, BabyJerryISking! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 21:23, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! BabyJerryISking (talk) 14:03, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Co-ordinating on kadsura articles

I noticed you were writing about the species in Kadsura. I was also planning on starting some stubs about them, so we should co-ordinate this. You can do them instead if you want, but i've collected some sources at User:EmergentAnarchy/sandbox#Species. Should I start them and then you can expand them? Or should we each take half the remaining species? EmergentAnarchy (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh yeah totally! Iv'e already written two articles about them, one of them is currently being reviewed. I was planning on remaking my K. scandens article, but you can if you want to! BabyJerryISking (talk) 13:54, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, love the idea of us both taking half! maybe if its uneven we could do one together! BabyJerryISking (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Great! I've just published acsmithii, and verrucosa is about ready to go. That leaves us with eight (excluding your borneensis draft - I've tagged my draft page for deletion). Are there any you particularly want to write?

I've also uploaded a few images of dead specimens, do you need any for yours? EmergentAnarchy (talk) 14:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh cool! I'd love to write about K. marmorata, i find it very interesting! (btw, check out https://portal.cybertaxonomy.org/flora-malesiana/cdm_dataportal/taxon/ae59fc62-5fa6-4c59-b7f0-af2126d37a23, its been a lifesaver.) BabyJerryISking (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, do you have any images of dead specimens for K. marmorata? thanks! BabyJerryISking (talk) 14:15, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?dataset_key=861e6afe-f762-11e1-a439-00145eb45e9a&taxon_key=3745257 this page has plenty public domain photos from the harvard university herbaria. I'll upload a few to commons EmergentAnarchy (talk) 14:18, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! the thing ive had most trouble with is finding any common use images OF kadsura, so the herbaria images helped. BabyJerryISking (talk) 14:20, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kadsura_marmorata_01.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kadsura_marmorata_02.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kadsura_marmorata_03.jpg

Uploaded these ones EmergentAnarchy (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! in a few minutes, i'll start working on the k. marmorata draft. progress updates soon! BabyJerryISking (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

I'll take K. scandens if that's ok with you EmergentAnarchy (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah of course! BabyJerryISking (talk) 16:44, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Ok, k. borneensis got accepted! have you sent yours about K. verrucosa yet? BabyJerryISking (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

yeah, Kadsura verrucosa is up, if you want to do anything with it EmergentAnarchy (talk) 21:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

I've also started on angustifolia, and added images to all the existing Kadsura articles. I'll try and get one for your new article in a bit. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Do you mind if I do K. Heteroclita next? Also, Scandens is *almost* done. BabyJerryISking (talk) 21:49, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

That's fine. But I also just did one for scandens Kadsura scandens EmergentAnarchy (talk) 21:55, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

checked the article out for k. scandens, and its really cool! also, i just sent up the article about k. marmorata. BabyJerryISking (talk) 23:41, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, surprised to see that verrucosa was described by Gagnep and not A.C smith! I've noticed that albert described many species of kadsura, especially in Sargentia (1947). BabyJerryISking (talk) 03:54, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Great, I'll tag my marmorata draft for deletion, and start on philippinensis EmergentAnarchy (talk) 08:35, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

great! maybe i could start on heteroclita right now BabyJerryISking (talk) 13:24, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Cool. I'll start on oblongifolia EmergentAnarchy (talk) 13:26, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

👍 BabyJerryISking (talk) 15:26, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Can you upload some heteroclita images to commons? BabyJerryISking (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Kadsura_heteroclita There's already some available EmergentAnarchy (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

https://www.mybis.gov.my/sp/16972 https://www.rhs.org.uk/plants/325424/wd/details here's a couple sources you might want to use EmergentAnarchy (talk) 15:45, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks!! BabyJerryISking (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kadsura borneensis has been accepted

Kadsura borneensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 18:31, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles