User talk:Budew1234

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Budew1234's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

March 2026

Hello, I'm I am bad at usernames. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Aurelia (crater), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 20:44, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tapple (April 8)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Dan arndt, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Tapple to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Budew1234! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Budew1234! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Please keep the following in mind:

Don't post your personal information, including your real name, email address, phone number, identification number, or home, work, or school address. This includes personal photos. Anything you post here may be retained forever.
Do not contribute to topics that are closely related to you, including topics about your family, your friends, your teachers, your professors, etc.
Wikipedia is not social media. You will have a better experience improving the encyclopedia than contributing to pages not directly related to the improvement of articles.
Be mindful of user messages. Wikipedia has a lot of written and unwritten rules and customs, so if you slip up, you may get a message informing you about your behavior and what you need to do to correct it. They should not be taken personally.

For additional guidance, please read guidance for younger editors.

Happy editing! nil^nz 08:45, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ctenocella pectinata has been accepted

Ctenocella pectinata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch 44 23:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ctenocella lyra has been accepted

Ctenocella lyra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CoconutOctopus talk 11:30, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Op Games (April 30)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Jlwoodwa, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Edit Draft:The Op Games to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

jlwoodwa (talk) 01:10, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Op Games (May 3)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Tarlby, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Edit Draft:The Op Games to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 23:19, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

One-entry sections in disambiguation pages

That's not a good idea. Why single out this particular entry? Most of the time, it should go into the catchall Other uses section. In this case, I've moved the crater to the Places section, where there was already an asteroid. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:50, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't know. Thanks for moving it! Budew1234 (talk) 16:59, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Op Games (May 5)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

For a company we need corporate depth. See WP:SIRS and the sections below on corporate depth and corporate trivia. For a product then WP:NPRODUCT would apply, however that is not the current basis of this draft. At the moment there are 4 sources, 3 of which are not helpful: PRNewswire is a press release circulation agency, the company itself is another source, and YouTube is self published. More information on this via WP:RSP. This leaves one source and it isn't possible to meet WP:SIRS with just one source.

Next steps

Edit Draft:The Op Games to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 18:15, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hues and Cues (May 12)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, EatingCarBatteries, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Hues and Cues to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 18:43, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hues and Cues (May 14)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, 97198, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Hues and Cues to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

97198 (talk) 05:23, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi!

I just wanted to pop in and thank you for the good work you've been doing on board game pages recently! I am so glad you started drafts for Tapple and The Op Games, they're ones I've had my eye on to work on for a while!

I did notice a few of your drafts getting rejected for lack of sources, so I thought I would point you to a couple of useful resources you can use as a starting point for finding references. For board game articles, the BTG Wikiproject sources list and the Wikipedia reliable sources list are great places to look through to see if any sources in there have articles about your game, as well as doing a "text contents" search of the game name on the Internet Archive.

If you ever have any questions or want help with anything, I am always available at my talk page :D Salem Ander (talk) 07:50, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your welcome, and thank you! I didn't really know what sources are reliable and not reliable. Thanks for the guide and support!

Zakiya (crater) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zakiya (crater). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sarge Graham (talk) 07:48, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 10001 (number) (May 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Nil NZ, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the number meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for numbers. The draft requires either:

evidence that the number meets any of the specific criteria for numbers;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the number in detail;
are reliable: from reputable mathematical outlets with editorial oversight.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If no such sources exist, the number is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Just noting previous discussions about this number as well at WP:Articles for deletion/10001 (number) & WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 11#10001 (number).

Next steps

Edit Draft:10001 (number) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

In solidarity, nil^nz 09:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Op Games (June 9)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, JacobTheRox, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Improvement has been made to the article since previous submission, but you still haven't really demonstrated that the company is notable. While some of its games are good, WP:NINHERITED makes it clear that the company must be notable in its own right. Unfortunately, while I appreciate you have worked hard on the article, I don't know if there is a serious path to the article space here, but I am declining instead of rejecting in good faith to give you another chance to find sources showing that the company is notable, not just because it has made certain board games.

Next steps

Edit Draft:The Op Games to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 21:53, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: -3 (June 12)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Hurricane Wind and Fire, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be a dictionary definition. Wikipedia is not a dictionary and we do not accept articles that are simply definitions of words, acronyms, or slang.

To improve the draft it must expand on the subject, such as discussing its history, cultural significance, or impact rather than just defining the word;
To create a dictionary entry you can contribute to our sister project Wiktionary. Please ensure the subject meets Wiktionary's inclusion criteria.

Still largely just a dictionary definition. Expand onto the properties section to a point where it is similar to the properties section in -2 and it will be ready for acceptance.

Next steps

Edit Draft:-3 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:41, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: -3 (June 13)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Stuartyeates, left the following feedback:

This draft reads like an essay or opinion piece. Wikipedia is not a place for original research or personal opinions. The draft should:

summarize secondary sources: do not offer your own analysis or arguments;
be written from a neutral point of view: represent the subject without bias, avoiding praise, criticism, or persuasive or promotional language;
not contain original research: do not include new theories, unpublished ideas, or personal experiences.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

Per comment by User:Hurricane Wind and Fire, needs a properties section on a par with -2.

Next steps

Edit Draft:-3 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Stuartyeates (talk) 23:15, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: −3 (June 19)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Stuartyeates, left the following feedback:

As before. You need to read and act on the feedback.

Next steps

Edit Draft:−3 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:29, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Xing Lin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. While you did cite a source that would normally be considered reliable, a source from 2007 can not be relied on while making a claim about 2008. The source you cited does not mention of the 2008 Summer Olympics. Gab4gab (talk) 00:53, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: −3 (July 5)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Stuartyeates, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Edit Draft:−3 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Stuartyeates (talk) 23:54, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2763 (number) (July 6)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Hurricane Wind and Fire, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the number meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for numbers. The draft requires either:

evidence that the number meets any of the specific criteria for numbers;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the number in detail;
are reliable: from reputable mathematical outlets with editorial oversight.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If no such sources exist, the number is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Should be merged to 2000 (number)#2700 to 2799, there does not appear to be anything noteworthy about the number.

Next steps

Edit Draft:2763 (number) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:22, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aglaonice hirtipalpis has been accepted

Aglaonice hirtipalpis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

In solidarity, nil^nz 04:35, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atla Regio (July 14)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Freddieh9, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for astronomical objects. The draft requires either:

evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for astronomical objects;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the object in detail, not just brief mentions or database entries;
are reliable: from reputable scientific outlets with editorial oversight.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Only the sources by Mason and Senske provide significant coverage.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Atla Regio to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Freddieh9 (talk) 00:54, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 444 (number) (July 14)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Freddieh9, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the number meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for numbers. The draft requires either:

evidence that the number meets any of the specific criteria for numbers;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the number in detail;
are reliable: from reputable mathematical outlets with editorial oversight.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If no such sources exist, the number is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Edit Draft:444 (number) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Freddieh9 (talk) 21:58, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2763 (number) (July 14)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Freddieh9, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the number meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for numbers. The draft requires either:

evidence that the number meets any of the specific criteria for numbers;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the number in detail;
are reliable: from reputable mathematical outlets with editorial oversight.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If no such sources exist, the number is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Same reasoning as previous decline, your only real addition was that it's a polite number, but most numbers are polite, so not interesting.

Next steps

Edit Draft:2763 (number) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Freddieh9 (talk) 22:25, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:999 (number) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:999 (number). Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 02:34, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 999 (number) (July 17)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Stuartyeates, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

The presence of a number in a sequence does not constitute coverage.

Next steps

Edit Draft:999 (number) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Stuartyeates (talk) 07:41, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 999 (number) has been accepted

999 (number), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ASUKITE 18:02, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Number Notability

Hi, I'm reaching out to you here to try and explain how our process of notability related to numbers works. Broadly, there are two guidelines on the subject which I would encourage you check out: WP:NUMBER and WP:NUM/G (with the second providing examples and clarification). Numbers are unusual among topics on Wikipedia due to the fact that, unlike many other topics, there can be practically an infinite number of arbitrary facts about them. This means that our standards for determining whether a fact deserves inclusion are rather high (a lot more like WP:GNG than WP:V). Our guidence specifically rules out almost all facts solely cited to OEIS because, while verifiable, OEIS makes no assertion as to notability of an individual number in a sequence (and hardly makes a claim as to notability of the sequence itself). If you would like to make an article, please look for 3 independent, scholarly, sources that assert the notability of the number. I would advise looking for any mathematicians who have covered the number or discussion of the number's role in religion/culture by theologians/historians. Allan Nonymous (talk) 21:22, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Alright... Budew1234 (talk) 02:11, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

I give up trying to make number articles if they keep getting redirected, since it feels like I'm wasting my time. Budew1234 (talk) 22:51, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed you have had some trouble assessing number article notability. That's totally understandable as the guidelines are rather strict (mostly due to the fact that there are an infinite number of number facts and the interesting number paradox). Before creating an article, I would personally suggest typing the number into google scholar and look for at least 3 separate hits, only if you see that, (or if you find a bunch of news coverage from our WP:RSs) you should consider creating an article. One place to look may be 691, which likely has good coverage due to its relation to the Bernoulli numbers . Allan Nonymous (talk) 04:35, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 324 (number) (July 19)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Per WP:NNUM

Have professional mathematicians published papers on this kind of number, or chapters in a book, or an entire book about this kind of number? Do MathWorld or PlanetMath have articles on this kind of number?

Is there at least one commonly accepted name for this kind of number?

Next steps

Edit Draft:324 (number) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:21, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:401 (number) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:401 (number). Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:35, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 401 (number) has been accepted

401 (number), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:57, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 399 (number) has been accepted

399 (number), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:28, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 9801 (number) has been accepted

9801 (number), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CostalCal (talk) 03:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eagle Island, Chagos Archipelago has been accepted

Eagle Island, Chagos Archipelago, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Budew1234. Thank you for your work on Eagle Island, Chagos Archipelago. Another editor, Robert McClenon, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Is a better disambiguation possible?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Robert McClenon}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Aglaonema (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aglaonema (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aglaonema (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Certes (talk) 18:52, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles